07.10.2015 Views

heraldryofyorkmi01custuoft

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION. 7 1<br />

The attendant armour-bearers and esquires, being dressed in fantastic<br />

habits, guarded their masters' escutcheons, and reported the name and<br />

quality of the challenger, whose defiance was signified by the act of touching<br />

the shield with the point of a spear. Others* have attributed them<br />

of arms, which<br />

entirely to seal engravers, who on cutting, on seals, shields<br />

were in a triangular form, and placed on a circle, finding a vacant space at<br />

each side and at the top, thought<br />

it an ornament to fill them up with<br />

olive-branches, garbs, trees, fretwork, lions, unicorns, or some other animals,<br />

according to fancy. These surmises are probably both true the former<br />

being the development of the latter indeed, we can trace its gradual<br />

:<br />

growth in the royal seals, as given in Sandford's Genealogical History. On<br />

the seal of Edmund, Earl of Cornwall, his shield is represented as held up<br />

by a strap passing through the beak of an eagle. On the seal of Thomas,<br />

Duke of Lancaster, the eldest son of Crouchback, the shield is hung by a<br />

strap to a hook ; but on each side is a small dragon, the same as on the<br />

crest of his helmet. On the great seal of Edward III., eight lions are<br />

represented on each side of the King,<br />

and two under his feet. On the<br />

great seal of Richard II., shields bearing the arms of England are represented<br />

on either side of him, hanging on trees, with a greyhound beneath<br />

them, while a lion sejeant supports the effigy of the King on either side.<br />

In his reign, Dallaway says, the ample field of heraldic invention was<br />

expanded, crests and cognizances were multiplied, and supporters generally<br />

introduced. Richard effeminate and luxurious indulged himself in the<br />

fopperies of dress, and armorial devices were no longer confined to warriors<br />

completely armed, but embossed and embroidered on the habits, mantles,<br />

and surcoats of those who attended his sumptuous Court and<br />

;<br />

we can well<br />

imagine that, not content with bearing his<br />

cognizances, they were actually<br />

arrayed so as to personify the figures or animals which he had already<br />

associated with his arms. The fashion would soon spread, and the shield<br />

be deemed incomplete without them. Indeed, the stone shields in York<br />

Minster furnish illustrations of this. In the Nave, built 1291-1345, i.e.<br />

during the reigns of Edward I., II. and III., the shields are represented<br />

as hanging from hooks. In the Choir, built 1373-1400, i.e. during the<br />

reign of Richard II., they hang from the necks of figures, i.e. supporters.<br />

But there seems to have been no written precedent for the ordering,<br />

bearing, or limiting of supporters. Custom and practice have reduced the<br />

use of bearing supporters to " the major nobility," and no one of inferior<br />

degree is entitled to assume them without a special grant from the Heralds'<br />

College, which is rarely given but there are certain families whose ancestors<br />

;<br />

have used supporters from very ancient times, and who therefore continue<br />

to do so, viz. :<br />

* Edmonson's Heraldry.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!