Deliverable 4.4 - INSEAD CALT

AtGentive IST-4-027529-STP - Attentive Agents for Collaborative Learnerssignificant (P=0.0235) in the sample including only the Experimental groups (table 12), butnot in the sample including only the Control groups (table 13).Independent VariableFisher’s Exact Test (P-value)Questions_asked (recoded:0->0, 1,…7->1) 1.0000Intro (recoded: 0.0598Good_goal 0.7458Cc :( recoded:0,..,5->0,6,..10->1) 0.0143Table 11 - Tasks in the learning sequence vs the questionnaire score (questions)(recoded: 0,1,2,..,5->0, 6,7,..17->1) for the Whole SampleIndependent VariableFisher’s Exact Test (P-value)Questions_asked (recoded:0->0, 1,…7->1) 0.4454Intro: (recoded:0,…,9->0, 10->1) 0.1358Good_goal 0.6132Cc: (recoded:0,..,5->0,6,..10->1) 0.0235Table 12 - Tasks in the learning sequence vs the questionnaire score (questions)(recoded: 0,1,2,..,5->0, 6,7,..17->1) for the Experimental groupIndependent VariableFisher’s Exact Test (P-value)Questions_asked: (recoded:0->0, 1,…7->1) 0.4244Intro: (recoded:0,…,9->0, 10->1) 0.2519Good_goal 1.0000Cc: (recoded:0,..,5->0,6,..10->1) 0.2576Table 13 - Tasks in the learning sequence vs the questionnaire score (questions)(recoded: 0,1,2,..,5->0, 6,7,..17->1) for the Control groupOnce again, the correlation holds for the children in the Experimental group but not for thechildren in the Control group, indicating that the system may have contributed to the creationof these effects between the different parts of the learning process.3.4. Overall interactions between different parts of the learning processIn order to gain a better understanding of how the main variables describing the learningprocess interacted, we performed a bivariate correlation analysis over the completesample (table 14) as well as over the Experimental and Control samples (tables 15, and16).Del 4.4: AtGentive Final Evaluation Report – Appendix C page 12