(BM-C) formulated in the author’s laboratory (Debnath and McRae, 2001a). Debnath (2005a)observed that TDZ supported shoot proliferation in lingonberries at low concentrations (0.1 to 1µM) but inhibited shoot elongation. However, usable shoots were obtained within 4 weeks bytransferring shoot clusters to the culture medium containing 1µM zeatin. In the lingonberry, shootproliferation is greatly influenced by explant orientation, changing the orientation of explants fromvertically upright to horizontal increases the axillary shoot number, but decreases shoot height andleaf number per shoot (Debnath, 2005a). Debnath (2005b) observed that the best response wasafforded by sucrose at 20 g l -1 both in terms of explant response and shoot development potential,although glucose supported shoot growth equally well, and in a wild clone at 10 g l -1 it resulted inbetter in vitro growth than sucrose.The first adventitious shoot regeneration from lingonberry leaves was described by Debnath andMcRae (2002). Later, the regeneration efficiency has been much improved by Debnath (2005c)where leaf explants were cultured on the 1-5 µM TDZ-containing a nutrient medium for 8 weeksfor bud and shoot regeneration followed by transferring on to the medium containing 1-2 µM zeatinfor shoot elongation. Adventitious shoots have also been regenerated from hypocotyl segments ofseedlings from open-pollinated seeds of lingonberry cultivars and a wild clone (Debnath, 2003b).Multiple bud and shoot regeneration can be obtained using apical segments of the hypocotyl fromin vitro-grown lingonberry seedlings by incorporating 5-10 µM TDZ in the regeneration medium.Such TDZ-induced buds can be proliferated and elongated on a shoot proliferation mediumcontaining 1-2 µM zeatin and 20 g l -1 sucrose. Callus, bud, and shoot regeneration frequency, callusgrowth, and the number of buds and shoots per regenerating explant depend not only on thespecific segment of the hypocotyl, but also on the parental genotype (Debnath, 2003b).For rooting, 3 to 4 cm long in vitro-derived shoots are excised just above the original explant,dipped in 39.4 mM IBA powder, planted in a 2 peat : 1 perlite (v/v) medium and maintained in ahumidity chamber [(22 ∀ 2ΕC, 95 % RH, 16 h photoperiod, 55 µmol m -2 s -1 photosynthetic photonflux (PPF)]. In vitro proliferated shoots root easily within 4 weeks. Plantlets can be acclimatizedby gradually lowering the humidity over 2 to 3 weeks and hardened-off plants can be maintained inthe greenhouse at 20 ∀ 2ΕC, 85 % RH, and 16 h photoperiod at a maximum PPF of 90 µmol m -2 s -1(Debnath and McRae, 2001a, 2002; Debnath, 2003a, b; 2005a, b, c).Cloudberry. In vitro propagation of cloudberry has been reported in a gelled medium throughaxillary shoot initiation from seedling explants (Thiem, 2001) and through meristem cultures(Martinussen et al., 2004). When meristem cultures were sub-cultured from clusters of 3 – 5shoots, approximately 70 and 50 shoots were produced per cluster within 6 weeks at 8.9 µM BAPfor the female cv. ‘Fjellgull’ and the male cv. ‘Apollen’, respectively. The addition of 5.5 µMgibberellic acid (GA3) reduced the number of shoots. Auxins (IBA, NAA) promoted rootdevelopment in vitro, but inhibited the formation of new shoots (Martinussen et al., 2004).Debnath (2007c) established a protocol for the in vitro culture of wild cloudberry clones using abioreactor system combined with a gelled medium. Cultures were established on a modifiedcranberry (V. macrocarpon Ait.) tissue culture medium containing 8.9 µM BAP. The addition of5.8 µM GA3 in 8.9 µM BAP-contained medium improved shoot proliferation. TDZ supportedrapid shoot proliferation at low concentration (1.1 µM) but induced a 20 to 30 % hyperhydricity ina plastic airlift bioreactor system containing a liquid medium. The bioreactor-multipliedhyperhydric shoots were transferred to a gelled medium containing 8.9 µM BAP and 5.8 µM GA3and produced normal shoots within 4 weeks of culture. Proliferated shoots were rooted on a pottingmedium with a 65 % to 75 % survivability rate of rooted plants. Growth and morphology ofmicropropagated plants. Increased branching and vigorous vegetative growth are often noted inplants produced through in vitro culture. Morrison et al. (2000) observed that micropropagatedlowbush blueberry plants from shoots that passed through several subcultures produced ten-foldmore rhizomes than those of stem cuttings. The micropropagated lowbush blueberry plantsproduced longer and more stems with more leaves per stem than the conventional cuttings(Debnath, 2007b).Softwood cutting-derived ‘Herbert’ highbush plants grew more slowly and produced less andshorter shoots than micropropagated ones, although the majority of cutting-propagated plantsdeveloped flowers earlier, flowered more abundantly and bore larger berries than those of tissueculture plants (Litwiczuk et al., 2005). Micropropagated cranberry plants have an excellent juvenile26
period and produce vigorous vegetative growth (mostly runners) during their first season but do notproduce flowers until their third growing season (Serres and McCown, 1994). Micropropagated‘Bergman’, ‘Pilgrim’ and ‘Stevens’ plants produced more runners and uprights with more leavesper upright than the conventional cuttings (Debnath, 2008).Debnath (2005d, 2006b) observed that the in vitro-derived lingonberry plants produced morestems, leaves and rhizomes than the conventional cuttings. Under field condition, rhizomeproduction and total plant weight were greater for tissue culture plants than for stem cuttings in thelingonberry cultivar, ‘Sanna’ (Gustavsson and Stanys, 2000). After 4 years of growth, the tissueculture plants of ‘Splendor’ and ‘Erntedank’ lingonberries produced berries with more antioxidantactivity, although the berry diameter, number and yield per plant were higher in the stem cuttingplants (Foley and Debnath, 2007).ConclusionsThe commercial propagation of the Vaccinium species and cloudberry by tissue culture isbecoming increasingly common as it is a reliable and efficient method, especially for the rapidintroduction of new cultivars. In breeding programs, the technique can provide advantages in: (i)the mass production of elite selections and for analysis in a replicated trial of new releases, (ii)germplasm conservation, (iii) accelerating the breeding process by in vitro selection.Large-scale liquid cultures combined with automated bioreactors can eliminate most manualhandling in micropropagation and decrease production costs significantly. Cultures in liquidmedium are advantageous for several plant species but may limit the gas exchange of the plantmaterials and often cause asphyxia and hyperhydricity, resulting in malformed plants and loss ofmaterial.True-to-type propagules and genetic stability are prerequisites for the application ofmicropropagation. Molecular markers are powerful tools in the genetic identification of clonalfidelity. Special classes of markers including restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP),random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), arbitrary primed PCR (AP-PCR), DNA amplifiedfingerprinting (DAF), simple (short) sequence repeat (SSR), short tandem repeat (STR), sequencecharacterized amplified region (SCAR), sequence-tagged sites (STSs), amplified fragment lengthpolymorphism (AFLP) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) are appropriate for geneticanalysis of tissue culture-raised plants. RAPD and ISSR marker analyses have been developed inthe author’s laboratory to identify genetic diversity in the Vaccinium species (Debnath, 2007d,2009b) and in cloudberry germplasm (Debnath, 2007e), and can be used to study the clonal fidelityof the micropropagated plants of these species.References1. Amakura Y., Okada M., Tsuji S. and Tonogai Y. (2000) High-performance liquid chromatographicdetermination with photodiode array detection of ellagic acid in fresh and processed fruits. Journal ofChromatography A, 896, pp.87-93.2. Ballington J.R. (2001) Collection, utilization, and preservation of genetic resources in Vaccinium.HortScience, 36, pp.213-220.3. Cao X., Hammerschlag F.A. and Douglass L (2002) A two-step pretreatment significantly enhances shootorganogenesis from leaf explants of highbush blueberry cv. Bluecrop. HortScience, 37, pp.819-821.4. Debnath S.C. (2003a) Micropropagation of Small Fruits. In: Jain S.M. and Ishii K. (eds) Micropropagation ofWoody Trees and Fruits, Kluwer Academic Publications, Dordrecht, Germany, pp.465-506.5. Debnath S.C. (2003b) Improved shoot organogenesis from hypocotyl segments of lingonberry (Vacciniumvitis-idaea L.). In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant, 39, pp.490-495.6. Debnath, S.C. (2004) In vitro culture of lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). Small FruitsReview, 3, pp.393-408.7. Debnath S.C. (2005a) Micropropagation of lingonberry: influence of genotype, explant orientation, andovercoming TDZ-induced inhibition of shoot elongation using zeatin. HortScience, 40, pp.185-188.8. Debnath S.C. (2005b) Effects of carbon source and concentration on development of lingonberry (Vacciniumvitis-idaea L.) shoots cultivated in vitro from nodal explants. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology –Plant, 41, pp.145-150.9. Debnath S.C. (2005c) A two-step procedure for adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro-derivedlingonberry leaves: shoot induction with TDZ and shoot elongation using zeatin. HortScience, 40, pp.189-192.10. Debnath S.C. (2005d) Morphological development of lingonberry as affected by in vitro and ex vitropropagation methods and source propagule. HortScience, 40, pp.760-763.27
- Page 3 and 4: Conference Organizing CommitteeChai
- Page 6 and 7: 15 Pormale J., Osvalde A. and Nolle
- Page 8 and 9: were established in 1985. Nowadays,
- Page 10 and 11: 10,1-15 ha7%15,1-20 ha7%< 20,1 ha0%
- Page 12 and 13: In less than half the surveyed farm
- Page 14: economical and biochemical characte
- Page 17 and 18: investigated European cranberry acc
- Page 19 and 20: fruit of V. opulus has different am
- Page 21 and 22: As several authors have stated (Koz
- Page 23 and 24: KopsavilkumsVaccinium ăints kultū
- Page 25: maintained in a mist chamber with v
- Page 29 and 30: 38. Marcotrigiano M. and McGlew S.P
- Page 31 and 32: of changes in the typological struc
- Page 33 and 34: fall from 2 to 3 and that for heath
- Page 35 and 36: HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY BREEDINGAUGSTKR
- Page 37 and 38: Southern and Intermediate highbush
- Page 39 and 40: and anatomically they belong to fal
- Page 41 and 42: The levels of flavonols are more co
- Page 43 and 44: 21. Polashock J.J., Griesbach R.J.,
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 1. A general scheme of the N
- Page 47 and 48: 5. Åkerström A., Forsum Å., Rump
- Page 49 and 50: species and studying the efficiency
- Page 51 and 52: Thus, it has been determined that t
- Page 53 and 54: CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF HIGHBUSH BL
- Page 55 and 56: lueberry cultivars were collected f
- Page 57 and 58: Ascorbic acid, mg 100ḡ 112108642a
- Page 59 and 60: 6. Saftner R., Polashock J., Ehlenf
- Page 61 and 62: Materials and methodsThe experiment
- Page 63 and 64: The titrable acids content of the e
- Page 65 and 66: There was a significant correlation
- Page 67 and 68: Nichenametla et al., 2006), human n
- Page 69 and 70: The contribution of V. macrocarpon
- Page 71 and 72: 11. Kong J. M., Chia L. S., Goh N.K
- Page 73 and 74: isothermically at 70°C for 5 min,
- Page 75 and 76: IN VITRO PROPAGATION OF SEVERAL VAC
- Page 77 and 78:
16BM ean N o. of shoots/explant1412
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 2. Axillary shoot regenerati
- Page 81 and 82:
evaluate the blueberries supply wit
- Page 83 and 84:
espectively). It should be stressed
- Page 85 and 86:
lueberry appear to play a conclusiv
- Page 87 and 88:
15. Reimann C., Kollen F., Frengsta
- Page 89 and 90:
each type, and for comparison sampl
- Page 91 and 92:
the mean. Kisgyır 1 sample has the
- Page 93 and 94:
13. Porpáczy A. (1999) A húsos so
- Page 95 and 96:
was medium (0.014 - 0.017 g kg -1 s
- Page 97 and 98:
‘Salaspils Ražīgā’. Vigorous
- Page 99 and 100:
KopsavilkumsEiropas melleĦu (Vacci
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 2. Chemometric PCA of 32 blu
- Page 103 and 104:
References1. Baloga D.W., Vorsa N.,
- Page 105 and 106:
obtained from fruits of black choke
- Page 107 and 108:
In our opinion, the best estimate a
- Page 109 and 110:
cuttings also varies markedly with
- Page 111 and 112:
shoots shorter than 10 mm were not
- Page 113 and 114:
14. Ostrolucka M.G., Gajdosova A, L
- Page 115 and 116:
„Metos RG-350” (http://www.meto
- Page 117 and 118:
500480Phenols,mg 100g -146044042040
- Page 119 and 120:
SHORT INFORMATION ABOUT THE HISTORY
- Page 121 and 122:
Evaluation of cultivars. After the
- Page 123 and 124:
the number of pistils (female clone
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 2. Number of flowers per harv
- Page 127 and 128:
ResultsFirst time upright dieback i
- Page 129 and 130:
grew rapidly on PDA at 20 - 24 o C.
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 9. Conidia of Physalospora v
- Page 133 and 134:
References1. CABI, EPPO, (1997) Dia
- Page 135 and 136:
Results und DiscussionBerries were
- Page 137 and 138:
In literature Caruso eds. and Гop
- Page 139 and 140:
the total area under a cranberry ma
- Page 141 and 142:
Skilled works on development of the
- Page 143 and 144:
Tika atrastas dažas būtiskas ats
- Page 145 and 146:
appears to maintain a quite low lev
- Page 147 and 148:
8. Garkava - Gustavson L.,Persson H