Agronomijas v stis - Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte

Felsıtárkány 1 has the heaviest seed: 0.41 g, but it has only 1.89 g fruit weight. The Kisgyır 1,Szinpetri 2, Felsıtárkány 3, Kisgyır 3 and Szinpetri 1 samples have similar values, but theSzinpetri 1 and Szinpetri 2 samples have the fruit weigh on the 1 st and 3 rd place. The lightest seedbelonged to the Szögliget 1 sample (0.27 g) and the Varbóc 3, Kisgyır 2, Varbóc 2,Tornaszentandrás 1 and Szögliget 3 are significantly not different. Priszter (1990) described thetypic (f. mas) cornel seed weight about 0.2 g. Demir et al. (2003) examined 6 types and found theseed weight between 0.14 – 0.37 g; and Brindza et al. (2007) reported 0.11 – 0.55 g seed weight ofcornel. We measured the cornel seed weight between 0.27 – 0.41 g similar to the references. Theresults of flesh weight measurement gave nearly the same order of samples as the fruit weight did.Between the two attributes there is a significant correlation illustrated in figure 2. The mean of theflesh weight of samples is 1.61 g; the means of 9 samples are not significantly different from thisvalue. Five-five samples are positively and negatively different from this value in a significant way.The heaviest flesh weight belonged to Szinpetri 2 sample (2.45 g) and Kács 1 sample is similar toit. The Kács 2 sample had the lightest flesh weight 0.88 g, significantly different from all samples.The mean of flesh proportion of the 19 samples was 81.93 %, but the values of each sample werescattered on a wide range from a 72.93 % to 86.66 %. The data, found in the references, are alsovaried on similar wide range as Ercisli et al. (2006) recorded in natural populations 79 – 88 % andBrindza et al. (2007) reported between 80 and 87 %. Our 18 samples were similar to these results,but Kács 2 with 72.93 % flesh ratio was remarkably low. This could be due to the flesh stackedinseparably to the seed. The highest flesh ratio belonged to the Kács 1 sample. This fact proves thatcornels even growing on the same locus can show great variability.Table 1. The results of measurement combined with the results of ANOVAFruit SeedFruitName ofFlesh ProportionFruit widthweight weightlengthsamplesweight (g) of flesh (%)(mm)(g) (g)(mm)Profile indexFelsıtárkány 1 1.89 fgh 0.41 a 1.47 ghi 78.05 jk 16.31 ef 13.64 b 1.2Felsıtárkány 2 1.97 ef 0.37 bcde 1.6 efg 81.4 fg 18.64 bc 13.01 cde 1.43Felsıtárkány 3 1.71 hij 0.4 ab 1.31 ijk 76.59 k 18.47 c 11.9 i 1.55Kács 1 2.6 b 0.34 defg 2.26 a 86.66 a 19.37 ab 14.67 a 1.32Kács2 1.15 k 0.32 fgh 0.83 l 63.95 l 16.81 de 10.41 j 1.62Kisgyır 1 1.97 ef 0.41 a 1.56f g 78.86 ij 20.02 a 12.34 fghi 1.62Kisgyır 2 2.05 def 0.3 ghij 1.75 cde 85.18 abc 16.93 de 13.57 bc 1.25Kisgyır 3 1.9 fgh 0.38 abc 1.52 fgh 79.71 hi 18.36 c 12.6 efg 1.46Kisgyır 4 2.15 de 0.31 fghi 1.84 bcd 85.46 abc 18.57 c 13.59 b 1.37Szinpetri 1 2.4 bc 0.38 abcd 2.03 b 84.35 cd 18.64 bc 13.58 b 1.38Szinpetri 2 2.85 a 0.4 ab 2.45 a 85.82 abc 19.85 a 14.58 a 1.37Szögliget 1 1.74 ghi 0.27 j 1.48 ghi 84.41 cd 15.54 g 12.49 efgh 1.24Szögliget 2 2.21 cd 0.33 efgh 1.89 bc 85.13 bc 17.38 d 12.66 efg 1.38Szögliget 3 1.97 ef 0.27 ij 1.69 def 86.04 ab 17.24 d 13.27 bcd 1.3Tornaszentandrás1 1.73 gh i 0.29 hij 1.44 ghij 83.11 de 17 de 12.57 efg 1.35Tornaszentandrás2 1.95 efg 0.35 cdef 1.6 efg 81.73 ef 18.32 c 12.83 def 1.43Varbóc 1 1.68 hij 0.32 fgh 1.36 hijk 80.68 fgh 15.72 fg 12.1 ghi 1.3Varbóc 2 1.5 j 0.29 hij 1.21 k 80.37 fgh 15.43 g 11.98 hi 1.29Varbóc 3 1.56 ij 0.3 ghij 1.26 jk 80.17 ghi 17.08 d 10.65 j 1.61mean 1.95 0.34 1.61 81.93 17.67 12.76 1.4p-value5.5E-29 2.9E-28 2.2E-33 2.6E-56 8.9E-18 2.1E-12 3.6E-48SD5% 0.22 0.04 0.19 1.5 0.75 0.56 0.04The mean of the fruit length of all samples was 17.67 mm. Seven samples were not significantlydifferent, seven samples were different in a positive direction and five were negative compared to90