13.07.2015 Views

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(f)Protecti<strong>on</strong> of Certain Industrial DesignsTitle V of <strong>the</strong> DMCA adds a new Chapter 13 to <strong>the</strong> copyright statute entitled “Protecti<strong>on</strong>of Original Designs.” Although as currently enacted, Chapter 13 protects <strong>on</strong>ly vessel hulldesigns 1022 with a copyright-like design right, its provisi<strong>on</strong>s are drafted in <strong>the</strong> form of a generalindustrial design protecti<strong>on</strong> statute. Merely by changing a definiti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> statute, C<strong>on</strong>gress canin <strong>the</strong> future easily extend <strong>the</strong> scope of industrial designs that are protected. To obtainprotecti<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> statute requires that <strong>the</strong> owner of <strong>the</strong> design register <strong>the</strong> design with <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g>Office within two years of making <strong>the</strong> design public as embodied in a useful article. Title V of<strong>the</strong> DMCA originally provided that <strong>the</strong> design protecti<strong>on</strong> statute would be effective for an initialtrial period of two years. However, Secti<strong>on</strong> 5005(a)(2) of <strong>the</strong> Intellectual Property andCommunicati<strong>on</strong>s Omnibus Reform Act of 1999 1023 deleted this two-year sunset provisi<strong>on</strong>.(1) Protecti<strong>on</strong> of Designs Embodied in Useful ArticlesSecti<strong>on</strong> 1301(a) of <strong>the</strong> statute provides generally that <strong>the</strong> “designer or o<strong>the</strong>r owner of anoriginal design of a useful article which makes <strong>the</strong> article attractive or distinctive in appearanceto <strong>the</strong> purchasing or using public may secure <strong>the</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong> provided by this chapter up<strong>on</strong>complying with and subject to this chapter.” Secti<strong>on</strong> 1301(b)(2) defines a “useful article” as a“vessel hull or deck, 1024 including a plug or mold, which in normal use has an intrinsic utilitarianfuncti<strong>on</strong> that is not merely to portray <strong>the</strong> appearance of <strong>the</strong> article or to c<strong>on</strong>vey informati<strong>on</strong>. Anarticle which normally is part of a useful article shall be deemed to be a useful article.” It isapparent that, although this definiti<strong>on</strong> is currently limited to vessel hulls and decks, <strong>the</strong> phrase“vessel hull or deck” in <strong>the</strong> definiti<strong>on</strong> could easily be replaced with a generic phrase such as“article,” <strong>the</strong>reby extending protecti<strong>on</strong> to general industrial designs. Alternatively, enumeratedcategories of designs in additi<strong>on</strong> to vessel hulls or decks could easily be added to <strong>the</strong> definiti<strong>on</strong>.(2) OriginalityThe statute establishes a low threshold of originality for protecti<strong>on</strong>. Specifically, Secti<strong>on</strong>1301(b)(1) provides that a design is original “if it is <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong> designer’s creative endeavorthat provides a distinguishable variati<strong>on</strong> over prior work pertaining to similar articles which ismore than merely trivial and has not been copied from ano<strong>the</strong>r source.” Although this is a low1022 Title V overrules B<strong>on</strong>ita Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989), in which <strong>the</strong> SupremeCourt barred states from protecting unpatented boat hulls because such protecti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>flicts with <strong>the</strong> federalpolicy favoring free competiti<strong>on</strong> in inventi<strong>on</strong>s not qualifying for patent protecti<strong>on</strong>.1023 P.L. 106-113 (1999).1024 Secti<strong>on</strong> 1301(b)(3), as amended by Secti<strong>on</strong> 5005(a)(2) of <strong>the</strong> Intellectual Property and Communicati<strong>on</strong>sOmnibus Reform Act of 1999, P.L. 106-113, defines a “vessel” as “a craft--(A) that is designed and capable ofindependently steering a course <strong>on</strong> or through water through its own means of propulsi<strong>on</strong>; and (B) that isdesigned and capable of carrying and transporting <strong>on</strong>e or more passengers.” Under Secti<strong>on</strong> 1301(b)(4), asamended by <strong>the</strong> Vessel Hull Design Protecti<strong>on</strong> Amendments of 2008, P.L. 110-434, a “hull” is “<strong>the</strong> exteriorframe or body of a vessel, exclusive of <strong>the</strong> deck, superstructure, masts, sails, yards, rigging, hardware, fixtures,and o<strong>the</strong>r attachments” and a “deck” is “<strong>the</strong> horiz<strong>on</strong>tal surface of a vessel that covers <strong>the</strong> hull, includingexterior cabin and cockpit surfaces, and exclusive of masts, sails, yards, rigging, hardware, fixtures, and o<strong>the</strong>rattachments.”- 233 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!