ObjectivesThe specific objectives of <strong>this</strong> project are to:1. construct a unique policy relevant information base on PLHIV and their familieswith their participation in all stages of the project;2. promote an understanding of the processes and consequences for PLHIV and howthese impact on their families and communities in which they live;3. identify the unmet need of PLHIV and their immediate families/communities; and4. document the treatment, care and support services (health, welfare, counselling,etc.) PLHIVs and their families are accessing and identify service gaps.Three main activities will be undertaken towards the stated objectives:1. A qualitative study to elicit personal perspectives from PLHIV on the processesand consequences of HIV/<strong>AIDS</strong> on their lives and that of theirfamilies/communities;2. A rapid needs assessment survey of the needs of PLHIV;3. A national dialogue with key stakeholders to disseminate the findings andpromote the formulation of evidence-based policies/programmes with increasedparticipation of PLHIV.The UN Country Team organised an Inception meeting with relevant Government andnon-Government agencies and groups on 10 th March 2006 to inform, and gain inputfrom, service providers, policy-makers and the PLHIV community. The research teamgained critical input on study locations and potential sources of respondents at <strong>this</strong>meeting.MethodologyBoth qualitative (Focus Group Discussion and In-Depth Interview) and quantitativemethods (survey) will be used for the two study components of <strong>this</strong> project. The studyon impact of HIV/<strong>AIDS</strong> will be the qualitative component whilst the needs assessmentwill utilise a quantitative methodology. The quantitative component comprises a surveyusing a structured questionnaire in the appropriate language that is self-administered, orwhere necessary, by face-to-face interview. The studies will be subjected to an ethicalreview committee and informed consent obtained from all participants.With regards to methodology, the basis for undertaking qualitative research for the studyon impact of HIV/<strong>AIDS</strong> are as follows: First, a quantitative survey has the advantage ofa bigger sample size, resources permitting, for drawing inferences to the largerpopulation. However, in the Malaysian case, surveys on PLHIV will have constraints ontheir generalizability because of sampling issues. A random sample of known survivingpersons with HIV could, theoretically, be selected from the existing MOH database ofPLHIV. However, <strong>this</strong> is not possible because of confidentiality as well as availability ofcontact addresses or phone numbers. Secondly, a population-based survey (householdsurvey) is unlikely to capture a random sample of infected persons since HIV status ismost probably unknown for the majority as testing is routine only for certain groups. In20
addition, the stigmatization associated with HIV promotes secrecy, hence many, if notmost, HIV-positive persons will likely not disclose their status for a survey. Thirdly,Malaysia has a concentrated epidemic with relatively low prevalence in the generalpopulation; hence, very large numbers have to be canvassed to capture a randomselection of infected persons. The anticipated problems, and resources required, inselecting a generalizable sample for a survey of PLHIV, and the absence of in-depthbaseline information, suggest a qualitative approach to <strong>this</strong> study on the impact ofHIV/<strong>AIDS</strong>. The advantages of a qualitative enquiry are the following (Ulin et al 2002;Sacket & Weinberg 1997; Dickerson 1997; Allen-Meures & Lane 1990):1. elicits in-depth information from respondents that may uncover unanticipatedcausal factors, and reveal new research questions (exploratory, emergent anditerative processes)2. provides the opportunity for respondents to speak about and discuss issuespertaining to the study with less constraint than a structured questionnaire, i.e.,respondents are active participants rather than subjects3. adds to the content and quality of data collected via a quantitative (survey)approach via a more in-depth understanding of actions and behaviours.Among various qualitative methods, <strong>this</strong> study will utilise focus group discussions(FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) (face-to-face interviews), where preferred. TheFGD will comprise 8 to 10 participants with one trained facilitator whereas the IDIs areconducted individually. Each FGD or IDI will take between one and a half to two hours.Focus groups are a form of group in-depth interview that capitalises on communicationamong research participants in order to generate data (Kitzinger 1995). Focus groupdiscussions or group in-depth interviews are among the most widely used research tool toexamine people’s experiences, and attitudes, with disease and of health services (Murrayet al. 1994; Morgan 1988). A focus group takes advantage of the interaction within asmall group of people as they express their own and respond to other’s views in thegroup. A moderator or group facilitator stimulates and guides the discussion along thespecific research issues or questions. In addition, a focus group discussion may have anote-taker who observes and reports on the proceedings, e.g., levels of interaction,participation and enthusiasm, group dynamics, dominant members, sensitivities, and nonresponse.Defining impactImpact is broadly defined as the constellation of events or situations arising afterdiagnosis and in the process of living with HIV. As mentioned, HIV/<strong>AIDS</strong> has a multidimensionalimpact at the individual, community and country levels. For the individual,the consequences of HIV include illnesses, long-term healthcare costs, income andopportunity losses from sick days, or forced withdrawal, from work/school andconsequent unemployment, transport costs for medical and/or supportive care,psychological or emotional trauma, fear and anxieties, stigmatization andmarginalisation, changes in inter-personal relationships and household structures(Krishna et al 2005; Mehta & Gupta 2005; AVERT 2005).These aspects of consequences affect family members/caregivers as well, and in otherways, notably, fears of contagion, stigmatization, loss of the main breadwinner and/orfamily head, and changes in family dynamics and relationships. There are PLHIV who21
- Page 2 and 3: Table of ContentsPROJECT TEAM 5ACKN
- Page 4 and 5: Information received at the time of
- Page 6 and 7: AcknowledgementsThis research is fu
- Page 9: The main findings from the qualitat
- Page 14 and 15: school or work, transport costs for
- Page 16 and 17: is that the large majority of women
- Page 18 and 19: In fact, special surveys conducted
- Page 22 and 23: have been rejected by their immedia
- Page 24 and 25: eport) that his/her healthcare (or
- Page 26 and 27: CommunityKnowledge/awareness of HIV
- Page 28 and 29: Framework of analysisA descriptive
- Page 30 and 31: urban and a rural community. In all
- Page 32 and 33: medication, the physical health com
- Page 34 and 35: husbands working in other places wh
- Page 36 and 37: (“And then, this doctor, he/she v
- Page 38 and 39: their food. Nurses and their attend
- Page 40 and 41: “Because we take drugs….no time
- Page 42 and 43: The same claim to 100% condom use w
- Page 44 and 45: in asking them to use condoms, even
- Page 46 and 47: “Normally…..normally, memang ma
- Page 48 and 49: (“But I continued using at that t
- Page 50 and 51: “Buat pada permulaannya, saya mem
- Page 52 and 53: However, not all experiences with d
- Page 54 and 55: yang amat sangat. Tak pernah I rasa
- Page 56 and 57: long term fears and anxieties. The
- Page 58 and 59: “The first time I heard from the
- Page 60 and 61: handset, I too, have handset. Some
- Page 62 and 63: have been turning to God since and
- Page 64 and 65: felt I’m indecent. But, at one ti
- Page 66 and 67: would certainly want to continue wo
- Page 68 and 69: (Transgender, 53 yrs, Upper seconda
- Page 70 and 71:
“Sometimes I didn’t get enough
- Page 72 and 73:
positively portray people living wi
- Page 74 and 75:
“After my diagnosis...I’ll pay
- Page 76 and 77:
not know or might not want to be bo
- Page 78 and 79:
(UNAIDS 2005).(UNAIDS 2000):The fac
- Page 80 and 81:
“…bawak saya pergi hospital. An
- Page 82 and 83:
erpindah ke tempat lain makin lama.
- Page 84 and 85:
pada HIV itu, dia nampak penagih. S
- Page 86 and 87:
(Male, 49yrs, University education,
- Page 88 and 89:
However this association with the n
- Page 90 and 91:
“…..depends on who is the perso
- Page 92 and 93:
(“I …my experience society will
- Page 94 and 95:
(“Can…can marry, no problem. Bu
- Page 96 and 97:
Harm Reduction programmeSome urban
- Page 98 and 99:
(“In my opinion such campaign sta
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 2aDistribution of Respondents
- Page 102 and 103:
female sex workers (seven out of 13
- Page 104 and 105:
NO. OF LIVING PARENTSNobody 7 1 1 2
- Page 106 and 107:
tested in drug rehabilitation cente
- Page 108 and 109:
GroupsDUHetero-SexuallyInfectedMenT
- Page 110 and 111:
y the Ministry of Health (74.2%) or
- Page 113 and 114:
Child CareYes, often 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
- Page 115 and 116:
GroupsDUHetero-SexuallyInfectedMenT
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 5: Percentage of Respondents
- Page 119 and 120:
GroupsTable 12aEmotional Problems E
- Page 121 and 122:
Stigmatization and how it has affec
- Page 123 and 124:
GroupsTable 15How They Cope With Th
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 18Percentage Of Respondents W
- Page 127 and 128:
esponsible for their families. As m
- Page 129 and 130:
In this study, it took more effort
- Page 131 and 132:
eing transgender and sex worker whe
- Page 133 and 134:
denies them social and economic opp
- Page 135 and 136:
working towards their future, who c
- Page 137 and 138:
ReferencesAidsmeds.com (2006). Curr
- Page 139 and 140:
Sen G, George A, Ostlin P (2002). E
- Page 141 and 142:
Annex II: FGD Guide for PLHIV Group
- Page 143 and 144:
♦ Spouse: marital/sexual relation
- Page 145 and 146:
I. Attitudes and Perceptions relate
- Page 147 and 148:
I. HIV/AIDS Knowledge‣ What did y
- Page 149 and 150:
Annex V: Rapid Needs Assessment Que
- Page 151 and 152:
Types of support or responsibilityM
- Page 153 and 154:
Please tick (√)one onlyIf yes,ple
- Page 155 and 156:
more help would be useful for you i
- Page 157 and 158:
Annex VI: Ethics Approval Letter157