05.12.2012 Views

Annual Report 2008-2009 - Department of Transport

Annual Report 2008-2009 - Department of Transport

Annual Report 2008-2009 - Department of Transport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

154<br />

Key Performance Indicators<br />

Key Efficiency<br />

Indicators<br />

Cost per registered vessel<br />

<strong>of</strong> maritime disaster<br />

response<br />

Average survey cost per<br />

commercial vessel<br />

Average cost per private<br />

recreational vessel<br />

registration<br />

2005-06<br />

Actual<br />

2006-07<br />

Actual<br />

2007-08<br />

Actual<br />

<strong>2008</strong> 09<br />

Target<br />

<strong>2008</strong>-09<br />

Actual<br />

$47.18 $51.10 $48.01 $44.04 $35.40<br />

$1,829.25 $1,942.70 $2,124 $2,479 $2,749<br />

$54.02 $52.34 $59.99 $49.82 $79.83<br />

Reasons for Significant Variance<br />

Total costs for this indicator have fallen from $4,425,919<br />

in 2007-08 to $3,346,937 in <strong>2008</strong>-09 together with a 4,426<br />

increase in vessel numbers. Improved cost allocation<br />

methods are the major contributing factor.<br />

Significant additional employment costs were incurred<br />

during the year due to a 4.5% salary increase granted<br />

in February <strong>2008</strong> but not paid until September <strong>2008</strong>,<br />

therefore including more than 6 months back pay in<br />

this fiscal year. The next 5% increase was granted in<br />

February <strong>2009</strong>. Specified Callings salary increases for<br />

the Business Units Marine Surveyors were also granted<br />

during this time.<br />

The steep increase in costs impacting this KPI are<br />

the result <strong>of</strong> a rolling program across all business<br />

units <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> implementing comprehensive<br />

costing/pricing models. The accurate re-assignment<br />

<strong>of</strong> expenses has for this KPI raised costs. Having<br />

established a new benchmark, the next step was to<br />

compare this 08/09 result against 07/08 using the same<br />

costs allocation. However, direct comparisons are not<br />

possible because the new cost allocation method has<br />

not been applied to previous financial years due to the<br />

significant effort/costs involved. The 09/10 results will<br />

become available for comparison and analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!