Annual Report 2008-2009 - Department of Transport
Annual Report 2008-2009 - Department of Transport
Annual Report 2008-2009 - Department of Transport
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
154<br />
Key Performance Indicators<br />
Key Efficiency<br />
Indicators<br />
Cost per registered vessel<br />
<strong>of</strong> maritime disaster<br />
response<br />
Average survey cost per<br />
commercial vessel<br />
Average cost per private<br />
recreational vessel<br />
registration<br />
2005-06<br />
Actual<br />
2006-07<br />
Actual<br />
2007-08<br />
Actual<br />
<strong>2008</strong> 09<br />
Target<br />
<strong>2008</strong>-09<br />
Actual<br />
$47.18 $51.10 $48.01 $44.04 $35.40<br />
$1,829.25 $1,942.70 $2,124 $2,479 $2,749<br />
$54.02 $52.34 $59.99 $49.82 $79.83<br />
Reasons for Significant Variance<br />
Total costs for this indicator have fallen from $4,425,919<br />
in 2007-08 to $3,346,937 in <strong>2008</strong>-09 together with a 4,426<br />
increase in vessel numbers. Improved cost allocation<br />
methods are the major contributing factor.<br />
Significant additional employment costs were incurred<br />
during the year due to a 4.5% salary increase granted<br />
in February <strong>2008</strong> but not paid until September <strong>2008</strong>,<br />
therefore including more than 6 months back pay in<br />
this fiscal year. The next 5% increase was granted in<br />
February <strong>2009</strong>. Specified Callings salary increases for<br />
the Business Units Marine Surveyors were also granted<br />
during this time.<br />
The steep increase in costs impacting this KPI are<br />
the result <strong>of</strong> a rolling program across all business<br />
units <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> implementing comprehensive<br />
costing/pricing models. The accurate re-assignment<br />
<strong>of</strong> expenses has for this KPI raised costs. Having<br />
established a new benchmark, the next step was to<br />
compare this 08/09 result against 07/08 using the same<br />
costs allocation. However, direct comparisons are not<br />
possible because the new cost allocation method has<br />
not been applied to previous financial years due to the<br />
significant effort/costs involved. The 09/10 results will<br />
become available for comparison and analysis.