tālākai pārbaudei, tomēr ir nepieciešams novērot daudz vairāk paraugu, lai atrastu labu šėirni, kurair piemērota vietējiem klimatiskajiem apstākĜiem.Key words: cornel, fruit parameters, flesh ratioIntroductionThe cornel (European cornel, cornelian cherry, Cornus mas L.) is a medium to large deciduousshrub or small tree growing to 5 – 12 m tall. The fruit is an oblong red drupe containing a singleseed. The fruit is edible, it has an acidic flavour which is best described as a mixture of cranberryand sour cherry; it is mainly used for making jam, makes an excellent sauce and also can be eatendried. The cornel is a relatively new species in the circle of the fruit breeders and growers. In thosecountries, where cornel has native populations with high variability and valuable genetic sources,with the mapping and selection of precious specimens, the cultivar breeding has already begun(Priszter, 1990). In the Ukraine, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Austria, France, Germany, Poland and Turkeya systematic collecting, selecting and breeding program has started in the last years (Klimenko,2004). In Bulgaria, Poland, and Romania there are several selected cultivars and in Slovakia evenbreeded cultivars are available as for instance ’Santana’, ’Titus,’ ’Ovidus’, etc... (Pirc, 1992;Porpaczy, 1997; Sipos, 2002; Zeitlhöfer, 2002; Porpáczy, 2004; Klimenko, 2004). In the KievBotanical Garden were bred several cultivars which became popular in the USA named ’Pioneer’,’Elegant’, ’Red-star’ (Zeitlhöfler, 2002). According to Reich’s (2004) study, the cultivars bred bySvetlana Klimenko are very delicious (’Elegant’, ’Pioneer’, ’Red Star’, ’Siretski’, ’Vavilov’). Themain cultivars of the Russian cornel plantations are ’Ispolinskij’, ’Karazogal’, ’Kyrymzy-zogal’,’Gjul-zogal’ and since 1990, two Danish cultivars were introduced ’Macrocarpa’ and ’ Cormas’(Zeitlhöfer, 2002). In Hungary between 1972 and 1981 cornel collecting and processing was on top(Szepesi, 1983), but in the near future, large-scale production is expected with the promotion ofcultivar evaluation and wider cultivation, because cornel grows well in relatively dry soils and iseasy to harvest by shaking (Sipos, 2002). However, cornel can be collected but is also valuable forbio production, because they are not damaged by dangerous pests. 50 years ago, Nyékes (1953)described a Hungarian form of Cornus mas called forma csaszloiensis. It has scarlet red drupes,weight is about 2.7 – 4 g, and the size is about 21 – 27 x 12 – 17 mm. There is only one Hungariancornel cultivar in ornamental use, called ’Autumn Fire’. Its fruits are pear shaped and 4 – 5 g heavy(Priszter, 1990). Priszter (1962) described 11 types of shape and size of the cornel fruits. The mostwell spread types are the forma mas, the f. macrocarpa, and the f. sphaerocarpa. Szepesi (1983)pressed for plantations of wild trees, but because of the modified lifestyle and customs, thecollecting does not ensure enough fruits for industry. Plantations could be established on suchareas, where wood production is not economic. Generally cornel and the other (so-called) forestfruits are pioneer plants. These could be a kind of „fruit bearing forests” near human settlementswith a double interest: 1. providing a concentrated fruit collecting area; and 2. using the soil andenvironment protecting function of the shrubs. Cornel is prolific but teems unevenly. To turnproductive it takes 5 – 6 years, then bears generally (30 kg plant -1 ) 7 – 11 t ha -1 . The fruits can beharvested by hand or shakers for tart cherry. (Porpáczy, 1999; Gilbert and Lorraine, 2003).Propagation is difficult by seeds; they need cold stratification (Priszter, 1990). However, seedlingsare different from mother plants, for the preservation of the attributes of the mother plant it is betterto propagate by suckers, division, cuttings or grafting (Priszter, 1990; Pirc, 1992; Schmidt et al.,1996). Fruit collectors are making from cornel berries delicious palinka (a kind of spirit) and jam.The needs of the processing industry and the market is larger than the collecting can provide,therefore the culturing of new cultivars would be advisable (Makai and Balázs, 2002). Our purposein this study was to show that there are several valuable and variable individuals in the Hungariancornel population, which have outstanding qualities. This might be the first step for furtherexamination and probably the start of the breeding work.Materials and MethodsWe examined the drupes of wild cornel genotypes, collecting samples from the area of ourhometown (the Karsts of Aggtelek and the Bükk-hill southern slopes). In both area the collectingand the use of the fruits in daily cuisine is remarkable. Our study is useful for the evaluation of88
each type, and for comparison samples to each other, but not suitable to give a general synopsis ofcornel populations in the observed area, because the number of samples was very small. Thelocation of the sampled bushes are far from each other (a few 10 km-s) and the local climaticfactors in some cases were quite different for characterization of the locus, but the average of allsample is eligible for comparing to the data of studies in the surrounding countries. The samplename is the name of the town near the sampling place. At each place we took sample from morethan one bush, because the fruit size and colour is very various even on the plants that are growingat the same location, these were marked with a number of the order in the sample name. Thecollection places were near to the following 7 towns, (the number of observed bushes is written inbrackets): Szögliget (3), Szinpetri (2), Varbóc (3), Tornaszentandrás (2), Kács (2), Kisgyır (4),Felsıtárkány (3); all together there are 19 cornel bushes. The samples were harvested between 9 thand 24 th of September in 2006. Only the fully ripe, easily separable, healthy, good quality fruitswere collected. In the measurement only 20 pieces of randomly selected fruits were examined.Each of the 20 fruits was measured one by one within 24hrs of the harvest. The measured attributeswere the followings: weight of fruit in grams, weight of seed (g), length and width of fruit(millimetres). Then the next attributes were calculated: flesh weight (g), proportion of flesh(percentage) and profile index. For weight measuring, we used an OHAUS EXPLORER balance totwo places of decimals. The width and length were measured by calliper square (1/20) to one placeof decimals. The flesh weight was calculated with this formula: fruit weight minus seed weightequal to flesh weight. The flesh ratio (%) equal to ((fruit weight minus seed weight) divided byfruit weight) multiplied by 100 and the profile index is equal to the fruit length devided by thefruit width. For data registration Microsoft Excel was used, analysis of one-factor variance andanalysis of regression was used for the evaluation. The significant difference was calculated at 5%of error.Results and DiscussionTable 1 shows all the measured and calculated data of samples. The mean of the weight of allsamples is 1.95g, comparing to it, 10 samples are not significantly different, 4 samples arepositively significant. The Szinpetri 2 sample has an outstandingly high value (2.85 g) in a positivedirection. The Kács 2 sample shows the lowest average weight (1.2 g), being the negativesignificance peak. According to the data of references, the natural cornel populations have a fruitweight between 1.5 – 4.12 g (Demir et al., 2003), 1.46 – 3.81 g (Ercisli et al., 2006), 0.55 – 3.44 g(Brindza et al., 2007). Priszter (1990) found that forma mas type has a weight of about 1.4 g.Karadeniz (2002) reported that the fruit weight of selected types was 3.08 – 3.71 g. In anotherstudy Pirlak et al. (2003) measured 2.9 – 5.2 g. Our data comparing the references is similar, butthere was no outstandingly heavy weight. The order of the weight of the seed does not follow theorder of the fruit weight; the correlation between them is not significant (Figure 1).Weight of seed (g)0.50.450.40.350.30.25y = 0.04x + 0.25r = 0.360.21 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3Weight of fruit (g)szögliget1szögliget2szögliget3színpetri1színpetri2varbóc1varbóc2varbóc3tornaszentadrás1tornaszentadrás2kács1kács2kisgyır1kisgyır2kisgyır3kisgyır4felsıtárkány1felsıtárkány2felsıtárkány3Figure 1. Correlation of fruit weight and seed weight of cornel samples89
- Page 3 and 4:
Conference Organizing CommitteeChai
- Page 6 and 7:
15 Pormale J., Osvalde A. and Nolle
- Page 8 and 9:
were established in 1985. Nowadays,
- Page 10 and 11:
10,1-15 ha7%15,1-20 ha7%< 20,1 ha0%
- Page 12 and 13:
In less than half the surveyed farm
- Page 14:
economical and biochemical characte
- Page 17 and 18:
investigated European cranberry acc
- Page 19 and 20:
fruit of V. opulus has different am
- Page 21 and 22:
As several authors have stated (Koz
- Page 23 and 24:
KopsavilkumsVaccinium ăints kultū
- Page 25 and 26:
maintained in a mist chamber with v
- Page 27 and 28:
period and produce vigorous vegetat
- Page 29 and 30:
38. Marcotrigiano M. and McGlew S.P
- Page 31 and 32:
of changes in the typological struc
- Page 33 and 34:
fall from 2 to 3 and that for heath
- Page 35 and 36:
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY BREEDINGAUGSTKR
- Page 37 and 38: Southern and Intermediate highbush
- Page 39 and 40: and anatomically they belong to fal
- Page 41 and 42: The levels of flavonols are more co
- Page 43 and 44: 21. Polashock J.J., Griesbach R.J.,
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 1. A general scheme of the N
- Page 47 and 48: 5. Åkerström A., Forsum Å., Rump
- Page 49 and 50: species and studying the efficiency
- Page 51 and 52: Thus, it has been determined that t
- Page 53 and 54: CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF HIGHBUSH BL
- Page 55 and 56: lueberry cultivars were collected f
- Page 57 and 58: Ascorbic acid, mg 100ḡ 112108642a
- Page 59 and 60: 6. Saftner R., Polashock J., Ehlenf
- Page 61 and 62: Materials and methodsThe experiment
- Page 63 and 64: The titrable acids content of the e
- Page 65 and 66: There was a significant correlation
- Page 67 and 68: Nichenametla et al., 2006), human n
- Page 69 and 70: The contribution of V. macrocarpon
- Page 71 and 72: 11. Kong J. M., Chia L. S., Goh N.K
- Page 73 and 74: isothermically at 70°C for 5 min,
- Page 75 and 76: IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF SEVERAL VAC
- Page 77 and 78: 16BM ean N o. of shoots/explant1412
- Page 79 and 80: Figure 2. Axillary shoot regenerati
- Page 81 and 82: evaluate the blueberries supply wit
- Page 83 and 84: espectively). It should be stressed
- Page 85 and 86: lueberry appear to play a conclusiv
- Page 87: 15. Reimann C., Kollen F., Frengsta
- Page 91 and 92: the mean. Kisgyır 1 sample has the
- Page 93 and 94: 13. Porpáczy A. (1999) A húsos so
- Page 95 and 96: was medium (0.014 - 0.017 g kg -1 s
- Page 97 and 98: ‘Salaspils Ražīgā’. Vigorous
- Page 99 and 100: KopsavilkumsEiropas melleĦu (Vacci
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 2. Chemometric PCA of 32 blu
- Page 103 and 104: References1. Baloga D.W., Vorsa N.,
- Page 105 and 106: obtained from fruits of black choke
- Page 107 and 108: In our opinion, the best estimate a
- Page 109 and 110: cuttings also varies markedly with
- Page 111 and 112: shoots shorter than 10 mm were not
- Page 113 and 114: 14. Ostrolucka M.G., Gajdosova A, L
- Page 115 and 116: „Metos RG-350” (http://www.meto
- Page 117 and 118: 500480Phenols,mg 100g -146044042040
- Page 119 and 120: SHORT INFORMATION ABOUT THE HISTORY
- Page 121 and 122: Evaluation of cultivars. After the
- Page 123 and 124: the number of pistils (female clone
- Page 125 and 126: Table 2. Number of flowers per harv
- Page 127 and 128: ResultsFirst time upright dieback i
- Page 129 and 130: grew rapidly on PDA at 20 - 24 o C.
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 9. Conidia of Physalospora v
- Page 133 and 134: References1. CABI, EPPO, (1997) Dia
- Page 135 and 136: Results und DiscussionBerries were
- Page 137 and 138: In literature Caruso eds. and Гop
- Page 139 and 140:
the total area under a cranberry ma
- Page 141 and 142:
Skilled works on development of the
- Page 143 and 144:
Tika atrastas dažas būtiskas ats
- Page 145 and 146:
appears to maintain a quite low lev
- Page 147 and 148:
8. Garkava - Gustavson L.,Persson H