07.10.2015 Views

heraldryofyorkmi01custuoft

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

He was probably buried in<br />

THE DE MAULEYS. 105<br />

the Minster, for in Torre's account of the<br />

"funeral monuments in the south aisle" (p. 148) he says "On the north<br />

" side, last under the south-west pillar of the lanthorn, lyes an old<br />

" monument, cutt in white stone, with the effigy of a knight in a coat of<br />

" mail, and other compleat armour, a sword by his side, and military bend<br />

" charged with three eagletts, his hands conjoyned at prayer, and his legs<br />

" across, with a lyon dormant at his feet. And on his left side is a large<br />

" shield of his arms, viz. or a bend three eaglets displayed."<br />

There is a paper in the Archizologia (vol. xxxi. p. 238) about this stone,<br />

which seems to have been given by Mr. Thiselton, the then chapter-clerk,<br />

in whose garden<br />

it had been placed after the fire in 1829, to Sir Samuel<br />

Meyrick, who had deposited<br />

it in the chapel<br />

of Goodrich Court.<br />

Stephen de Mauley, the archdeacon, died, according to an entry in<br />

the Archbishop's registry, in 1317. And we may conclude that John, the<br />

remaining one mentioned, was also a brother. Why the archdeacon should<br />

hold up what seems to be John's shield, charged with three eagles, I cannot<br />

say possibly the shields may have been changed before Torre's time, and<br />

;<br />

the shield with the red bend (the tincture changed for difference) has been<br />

placed in the hands of another figure. I cannot discern any trace of that<br />

shield having been moved, and it seems to harmonize with the dress of<br />

the figure which holds it. But the figure next to the archdeacon, holding<br />

the shield, vaire a maunche gules, I fancy to be the figure of Peter, fourth<br />

baron, as this, as I will<br />

of the family.<br />

shew by and by, would be the principal quartering<br />

According to Torre, three shields, since destroyed,<br />

were in the window<br />

beneath ;<br />

i.e. in the north-eastern light, now occupied by the shield of<br />

Fenton (azure, six hawks' heads or), the arms of Malbis, argent, a chevron<br />

between three hinds' heads gules ;<br />

in the centre light, or, a fesse gules,<br />

three torteaux in chief; and in the western light, or a fesse dancette sable,<br />

Vavasour. I venture to think that Torre was mistaken as to the two<br />

former, in consequence of the similarity of the coats, and that they should<br />

have been described as (i) argent, a chevron between three fowls' heads,<br />

Furnival, which difference in the ordinary coat seems to be still carried by<br />

one branch of the family, viz., Furnival of Blagsdon (Burke) ; (2) or, two<br />

bars gules, in chief two torteaux, Wake.<br />

This would make their significance quite clear, viz., the alliances<br />

formed by the only two of this generation who married. Wake being<br />

the shield of Baldwin, Lord de Wake, whose daughter, we are told in the<br />

Hotham pedigree, married John de Mauley, who inherited the lands, and<br />

therefore acquired the name of Hotham. Furnival being the coat of<br />

Eleanor, daughter of Thomas, Lord Furnival, who married Peter, fourth<br />

Baron de Mauley and Vavasour that of Walter de Vavasour, who married<br />

;<br />

her sister, Alyne or Alianora.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!