<strong>safety</strong> rules, <strong>safety</strong> <strong>in</strong>spection, provid<strong>in</strong>g PPE, accident documentation, <strong>and</strong>emergency preparedness. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> <strong>quality</strong> management processes arerequired by resources <strong>and</strong> top management <strong>in</strong> order to ensure <strong>quality</strong> is achieved.Such processes <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>quality</strong> assurance, <strong>quality</strong> control, <strong>and</strong> ISO tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g courses.Level ThreeImplementation <strong>and</strong> compliance of <strong>safety</strong> procedures <strong>and</strong> practices are <strong>in</strong>herentcharacteristics of goof <strong>safety</strong> management. Compliance with local <strong>safety</strong> regulationsrequires high commitment towards <strong>safety</strong>, <strong>safety</strong> committees to be organized, <strong>safety</strong><strong>and</strong> health promotion, creation of <strong>safety</strong> program, <strong>and</strong> document<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>compliancepenalties <strong>in</strong> contract <strong>for</strong>ms. Verification <strong>and</strong> assessment processes are important <strong>for</strong>ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>safety</strong> is achieved <strong>and</strong> that violations are documented <strong>and</strong> removed. Throughassessment of accident reports, causes <strong>and</strong> consequences of <strong>safety</strong> violations are<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>and</strong> the method <strong>for</strong> remov<strong>in</strong>g hazards can be uncovered by good<strong>in</strong>vestigation by <strong>safety</strong> specialist or <strong>safety</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eer who is located at workplace.Level FourManagement review of <strong>safety</strong> reports <strong>and</strong> accident reports is necessary <strong>for</strong> thecorrection actions of <strong>safety</strong> policy or <strong>safety</strong> procedures. Top managementcommitment to <strong>safety</strong> assists <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g zero accident theory at workplaceespecially if <strong>in</strong>tegrated with the total commitment of project parties towards <strong>safety</strong>.The leadership style <strong>in</strong> <strong>quality</strong> management is similar to management review <strong>in</strong> <strong>safety</strong>management. The similarity lies at that management review <strong>and</strong> leadership control the<strong>safety</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>quality</strong> processes alternatively.183
ReferencesAbdel-Razek, R., 1998, Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g construction <strong>quality</strong> <strong>in</strong> Egypt: identification<strong>and</strong> relative importance, Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, Construction <strong>and</strong> ArchitecturalManagement, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 220 – 227Abdul-Rahman, H., 1995, Some observations on the management of <strong>quality</strong> amongconstruction professionals <strong>in</strong> the UK, Construction Management <strong>and</strong>Economics, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 485 – 495Abo Mostafa, Z., 2003, Study of the measurement of labor <strong>productivity</strong> <strong>in</strong> thePalest<strong>in</strong>ian construction <strong>in</strong>dustry: The Gaza Strip, unpublished MSc Thesis,Islamic University of Gaza, Palest<strong>in</strong>e.Abohimed, B., 2001, Identify<strong>in</strong>g some management approaches to total <strong>quality</strong>management (TQM) with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial organizations, unpublished MSc. Thesis,University of Wiscons<strong>in</strong>-Stout, USA.Ahmed, S.M, P. Tang, Azhar, S., <strong>and</strong> Irtishad, A., 2002, An Evaluation of SafetyManagement System <strong>in</strong> the Hong Kong Construction Industry Us<strong>in</strong>g TQMPr<strong>in</strong>ciples,” Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of CIB-W65/W55 International Conference,C<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>nati, Ohio, USA.Ahmed, S.M., Azhar, S., <strong>and</strong> Irtishad, A., 2002, Evaluation of Florida GeneralContractors’ Risk Management Practices, Construction Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Journal,Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 4-11, Florida, USAAl Abo Omar, E. <strong>and</strong> Mang<strong>in</strong>, J. C., 2002, A new cost control <strong>model</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicatorsto measure <strong>productivity</strong> on build<strong>in</strong>g sites, Construction Innovation, Vol. 2, pp.83 – 101.Al-Momani, A.H., 2000. Exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g service <strong>quality</strong> with<strong>in</strong> construction processes,Journal of Technovation, Vol. 20, No. 11, pp. 643-651Arditi, D., <strong>and</strong> Gunayd<strong>in</strong>, M., 1997, Total <strong>quality</strong> management <strong>in</strong> the constructionprocess, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 235-243.184
- Page 1:
The Islamic University Of GazaFacul
- Page 4 and 5:
AcknowledgementI would like to than
- Page 6 and 7:
ملخص البحثتعتبر صن
- Page 8 and 9:
Group 3: Study on relationship betw
- Page 10 and 11:
List of TablesTable 1: Nonfatal Occ
- Page 12 and 13:
List of FiguresFigure 1: Costs and
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter one: Introduction1.1 Constr
- Page 16 and 17:
safety. Safety culture contributes
- Page 18 and 19:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEWThe p
- Page 20 and 21:
The construction industry is often
- Page 22 and 23:
Table 1 shows nonfatal occupational
- Page 24 and 25:
centered exclusively on the technic
- Page 26 and 27:
3. Small size of most construction
- Page 28 and 29:
• Quality management: is that asp
- Page 30 and 31:
of project management that is requi
- Page 32 and 33:
organizational programs aiming at m
- Page 34 and 35:
2.2.3 Construction quality in devel
- Page 36 and 37:
5. The designers do not consider th
- Page 38 and 39:
2.3 Construction ProductivityProduc
- Page 40 and 41:
Real Wage TrendsConstruction Traini
- Page 42 and 43:
Rework for correcting unsatisfactor
- Page 44 and 45:
the importance of measurement as
- Page 46 and 47:
productivity sector, because of its
- Page 48 and 49:
2.3.7 Construction productivity in
- Page 50 and 51:
achieved, with the highest quality,
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 2: Methodology Flowchart39
- Page 54 and 55:
Correction for Finite PopulationSS
- Page 56 and 57:
nominal and ordinal scales. Nominal
- Page 58 and 59:
e. If respondent responses disagree
- Page 60 and 61:
Part IV: Linkage between Productivi
- Page 62 and 63:
3.7 Pilot StudyWhenever a researche
- Page 64 and 65:
Group 1# ItemsP-ValuePearsonSignifi
- Page 66 and 67:
Group 1# ItemsP-ValuePearsonSignifi
- Page 68 and 69:
Group 2# Itemstime schedule prepara
- Page 70 and 71:
Group 3# Itemspsychological pressur
- Page 72 and 73:
Group 5# ItemsP-ValuePearsonSignifi
- Page 74 and 75:
Group 7to apply safety regulations4
- Page 76 and 77:
Local conditions 0.485 0.01Worker p
- Page 78 and 79:
Group# of statementsBeforemodificat
- Page 80 and 81:
CostTimeReligionImportanceof StudyR
- Page 82 and 83:
2. The study is limited to the cont
- Page 84 and 85:
This results from the fact that the
- Page 86 and 87:
4.2.4 Capital of CompanyTable 4.2 s
- Page 88 and 89:
Employees' background may vary acco
- Page 90 and 91:
Respondents might have also not bee
- Page 92 and 93:
70.00%60.00%42Percentage of respond
- Page 94 and 95:
4.3 Part II: Company's policy, safe
- Page 96 and 97:
obligatory to provide safety progra
- Page 98 and 99:
Percentage of respondents80.00%60.0
- Page 100 and 101:
Projects that are planned taking in
- Page 102 and 103:
e aware of importance of accident r
- Page 104 and 105:
4.3.1 Part III: Linkage between occ
- Page 106 and 107:
Safety and quality factors# ofRespo
- Page 108 and 109:
Results also show how much importan
- Page 110 and 111:
good safety attitudes in people but
- Page 112 and 113:
y him mostly well understood and ap
- Page 114 and 115:
costs and increased loss-control. T
- Page 116 and 117:
project as of high quality in case
- Page 118 and 119:
group with RII = 0.717 and was rank
- Page 120 and 121:
8. Emergency Preparedness# ofRespon
- Page 122 and 123:
general contractor and subcontracto
- Page 124 and 125:
"Safety committee is formed to moni
- Page 126 and 127:
For a safety program to be properly
- Page 128 and 129:
low factor that affects quality (45
- Page 130 and 131:
"Many change orders during implemen
- Page 132 and 133:
safer. A new worker when oriented w
- Page 134 and 135:
"Inclusion of safety into contract
- Page 136 and 137:
management can be achieved through
- Page 138 and 139:
‘Project Implementation” group
- Page 140 and 141:
4.3.2 Part IV: Linkage between occu
- Page 142 and 143:
GROUP 1: Factors improving producti
- Page 144 and 145:
more unsafely. Productive workers a
- Page 146 and 147: GROUP 3: Local conditionsTable 4.30
- Page 148 and 149: nonworking days rarely occur in Gaz
- Page 150 and 151: warn workers to avoid them. Workers
- Page 152 and 153: ut also when the crew does return t
- Page 154 and 155: from a change in worksite condition
- Page 156 and 157: Comprehensive worker education thro
- Page 158 and 159: directions of safe actions cannot b
- Page 160 and 161: "Safety expenditures are very much
- Page 162 and 163: ecovering their bankruptcy. Under t
- Page 164 and 165: 4.3.4 Part VI: Linkage between occu
- Page 166 and 167: is referred to as heat stress. In a
- Page 168 and 169: job. They can cover work practices,
- Page 170 and 171: "Islam has strengthened principle o
- Page 172 and 173: "Decreasing accidents during work a
- Page 174 and 175: CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMM
- Page 176 and 177: position. This factor belongs to sa
- Page 178 and 179: 5.2.3 Safety and CostThis part of t
- Page 180 and 181: 5.3 RecommendationsRecommendations
- Page 182 and 183: losing contracts because bids that
- Page 184 and 185: Table 5. 6: Mean and standard devia
- Page 186 and 187: degree support that there is a rela
- Page 188 and 189: Relationshipbetween safetyand costR
- Page 190 and 191: Table 5. 12: Mean and standard devi
- Page 192 and 193: Relationship betweenYes 15 2.4623 0
- Page 194 and 195: 5.5 Characteristics of Basic Model
- Page 198 and 199: Arditi, D., and Mochtar, K., 2000,
- Page 200 and 201: Herrero, S., Saldana, M., Del Campo
- Page 202 and 203: Koehn, E., Kothari, R., and Pan, C.
- Page 204 and 205: Salminen, S. and Saari, J., 1995. M
- Page 206 and 207: Annex 1: Questionnaire in English19
- Page 208 and 209: 14. Years of experience in the fiel
- Page 210 and 211: 22. If Yes, indicate periodweekly b
- Page 212 and 213: Study on relationship between safet
- Page 214 and 215: Study on relationship between safet
- Page 216 and 217: PART VI: LINKAGE BETWEEN OCCUPATION
- Page 218 and 219: 5) Safety program for each project6
- Page 220 and 221: بسم االله الرحمن ال
- Page 222 and 223: الجزء الأول:السي
- Page 224 and 225: 12. إذا كان الجواب ن
- Page 226 and 227: أ)دراسة العلاقة
- Page 228 and 229: دراسة العلاقة بين ا
- Page 230 and 231: الجزءالخامس: علاق
- Page 232 and 233: "10.لا يتعارض مب
- Page 234 and 235: Annex 3: Images of safety problems
- Page 236 and 237: Figure 5: Exacavation activities wh
- Page 238 and 239: Figure 8: Worker is fixing house co
- Page 240 and 241: Figure 12: Piping works without saf