Herrero, S., Saldana, M., Del Campo, M., <strong>and</strong> Ritzel, D., 2002, From thetraditional concept of <strong>safety</strong> management to <strong>safety</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated with <strong>quality</strong>,Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 33, No., pp. 1 – 20.H<strong>in</strong>ze, J., 1997, Construction Safety, Prentice Hall, USA.H<strong>in</strong>ze, J., 2003, Improv<strong>in</strong>g Safety Per<strong>for</strong>mance on Large Construction Sites, CIBWork<strong>in</strong>g Commission W99, Brazil.H<strong>in</strong>ze, J., <strong>and</strong> Bren, K., 1996, Identify<strong>in</strong>g OSHA paragraphs of particular <strong>in</strong>terest,Journal of construction Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Management, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 1,pp. 98–100.H<strong>in</strong>zelman, J. A. <strong>and</strong> Smallwood, J., 2003, Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Productivity <strong>and</strong> Lack ofMotivation among Site Managers: Medium Sized Contractors’ Perceptions,CIDB 1st Postgraduate Conference, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.Hoffman, J. M. <strong>and</strong> Mehra, S., 1999, Operationaliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>productivity</strong> improvementprograms through total <strong>quality</strong> management, International Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 72-84.Hogstedt, C., <strong>and</strong> Pieris, B., 2000, Occupational Safety <strong>and</strong> Health <strong>in</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>gCountries, Review of strategies, case studies <strong>and</strong> a bibliography,arbetslivsrapport No. 2000:17.Hoonakker, P., Loush<strong>in</strong>e, T., <strong>and</strong> Carayon, P., 2003, Do <strong>quality</strong> programs help toimprove <strong>safety</strong> <strong>in</strong> construction <strong>in</strong>dustry?, Human Factors <strong>in</strong> OrganizationalDesign <strong>and</strong> Management – VII.Hoonakker, P., Loush<strong>in</strong>e, T., Kallman J., Carayon, P., Kapp, A., <strong>and</strong> Smith, M.,2003, Accidents, Injuries, Worker's Compensation, Safety <strong>and</strong> Safety Policy <strong>in</strong>construction <strong>in</strong>dustry: The Ef<strong>for</strong>t/Results Paradox, Center <strong>for</strong> Quality <strong>and</strong>Productivity Improvements, USA.Howell, G., Ballard, G., <strong>and</strong> Abdelhamid, T., 2002, Work<strong>in</strong>g near the edge: a newapproach to construction <strong>safety</strong>, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs IGLC-10, August, Garamado,Brazil.Huang, X., <strong>and</strong> Fang, D., 2003, Construction Safety Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Education <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Special Issue article <strong>in</strong>: Construction Safety Education <strong>and</strong> Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g - AGlobal Perspective, Ch<strong>in</strong>a.187
Jannadi, M. O., 1995, Impact of Human Relations on the <strong>safety</strong> of constructionworkers, The International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 383 –386.Jannadi, M.O., <strong>and</strong> Assaf, S., 1998. Safety assessment <strong>in</strong> the built environment ofSaudi Arabia, Safety Science, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 15–24.Jannadi, O.A., <strong>and</strong> Bu-Khams<strong>in</strong>, M.S., 2002. Safety factors considered by<strong>in</strong>dustrial contractors <strong>in</strong> Saudi Arabia. Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Environment Vol.. 37, No.5, pp. 539–547.Janssen, J., 2000, The European construction <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>and</strong> its competitiveness: aconstruct of the European Commission, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 711-720Jaselkis, E., <strong>and</strong> Ashley, D., 1999, Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary Study on Contractor Success <strong>in</strong>Develop<strong>in</strong>g Countries, 1 st Conference of CIB TG 29 on Construction <strong>in</strong>Develop<strong>in</strong>g Countries, pp. 27-29, October, The Pan Pacific, S<strong>in</strong>gaporeKaliher, T., 2003, Improve <strong>safety</strong>, health, <strong>and</strong> environmental protection through the<strong>in</strong>troduction of six sigma, Unpublished MSc. Thesis, University of Wiscons<strong>in</strong>-Stout, USAKam<strong>in</strong>g, P. F., Olomolaiye, P. O., Holt, G. D. <strong>and</strong> Harris, F. C., 1997a, Factors<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g craftsmen's <strong>productivity</strong> <strong>in</strong> Indonesia. The International Journal ofProject Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 21 30.Kam<strong>in</strong>g, P. F., Olomolaiye, P. O., Holt, G. D. <strong>and</strong> Harris, F. C., 1997b, Factors<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g time <strong>and</strong> cost overruns on high-rise projects <strong>in</strong> Indonesia.Construction Management <strong>and</strong> Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 83-94Kartam, N.A., 1997, Integrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>safety</strong> <strong>and</strong> health per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>in</strong>to constructionCPM, Journal of Construction Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Management ASCE, Vol. 12No. 2, pp. 121–126.Kartam, N.A., Flood, I., <strong>and</strong> Koushki, P., 2000, Construction <strong>safety</strong> <strong>in</strong> Kuwait:issues, procedures, problems, <strong>and</strong> recommendation, Safety Science, Vol. 36, pp.163–184.Kazaz, A. <strong>and</strong> Ulubeyli, S., 2004, A different approach to construction labor <strong>in</strong>Turkey: comparative <strong>productivity</strong> analysis. Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Environment, Vol. 39,pp. 93 – 100.188
- Page 1:
The Islamic University Of GazaFacul
- Page 4 and 5:
AcknowledgementI would like to than
- Page 6 and 7:
ملخص البحثتعتبر صن
- Page 8 and 9:
Group 3: Study on relationship betw
- Page 10 and 11:
List of TablesTable 1: Nonfatal Occ
- Page 12 and 13:
List of FiguresFigure 1: Costs and
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter one: Introduction1.1 Constr
- Page 16 and 17:
safety. Safety culture contributes
- Page 18 and 19:
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEWThe p
- Page 20 and 21:
The construction industry is often
- Page 22 and 23:
Table 1 shows nonfatal occupational
- Page 24 and 25:
centered exclusively on the technic
- Page 26 and 27:
3. Small size of most construction
- Page 28 and 29:
• Quality management: is that asp
- Page 30 and 31:
of project management that is requi
- Page 32 and 33:
organizational programs aiming at m
- Page 34 and 35:
2.2.3 Construction quality in devel
- Page 36 and 37:
5. The designers do not consider th
- Page 38 and 39:
2.3 Construction ProductivityProduc
- Page 40 and 41:
Real Wage TrendsConstruction Traini
- Page 42 and 43:
Rework for correcting unsatisfactor
- Page 44 and 45:
the importance of measurement as
- Page 46 and 47:
productivity sector, because of its
- Page 48 and 49:
2.3.7 Construction productivity in
- Page 50 and 51:
achieved, with the highest quality,
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 2: Methodology Flowchart39
- Page 54 and 55:
Correction for Finite PopulationSS
- Page 56 and 57:
nominal and ordinal scales. Nominal
- Page 58 and 59:
e. If respondent responses disagree
- Page 60 and 61:
Part IV: Linkage between Productivi
- Page 62 and 63:
3.7 Pilot StudyWhenever a researche
- Page 64 and 65:
Group 1# ItemsP-ValuePearsonSignifi
- Page 66 and 67:
Group 1# ItemsP-ValuePearsonSignifi
- Page 68 and 69:
Group 2# Itemstime schedule prepara
- Page 70 and 71:
Group 3# Itemspsychological pressur
- Page 72 and 73:
Group 5# ItemsP-ValuePearsonSignifi
- Page 74 and 75:
Group 7to apply safety regulations4
- Page 76 and 77:
Local conditions 0.485 0.01Worker p
- Page 78 and 79:
Group# of statementsBeforemodificat
- Page 80 and 81:
CostTimeReligionImportanceof StudyR
- Page 82 and 83:
2. The study is limited to the cont
- Page 84 and 85:
This results from the fact that the
- Page 86 and 87:
4.2.4 Capital of CompanyTable 4.2 s
- Page 88 and 89:
Employees' background may vary acco
- Page 90 and 91:
Respondents might have also not bee
- Page 92 and 93:
70.00%60.00%42Percentage of respond
- Page 94 and 95:
4.3 Part II: Company's policy, safe
- Page 96 and 97:
obligatory to provide safety progra
- Page 98 and 99:
Percentage of respondents80.00%60.0
- Page 100 and 101:
Projects that are planned taking in
- Page 102 and 103:
e aware of importance of accident r
- Page 104 and 105:
4.3.1 Part III: Linkage between occ
- Page 106 and 107:
Safety and quality factors# ofRespo
- Page 108 and 109:
Results also show how much importan
- Page 110 and 111:
good safety attitudes in people but
- Page 112 and 113:
y him mostly well understood and ap
- Page 114 and 115:
costs and increased loss-control. T
- Page 116 and 117:
project as of high quality in case
- Page 118 and 119:
group with RII = 0.717 and was rank
- Page 120 and 121:
8. Emergency Preparedness# ofRespon
- Page 122 and 123:
general contractor and subcontracto
- Page 124 and 125:
"Safety committee is formed to moni
- Page 126 and 127:
For a safety program to be properly
- Page 128 and 129:
low factor that affects quality (45
- Page 130 and 131:
"Many change orders during implemen
- Page 132 and 133:
safer. A new worker when oriented w
- Page 134 and 135:
"Inclusion of safety into contract
- Page 136 and 137:
management can be achieved through
- Page 138 and 139:
‘Project Implementation” group
- Page 140 and 141:
4.3.2 Part IV: Linkage between occu
- Page 142 and 143:
GROUP 1: Factors improving producti
- Page 144 and 145:
more unsafely. Productive workers a
- Page 146 and 147:
GROUP 3: Local conditionsTable 4.30
- Page 148 and 149:
nonworking days rarely occur in Gaz
- Page 150 and 151: warn workers to avoid them. Workers
- Page 152 and 153: ut also when the crew does return t
- Page 154 and 155: from a change in worksite condition
- Page 156 and 157: Comprehensive worker education thro
- Page 158 and 159: directions of safe actions cannot b
- Page 160 and 161: "Safety expenditures are very much
- Page 162 and 163: ecovering their bankruptcy. Under t
- Page 164 and 165: 4.3.4 Part VI: Linkage between occu
- Page 166 and 167: is referred to as heat stress. In a
- Page 168 and 169: job. They can cover work practices,
- Page 170 and 171: "Islam has strengthened principle o
- Page 172 and 173: "Decreasing accidents during work a
- Page 174 and 175: CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMM
- Page 176 and 177: position. This factor belongs to sa
- Page 178 and 179: 5.2.3 Safety and CostThis part of t
- Page 180 and 181: 5.3 RecommendationsRecommendations
- Page 182 and 183: losing contracts because bids that
- Page 184 and 185: Table 5. 6: Mean and standard devia
- Page 186 and 187: degree support that there is a rela
- Page 188 and 189: Relationshipbetween safetyand costR
- Page 190 and 191: Table 5. 12: Mean and standard devi
- Page 192 and 193: Relationship betweenYes 15 2.4623 0
- Page 194 and 195: 5.5 Characteristics of Basic Model
- Page 196 and 197: safety rules, safety inspection, pr
- Page 198 and 199: Arditi, D., and Mochtar, K., 2000,
- Page 202 and 203: Koehn, E., Kothari, R., and Pan, C.
- Page 204 and 205: Salminen, S. and Saari, J., 1995. M
- Page 206 and 207: Annex 1: Questionnaire in English19
- Page 208 and 209: 14. Years of experience in the fiel
- Page 210 and 211: 22. If Yes, indicate periodweekly b
- Page 212 and 213: Study on relationship between safet
- Page 214 and 215: Study on relationship between safet
- Page 216 and 217: PART VI: LINKAGE BETWEEN OCCUPATION
- Page 218 and 219: 5) Safety program for each project6
- Page 220 and 221: بسم االله الرحمن ال
- Page 222 and 223: الجزء الأول:السي
- Page 224 and 225: 12. إذا كان الجواب ن
- Page 226 and 227: أ)دراسة العلاقة
- Page 228 and 229: دراسة العلاقة بين ا
- Page 230 and 231: الجزءالخامس: علاق
- Page 232 and 233: "10.لا يتعارض مب
- Page 234 and 235: Annex 3: Images of safety problems
- Page 236 and 237: Figure 5: Exacavation activities wh
- Page 238 and 239: Figure 8: Worker is fixing house co
- Page 240 and 241: Figure 12: Piping works without saf