29.11.2012 Views

The Ethics of Banking: Conclusions from the Financial Crisis (Issues ...

The Ethics of Banking: Conclusions from the Financial Crisis (Issues ...

The Ethics of Banking: Conclusions from the Financial Crisis (Issues ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

106 8 <strong>The</strong> “<strong>Banking</strong> Secret”, <strong>the</strong> Right to Privacy, and <strong>the</strong> Banks’ Duty to Confidentiality<br />

<strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> a person’s rights <strong>of</strong> personality is a high constitutional priority,<br />

and banking secrecy plays a part in protecting those personality rights that reside in<br />

<strong>the</strong> things a person owns, it must also be accorded a value for contributing to <strong>the</strong><br />

protection <strong>of</strong> such rights.<br />

<strong>Banking</strong> secrecy has force in civil law, based on <strong>the</strong> agreement between <strong>the</strong> bank<br />

and <strong>the</strong> customer to preserve <strong>the</strong> customer’s trust and confidentiality. However, it<br />

only has force in civil law as long as <strong>the</strong> bank in question is not obliged to disclose<br />

information by laws <strong>of</strong> higher precedence. This generally occurs when prosecuting<br />

authorities in a criminal trial demand information <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> banks about <strong>the</strong> accused.<br />

In this case, penal law trumps civil law. Nowadays, in view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> growing importance<br />

attached to <strong>the</strong> taxation <strong>of</strong> financial assets, <strong>the</strong> banks’ duty <strong>of</strong> disclosure in tax<br />

investigations and tax prosecutions is becoming <strong>the</strong> main problem in relation to <strong>the</strong><br />

duty <strong>of</strong> secrecy and <strong>the</strong> limitations on banking secrecy.<br />

Conflicts are flaring up, for instance, between <strong>the</strong> legal views <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> German tax<br />

authorities and <strong>the</strong> civil-law provisions on banking secrecy in Germany’s neighboring<br />

countries, including Switzerland, Austria, Luxembourg and Liechtenstein. It is<br />

impossible to ignore <strong>the</strong> fact that, in <strong>the</strong> main, banking secrecy is most extensive<br />

in <strong>the</strong>se countries that share a border with Germany. Luxembourg’s “tight-lipped”<br />

approach to banking secrecy surpasses even Switzerland’s. According to <strong>the</strong> former<br />

German Minister <strong>of</strong> Finance, Peer Steinbrück, who attempted to put Switzerland<br />

under considerable pressure in early 2009, and German finance <strong>of</strong>ficials, <strong>the</strong> explanation<br />

for <strong>the</strong> stronger emphasis on banking secrecy in <strong>the</strong>se countries can only be<br />

<strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> diverting international finance flows to <strong>the</strong>ir own countries. 4 Whe<strong>the</strong>r this<br />

view <strong>of</strong> things is accurate needs to be examined.<br />

<strong>Banking</strong> Secrecy, <strong>the</strong> Investigation <strong>of</strong> Tax Avoidance, Tax<br />

Evasion, Money Laundering, and <strong>the</strong> Discussion Around<br />

<strong>the</strong> Swiss “<strong>Banking</strong> Secret”<br />

It is well known that banking secrecy in Switzerland is protected more insistently<br />

and more extensively than in o<strong>the</strong>r industrialized countries. <strong>The</strong>refore it is interesting<br />

to discuss <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “banking secret” with reference to <strong>the</strong> example <strong>of</strong><br />

Switzerland. <strong>The</strong> conditions under which Swiss banking secrecy can be breached are<br />

very restrictive. <strong>Banking</strong> secrecy cannot be penetrated by tax law. This is <strong>the</strong> critical<br />

difference <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> USA and Germany: Switzerland adheres to <strong>the</strong> tenet that nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> revenue authorities in probing <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> Swiss citizens nor <strong>the</strong><br />

interest <strong>of</strong> foreign fiscal authorities in information about <strong>the</strong>ir citizens’ accounts in<br />

Swiss banks can override banking secrecy. In American law, banking secrecy enjoys<br />

money participates in that personal sphere <strong>of</strong> legal protection. <strong>The</strong> norm governing <strong>the</strong> confidentiality<br />

<strong>of</strong> banking relationships is <strong>the</strong>refore: ‘It is a fundamental ethical obligation to leave a person<br />

undisturbed in his private and intimate sphere [...] Secrets should be kept.’ ” (Ibid., p. 17).<br />

4 Cf. CAHL and KLOS (1993), p. 32.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!