13.07.2015 Views

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in <strong>the</strong> case of Article 7, an earlier proposed versi<strong>on</strong> of Article 11 c<strong>on</strong>tained <strong>the</strong> phrase “whe<strong>the</strong>rpermanent or temporary,” but this phrase was deleted in <strong>the</strong> final adopted versi<strong>on</strong>. 55Both Articles 7 and 11 define <strong>the</strong> rights recited <strong>the</strong>rein in terms of “ph<strong>on</strong>ograms.”“Ph<strong>on</strong>ogram” is defined in Article 2(b) as any “fixati<strong>on</strong>” of <strong>the</strong> sounds of a performance or ofo<strong>the</strong>r sounds o<strong>the</strong>r than incorporated in a cinematographic or o<strong>the</strong>r audiovisual work.“Fixati<strong>on</strong>” is defined broadly in Article 2(c) as “<strong>the</strong> embodiment of sounds or <strong>the</strong>representati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>the</strong>reof, from which <strong>the</strong>y can be perceived, reproduced or communicated througha device.” Storage in RAM would seem to satisfy this definiti<strong>on</strong> of fixati<strong>on</strong>. Thus, anyunauthorized transmissi<strong>on</strong> of a performance, or of <strong>the</strong> sounds embodied in a ph<strong>on</strong>ogram fixingsuch performance, to RAM memory would potentially violate <strong>the</strong> rights of both <strong>the</strong> owner of <strong>the</strong>performance and of <strong>the</strong> ph<strong>on</strong>ogram. 565556Article 11(2) in an earlier draft, similar to <strong>the</strong> proposed and later deleted Article 7(2), was also deleted. Article11(2) would have provided: “Subject to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s under, and without prejudice to <strong>the</strong> scope ofapplicability of, Article 19(2), it shall be a matter for legislati<strong>on</strong> in C<strong>on</strong>tracting Parties to limit <strong>the</strong> right ofreproducti<strong>on</strong> in cases where a temporary reproducti<strong>on</strong> has <strong>the</strong> sole purpose of making <strong>the</strong> ph<strong>on</strong>ogram audible orwhere a temporary reproducti<strong>on</strong> is of a transient or incidental nature, provided that such reproducti<strong>on</strong> takesplace in <strong>the</strong> course of use of <strong>the</strong> ph<strong>on</strong>ogram that is authorized by <strong>the</strong> producer of <strong>the</strong> ph<strong>on</strong>ogram or permittedby law in accordance with this Treaty.”The WIPO Performances and Ph<strong>on</strong>ograms Treaty c<strong>on</strong>tains a number of important provisi<strong>on</strong>s relevant to <strong>the</strong><strong>Internet</strong> that are not discussed elsewhere in this paper. Article 4 requires C<strong>on</strong>tracting Parties to afford nati<strong>on</strong>altreatment to nati<strong>on</strong>als of o<strong>the</strong>r C<strong>on</strong>tracting Parties. Article 5(1) affords moral rights to performers:“Independently of a performer’s ec<strong>on</strong>omic rights, and even after <strong>the</strong> transfer of those rights, <strong>the</strong> performershall, as regards his live aural performances or performances fixed in ph<strong>on</strong>ograms, have <strong>the</strong> right to claim to beidentified as <strong>the</strong> performer of his performances, except where omissi<strong>on</strong> is dictated by <strong>the</strong> manner of <strong>the</strong> use of<strong>the</strong> performance, and to object to any distorti<strong>on</strong>, mutilati<strong>on</strong> or o<strong>the</strong>r modificati<strong>on</strong> of his performances thatwould be prejudicial to his reputati<strong>on</strong>.” A proposed Article 5(4), which was deleted in <strong>the</strong> final versi<strong>on</strong>, wouldhave allowed any C<strong>on</strong>tracting Party to declare in a notificati<strong>on</strong> deposited with <strong>the</strong> Director General of WIPOthat it will not apply <strong>the</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>s of Article 5.Article 6 grants performers <strong>the</strong> exclusive right of authorizing <strong>the</strong> broadcasting and communicati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> publicof <strong>the</strong>ir unfixed performances (except where <strong>the</strong> performance is already a broadcast performance) and <strong>the</strong>fixati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong>ir unfixed performances. Articles 9 and 13 grant performers and producers of ph<strong>on</strong>ograms,respectively, <strong>the</strong> exclusive right of authorizing <strong>the</strong> commercial rental to <strong>the</strong> public of <strong>the</strong> original and copies of<strong>the</strong>ir performances fixed in ph<strong>on</strong>ograms and of <strong>the</strong>ir ph<strong>on</strong>ograms.Article 15 provides that “[p]erformers and producers of ph<strong>on</strong>ograms shall enjoy <strong>the</strong> right to a single equitableremunerati<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong> direct or indirect use of ph<strong>on</strong>ograms published for commercial purposes for broadcastingor for any communicati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> public.” The Agreed Statement for Article 15 provides: “It is understood thatArticle 15 does not represent a complete resoluti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> level of rights of broadcasting and communicati<strong>on</strong> to<strong>the</strong> public that should be enjoyed by performers and ph<strong>on</strong>ogram producers in <strong>the</strong> digital age. Delegati<strong>on</strong>s wereunable to achieve c<strong>on</strong>sensus <strong>on</strong> differing proposals for aspects of exclusivity to be provided in certaincircumstances or for rights to be provided without <strong>the</strong> possibility of reservati<strong>on</strong>s, and have <strong>the</strong>refore left <strong>the</strong>issue to future resoluti<strong>on</strong>.”Under Article 17(1), <strong>the</strong> term of protecti<strong>on</strong> to be granted to performers under <strong>the</strong> Treaty is at least 50 yearsfrom <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> year in which <strong>the</strong> performance was fixed in a ph<strong>on</strong>ogram. Under Article 17(2), <strong>the</strong> term ofprotecti<strong>on</strong> to be granted to producers of ph<strong>on</strong>ograms under <strong>the</strong> Treaty is at least 50 years from <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong>year in which <strong>the</strong> ph<strong>on</strong>ogram was published, or failing such publicati<strong>on</strong> within 50 years from fixati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong>ph<strong>on</strong>ogram, 50 years from <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> year in which <strong>the</strong> fixati<strong>on</strong> was made.- 27 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!