Americas Defense Meltdown - IT Acquisition Advisory Council

Col. G.I. Wilson & Maj. Donald Vandergriff • 67that technology will eliminate the fog and friction of war. A gradual reduction ofthe officer corps at major and above by 50 percent, while reducing the entire officercorps to 3 to 5 percent of the force, is necessary to eliminate the competitive ethic,bureaucratization and centralization. Reducing the officer corps vastly extends anofficer’s time as a platoon leader, company and battalion commander or primary staffmember, allowing officers to gain more experience in their duties and to take moretime to learn the art of war.The challenge for the Army (and the entire military because everyone falls underDOPMA) is to prioritize which positions are important, and which are unimportant,those unrelated to combat or the structure necessary to support combat units, and togo to Congress and ask them to change the multitude of laws that mandate the useof officers, i.e., requirements for officers to train the National Guard under Title XI,and Joint Duty under the Goldwater-Nichols Act.The Army needs to ask Congress to go back and revise DOPMA, tailoring thelaw to the needs of each service. The Air Force, for example, is more technically andindividually oriented, whereas the Army’s polices should revolve around its emergingunit manning and modular unit system. A unit personnel system would:• Increase the collective training and maintain the “band of excellence” longer,• Ease Operations Tempo (OPTEMPO) or how much units are deployed in relationto their personnel turnover that counters cohesion or unit stabilization,• Reduce personnel costs,• Create a larger pool of readily available units for immediate deployment, and• Diminish the need to pour massive amounts of money into “surge” training inanticipation of or at the start of a conflict.Future warfare of the type envisaged by think tanks and doctrine writers willrarely involve anything like the initial drive of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) toBaghdad, where the Army, the 3rd Infantry Division, received by default the personnelcohesion it needed because its decrepit and incompetent opponent allowed it sixmonths to build up and train up. Future operations will more likely consist of rapiddeployment and entry operations (pre-emptive offensive operations), where successdepends on initial surprise and penetration achieved by the units at the forefrontof the operation, supported by units that come in later to protect their flanks fromcounterattacks. Precision fires and sensors would sweep any future battlefield wherean opponent dares to fight the U.S. Army in the open. 36