State of World Population 2012 - UNFPA Haiti
State of World Population 2012 - UNFPA Haiti
State of World Population 2012 - UNFPA Haiti
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTERFIVEThe costs and savings<strong>of</strong> upholding the rightto family planningTo uphold human rights and to reap the benefits <strong>of</strong> family planning for theeconomic and social well-being <strong>of</strong> individuals, households, communities andnations, expanding access to family planning is essential. But how much will thiscost? Treating family planning as a right has important implications for developmentpolicy and for the sustainable development framework that will in 2015 succeed theMillennium Development Goals. The normative dimension <strong>of</strong> human rightstMwanasha, along withnearly 200 women,gather under theshade <strong>of</strong> a Balboabtree. They’ve comefor contraceptives,which for many <strong>of</strong>them can save theirlives and transformtheir families' futures.In Malawi, one in 36women die in childbirthcompared to one in4,600 in the UK.©Lindsay Mgbor/UK Department forInternational Developmentbrings about a radical shift by moving familyplanning strategies from the realm <strong>of</strong> policycommitment and economic pragmatism to therealm <strong>of</strong> obligations and the setting <strong>of</strong> red flagsin dealing with complex policy trade<strong>of</strong>fs.On the pragmatic economic side, however,it requires a look at the economic and budgetaryimplications <strong>of</strong> the obligation <strong>of</strong> equalityand non-discrimination in fiscal and budgetarypolicies, for example, the impact <strong>of</strong> user fees ortaxes on the affordability on contraceptive services.It also requires a focus on the obligation<strong>of</strong> progressive realization over time in relationto budgetary allocations across sectors as part <strong>of</strong>the national budget.Estimates <strong>of</strong> the costs have not generally takenthis rights perspective, though they are certainlynot in conflict with it. They have tended t<strong>of</strong>ocus on the demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> thepopulation, its age structure and how this incombination with unmet need generates numbers<strong>of</strong> potential family planning clients.Growing needThe need for family planning will grow as thenumber <strong>of</strong> people entering their reproductiveyears increases in the near future, especiallyin the poorest countries. About 15 per cent<strong>of</strong> women <strong>of</strong> reproductive age in developingcountries wish to delay their next birth or ceasechildbearing but are not currently using modernmethods <strong>of</strong> contraception (Singh and Darroch,<strong>2012</strong>). Their right to family planning is thereforeat risk.“Unmet need,” according to the widelyaccepted definition, is not as high in richercountries. Yet “unintendedness” is a term thatapplies to a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> births inrich and poor countries alike. The lowest rate<strong>of</strong> unintendedness is 30 per cent in WesternTHE STATE OF WORLD POPULATION <strong>2012</strong>87