13.07.2015 Views

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were brought against MP3.com as well. For example, in Sept. of 2001, Isaac, Taylor & ZacharyHans<strong>on</strong> also sued MP3.com for copying of <strong>the</strong>ir copyrighted s<strong>on</strong>gs <strong>on</strong> My.MP3.com. 128Numerous opini<strong>on</strong>s have been issued as a result of <strong>the</strong>se lawsuits, holding MP3.comliable for willful copyright infringement and ruling it collaterally estopped from denying that itwillfully infringed <strong>the</strong> plaintiffs’ various copyrighted works when it created <strong>the</strong> “server copies”of thousands of CDs in late 1999 and early 2000. 129(i)The CoStar CaseIn CoStar Group Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc., 130 <strong>the</strong> plaintiff CoStar maintained a copyrightedcommercial real estate database that included photographs. The defendant LoopNet offered aservice through which a user, usually a real estate broker, could post a listing of commercial realestate available for lease. The user would access, fill out, and submit a form for <strong>the</strong> propertyavailable. To include a photograph of <strong>the</strong> property, <strong>the</strong> user was required to fill out ano<strong>the</strong>rform. The photograph would initially be uploaded into a separate folder <strong>on</strong> LoopNet’s system,where it would first be reviewed by a LoopNet employee to determine that it was in fact aphotograph of commercial property and that <strong>the</strong>re was no obvious indicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> photograph wassubmitted in violati<strong>on</strong> of LoopNet’s terms and c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. If <strong>the</strong> photograph met LoopNet’scriteria, <strong>the</strong> employee would accept it and post it al<strong>on</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> property listing. CoStar claimedthat over 300 of its copyrighted photographs had been posted <strong>on</strong> LoopNet’s site, and suedLoopNet for both direct and c<strong>on</strong>tributory copyright liability. 131CoStar argued that LoopNet should be directly liable for copyright infringement because,acting through its employees’ review and subsequent posting of <strong>the</strong> photographs, LoopNet wasdirectly copying and distributing <strong>the</strong> photographs, citing <strong>the</strong> Frena case discussed above inSecti<strong>on</strong> II.A.4(d). The district court rejected this argument, noting that <strong>the</strong> Fourth Circuit in <strong>the</strong>ALS Scan case had c<strong>on</strong>cluded that <strong>the</strong> legislative history of <strong>the</strong> DMCA indicated C<strong>on</strong>gress’intent to overrule <strong>the</strong> Frena case and to follow <strong>the</strong> Netcom case, under which an OSP’s liabilityfor postings by its users must be judged under <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tributory infringement doctrine. 132The Fourth Circuit affirmed this ruling <strong>on</strong> appeal. 133 Citing its own decisi<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> ALSScan case, <strong>the</strong> Fourth Circuit noted that it had already held that <strong>the</strong> copyright statute implies arequirement of voliti<strong>on</strong> or causati<strong>on</strong>, as evidenced by specific c<strong>on</strong>duct by <strong>the</strong> purported infringer,128129130131132133Steven B<strong>on</strong>isteel, “Hans<strong>on</strong> Sues Music Locker Service Over <str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g>” (Sept. 26, 2001), available as of Jan. 6,2002 at www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170530.html.See, e.g., Country Road Music, Inc. v. MP3.com, Inc., 279 F.Supp.2d 325 (S.D.N.Y. 2003); Zomba Enters.,Inc. MP3.com, Inc., No. 00 Civ. 6833 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2001); Teevee To<strong>on</strong>s, Inc. v. MP3.com, Inc., 134 F.Supp. 2d 546 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); UMG Recordings, Inc. v. MP3.com, Inc., No. 00 Civ. 472, 200 WL 1262568(S.D.N.Y. 2000).164 F. Supp. 2d 688 (D. Md. 2001).Id. at 691-92.Id. at 695-96.CoStar v. LoopNet, 373 F.3d 544 (4 th Cir. 2004).- 41 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!