12.07.2015 Views

Agronomijas v stis - Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte

Agronomijas v stis - Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte

Agronomijas v stis - Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In literature Caruso eds. and Гopлeнкo wrote, the black rot (causal agent Allantophomopsiscytisporea) is common in the field or during the first months in storage (Caruso et al., 1995;Гopлeнкo et al., 1996) but in Latvia, black rot was common till the end of March.The incidence level of berry rot was different in each inspected cranberry plantation. End rot(Fusicoccum putrefaciens) was common in the Aluksne, Kuldiga and Cesis districts, but in theRiga and Liepaja districts pathogen was spread very infrequent (Fig. 5). In the cranberry plantationof the Riga district ripe rot (causal agent Coleophoma empetri) was widely spread and in Liepajadistrict botryosphaeria fruit rot (Phyllosticta elongata) and viscid rot (Phomopsis vaccinii) which isa quarantine organism were found. Phomopsis vaccinii was identified in Lithuania in 2002 as well(Kačergius et al., 2004). Blotch rot caused by Physalospora vaccinii in the cranberry plantationlocated in the Talsi district was widely spread, but this rot in the Liepaja district was not observed.In the cranberry plantations were common 5 - 6 causal agents of berry rot, but from samples takenin the cranberry plantation in the Cesis district, developed only three rots - end rot, botryosphaeriafruit rot and blotch rot.%4035302520151050Aluksne dist. Riga dist. Cesis dist. Kuldiga dist. Talsi dist. Liepaja dist.Fusicoccum putrefaciens Phyllosticta elongata Coleophoma empetriPhysalospora vaccinii Allantophomopsis cytisporea Phomopsis vacciniiFigure 5. Causal agents of berry rot spread in different regions in Latvia during storage, %.ConclusionFrom 6 inspected cranberry plantations in Latvia six causal agents of berry rot were detected in thestorage berries. The end rot caused by Fusicoccum putrefaciens was the most widespread.The incidence level of berry rot in all cranberry plantations was not similar; therefore in futureinvestigations should focus on what promotes the fungi in each cranberry plantation.References1. Caruso F. L., Ramsdell D.C., eds., (1995) Compendim of Blueberry and Cranberry Diseases. TheAmerican Phytopathological Society, pp.27-87.2. Kačergius A., Jovaišiene Z., Valiuškaite A. (2004) Phomopsis vaccinii on Vaccinium corymbosum inLithuania. – Botanica Lithuanica, 10 (1), pp.75-80.3. Olatinwo R.O., Hansos E. J., Schilder A. M. C. (2003) A first assessment of the cranberry fruit rotcomplex in Michigan. Plant Disease, 87 (5), pp. 550-556.4. Oudemans P. V., Caruso F. L., Stretch A. W. (1998) Cranberry fruit rot in the northeast: A complexdisease. Plant Disease, 82, pp. 1176-1184.5. Stiles C. M., Oudemans P.V. (1999) Distribution of cranberry feruit-rotting fungi in New Jersey andevidence for non-specific host resistance. Phytophatology, 89, pp. 218-225.6. Гopлeнкo C. B., Бyгa C. B. (1996) Бoлeзни и вpeдитeли клюквы кpyпнoплoднoй. Минск, Нayкa итexникa, 247 c.7. www.meteo.lv137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!