12.07.2015 Views

Agronomijas v stis - Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte

Agronomijas v stis - Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte

Agronomijas v stis - Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to – 30 ° C and the snow layer was very thin, in some places it did not exist at all. March was verywarm in Latvia (the warmest of the last 100 years). The air temperature was +17 – 19 ° C, but at theend of month snow in the Aluksne district was observed. After such changeable weather conditionsduring the winter uprights were damaged very hard in the Aluksne district in comparison with otherinspected cranberry plantations in Latvia. In April there was very little rainfall in the Liepaja andRiga districts. May was very hot (25 – 30 ° C) and dry in the Riga district, but in other cranberryplantations was rich rainfall. In June the temperature throughout Latvia was very high up to 5 – 6° C over the average standard and significant rain was observed in the Liepaja, Kuldiga and Talsidistricts, but in the Riga and Aluksne districts first rainfall was only June 14 th and 17 th . Although allinspected cranberry plantations had irrigation systems, probably drought affected growth of theupright and development of the blossoms. During the cranberry flowering time in the Liepajadistrict it was very hot 27 – 30 ° C and wet. The rainfall exceeded three times norm of the month,rainfall was in the Kuldiga and Cesis districts as well. These conditions were favorable for parasiticdiseases, including flower blight and berry rot in the field and in storage. Berry formation wasaffected by heat in August in the Cesis and Aluksne districts, but beneficial conditions for thecranberry growth were in the Talsi and Kuldiga districts. There was rainfall in September in theTalsi, Kuldiga and Riga districts, but in the Aluksne was very dry and hot up to 6 – 7 ° C over thestandard norm. High rainfall amount could increase infection by fungi for berry rot development inthe Riga, Kuldiga and Talsi districts. (www.meteo.lv)From rotted berries in storage fungi Fusiccocum putrefaciens (end rot), Physalopora vaccinii(blotch rot), Phyllosticta elongata (botryosphaeria fruit rot), Allantophomopsis cytisporea (blackrot), Phomopsis vaccinii (viscid rot), Coleophoma empetri (ripe rot), Botrytis cinerea (yellow rot),Discosia artocreas (discosia fruit rot), Pestalotia vaccinii (pestalotia fruit rot) were detected.From inspected cranberry plantations in storage end rot caused by Fusicoccum putrefaciens was themost widespread (Figure 4). End rot developed very quickly during first months (December –January) in storage, and further incidence of berry rot decreased. The ripe rot (causal agentColeophoma empetri) mostly developed during the first months as well, but botryosphaeria fruit rotcaused by Phyllosticta elongata and blotch rot caused by Physalopora vaccinii mostly appeared inMarch. Causal agents of berry rot had different incubation periods. It is important for cranberrygrowers, if the end rot, which is economically the most important disease, was not spread duringthe previously year, fresh berries could be stored until January, other berry rots did not produceimportant material loses.2015%1050end of December end of January end of February end of MarchFusicoccum putrefaciens Phyllosticta elongata Coleophoma empetriPhysalospora vaccinii Allantophomopsis cytisporea Phomopsis vacciniiFigure 4. Causal agents of berry rot spread during storage, %.136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!