developing a model for integrating safety, quality and productivity in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Relationshipbetween safetyand costRelationshipbetween safetyand timeRelationshipbetween safetyand religionRelationshipbetween safety,quality, andproductivitycontributes2.447 0.273 2.504 0.087 2.420 0.516 2.451 0.2722.599 0.367 2.800 0.311 2.758 0.533 2.623 0.3702.013 0.324 2.467 0.139 1.806 0.542 2.040 0.3471.847 0.512 1.855 0.199 1.485 0.448 1.830 0.493Table 5.11 shows ANOVA results for the differences in the mean values of thecategories. Analysis results showed that F value for each category is less than thecritical value of F 0.05 which equals 3.18 at degrees of freedom (2, 58), and the P-valuefor each category is greater than 0.000, hence, we fail to reject Ho with 95%confidence interval and conclude that there is no difference in the mean value for therespondent answers for the relationship between safety and (quality, productivity,cost, time, and productivity contributes) due to the specialization at significance level=0.05 α .Table 5. 11: ANOVA results for the differences in the mean value of all aspects corresponding toSpecializationCategoriesRelationship between safety and qualityRelationship between safety andproductivityRelationship between safety and costRelationship between safety and timeRelationship between safety and religionRelationship between safety, quality, andproductivity contributesType of relationshipSum of MeandfSquares SquareBetween Groups 0.082 2 0.041Within Groups 10.712 58 0.185Total 10.794 60Between Groups 0.131 2 0.066Within Groups 6.281 58 0.108Total 6.412 60Between Groups 0.018 2 0.009Within Groups 4.436 58 0.076Total 4.454 60Between Groups 0.242 2 0.121Within Groups 7.970 58 0.137Total 8.212 60Between Groups 1.115 2 0.557Within Groups 6.116 58 0.105Total 7.231 60Between Groups 0.376 2 0.188Within Groups 14.194 58 0.245Total 14.570 60The critical value of F 0.05 equal 3.18 at degrees of freedom (2, 58)FSig.(P)0.223 0.8010.606 0.5490.116 0.8910.882 0.4195.287 0.0080.769 0.468175
On the other hand, with regard to the relationship between safety and religion, it isnoticed that F value is greater than F 0.05 ; hence we fail to reject Ha with 95%confidence interval and conclude that there is a difference in the mean value forrespondents’ answers for the relationship between safety and religion.5.4.4 Experience of respondents in the field of SafetyExperience of respondents in the field of Safety has been used as a measurement toolto investigate the relationship between safety and quality. The years of experiencefactor has been grouped into five levels as shown in the questionnaire (i.e. 1 – 5, 6 –10, 11 – 15, 16 – 20, and More than 20). Thus, two hypotheses can be proposed asfollows:Ho: There is no difference in the mean value for the respondent answers for therelationship between safety and (quality, productivity, cost, time, religion) due to theexperience in the field of safety at significance levelα =0.05Ha: There is difference in the mean value for the respondent answers for therelationship between safety and (quality, productivity, cost, time, religion, andproductivity contributes) due to the experience in the field of safety at significancelevelα =0.05Table 5.12 shows the mean and standard deviations for each category correspondingto the experience in the field of safety. For the relationship between safety andquality, it is noticed that the mean of the experience in the field of safety (mean =2.392) correspondence in the level (1 -5) is the largest mean, while the smallest meanof the correspondence (mean = 1.795) lies in the level (More than 20). This meansthat respondents who have 1 -5 years experience in the field of safety support thatthere is a relationship between safety and quality more than other levels of years ofexperience. This may be reasoned to fresh graduates and young professionals joinedtraining courses in the field of safety or studied more specialized courses in the fieldof safety during their university study.176
Page 1:
The Islamic University Of GazaFacul
Page 4 and 5:
AcknowledgementI would like to than
Page 6 and 7:
ملخص البحثتعتبر صن
Page 8 and 9:
Group 3: Study on relationship betw
Page 10 and 11:
List of TablesTable 1: Nonfatal Occ
Page 12 and 13:
List of FiguresFigure 1: Costs and
Page 14 and 15:
Chapter one: Introduction1.1 Constr
Page 16 and 17:
safety. Safety culture contributes
Page 18 and 19:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEWThe p
Page 20 and 21:
The construction industry is often
Page 22 and 23:
Table 1 shows nonfatal occupational
Page 24 and 25:
centered exclusively on the technic
Page 26 and 27:
3. Small size of most construction
Page 28 and 29:
• Quality management: is that asp
Page 30 and 31:
of project management that is requi
Page 32 and 33:
organizational programs aiming at m
Page 34 and 35:
2.2.3 Construction quality in devel
Page 36 and 37:
5. The designers do not consider th
Page 38 and 39:
2.3 Construction ProductivityProduc
Page 40 and 41:
Real Wage TrendsConstruction Traini
Page 42 and 43:
Rework for correcting unsatisfactor
Page 44 and 45:
the importance of measurement as
Page 46 and 47:
productivity sector, because of its
Page 48 and 49:
2.3.7 Construction productivity in
Page 50 and 51:
achieved, with the highest quality,
Page 52 and 53:
Figure 2: Methodology Flowchart39
Page 54 and 55:
Correction for Finite PopulationSS
Page 56 and 57:
nominal and ordinal scales. Nominal
Page 58 and 59:
e. If respondent responses disagree
Page 60 and 61:
Part IV: Linkage between Productivi
Page 62 and 63:
3.7 Pilot StudyWhenever a researche
Page 64 and 65:
Group 1# ItemsP-ValuePearsonSignifi
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Group 2# Itemstime schedule prepara
Page 70 and 71:
Group 3# Itemspsychological pressur
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Group 7to apply safety regulations4
Page 76 and 77:
Local conditions 0.485 0.01Worker p
Page 78 and 79:
Group# of statementsBeforemodificat
Page 80 and 81:
CostTimeReligionImportanceof StudyR
Page 82 and 83:
2. The study is limited to the cont
Page 84 and 85:
This results from the fact that the
Page 86 and 87:
4.2.4 Capital of CompanyTable 4.2 s
Page 88 and 89:
Employees' background may vary acco
Page 90 and 91:
Respondents might have also not bee
Page 92 and 93:
70.00%60.00%42Percentage of respond
Page 94 and 95:
4.3 Part II: Company's policy, safe
Page 96 and 97:
obligatory to provide safety progra
Page 98 and 99:
Percentage of respondents80.00%60.0
Page 100 and 101:
Projects that are planned taking in
Page 102 and 103:
e aware of importance of accident r
Page 104 and 105:
4.3.1 Part III: Linkage between occ
Page 106 and 107:
Safety and quality factors# ofRespo
Page 108 and 109:
Results also show how much importan
Page 110 and 111:
good safety attitudes in people but
Page 112 and 113:
y him mostly well understood and ap
Page 114 and 115:
costs and increased loss-control. T
Page 116 and 117:
project as of high quality in case
Page 118 and 119:
group with RII = 0.717 and was rank
Page 120 and 121:
8. Emergency Preparedness# ofRespon
Page 122 and 123:
general contractor and subcontracto
Page 124 and 125:
"Safety committee is formed to moni
Page 126 and 127:
For a safety program to be properly
Page 128 and 129:
low factor that affects quality (45
Page 130 and 131:
"Many change orders during implemen
Page 132 and 133:
safer. A new worker when oriented w
Page 134 and 135:
"Inclusion of safety into contract
Page 136 and 137:
management can be achieved through
Page 138 and 139: ‘Project Implementation” group
Page 140 and 141: 4.3.2 Part IV: Linkage between occu
Page 142 and 143: GROUP 1: Factors improving producti
Page 144 and 145: more unsafely. Productive workers a
Page 146 and 147: GROUP 3: Local conditionsTable 4.30
Page 148 and 149: nonworking days rarely occur in Gaz
Page 150 and 151: warn workers to avoid them. Workers
Page 152 and 153: ut also when the crew does return t
Page 154 and 155: from a change in worksite condition
Page 156 and 157: Comprehensive worker education thro
Page 158 and 159: directions of safe actions cannot b
Page 160 and 161: "Safety expenditures are very much
Page 162 and 163: ecovering their bankruptcy. Under t
Page 164 and 165: 4.3.4 Part VI: Linkage between occu
Page 166 and 167: is referred to as heat stress. In a
Page 168 and 169: job. They can cover work practices,
Page 170 and 171: "Islam has strengthened principle o
Page 172 and 173: "Decreasing accidents during work a
Page 174 and 175: CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMM
Page 176 and 177: position. This factor belongs to sa
Page 178 and 179: 5.2.3 Safety and CostThis part of t
Page 180 and 181: 5.3 RecommendationsRecommendations
Page 182 and 183: losing contracts because bids that
Page 184 and 185: Table 5. 6: Mean and standard devia
Page 186 and 187: degree support that there is a rela
Page 190 and 191: Table 5. 12: Mean and standard devi
Page 192 and 193: Relationship betweenYes 15 2.4623 0
Page 194 and 195: 5.5 Characteristics of Basic Model
Page 196 and 197: safety rules, safety inspection, pr
Page 198 and 199: Arditi, D., and Mochtar, K., 2000,
Page 200 and 201: Herrero, S., Saldana, M., Del Campo
Page 202 and 203: Koehn, E., Kothari, R., and Pan, C.
Page 204 and 205: Salminen, S. and Saari, J., 1995. M
Page 206 and 207: Annex 1: Questionnaire in English19
Page 208 and 209: 14. Years of experience in the fiel
Page 210 and 211: 22. If Yes, indicate periodweekly b
Page 212 and 213: Study on relationship between safet
Page 214 and 215: Study on relationship between safet
Page 216 and 217: PART VI: LINKAGE BETWEEN OCCUPATION
Page 218 and 219: 5) Safety program for each project6
Page 220 and 221: بسم االله الرحمن ال
Page 222 and 223: الجزء الأول:‏السي
Page 224 and 225: 12. إذا كان الجواب ن
Page 226 and 227: أ)‏دراسة العلاقة
Page 228 and 229: دراسة العلاقة بين ا
Page 230 and 231: الجزءالخامس:‏ علاق
Page 232 and 233: "‎10‎‏.لا يتعارض مب
Page 234 and 235: Annex 3: Images of safety problems
Page 236 and 237: Figure 5: Exacavation activities wh
Page 238 and 239:
Figure 8: Worker is fixing house co
Page 240 and 241:
Figure 12: Piping works without saf
show all

developing a model for integrating safety, quality and productivity in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?