07.10.2015 Views

heraldryofyorkmi01custuoft

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

132 THE HERALDRY OF YORK MINSTER.<br />

At a sign from Gloucester, bands of soldiers rushed in from the corridor.<br />

Hastings was seized, hurried away, and instantly beheaded on a timber log<br />

which lay in the court of the Tower.<br />

What wonder, then, if in those days of eloquent heraldic significance,<br />

the family changed the red sleeve to the black the token of royal favour<br />

to the commemoration of royal displeasure, when the latter had become<br />

the token of unswerving fidelity and courage,<br />

and of a determination to<br />

defend the rights of fatherless children, even at the sacrifice of life. When<br />

next you go up the Nave, look up to the black sleeve, and then ask God<br />

to give you grace, at all hazards, to do what is right also.<br />

But there were other members of the same race, who were as staunch<br />

to what they deemed right, and one especially, whose name may be fittingly<br />

commemorated in a disquisition on Heraldry.<br />

There were, and indeed there are, two distinct families of Hastings,<br />

viz., Hastings, Baron Hastings, Earls of Pembroke ; and Hastings, Baron<br />

Hastings, Earls of Huntingdon both descended from one common ancestor,<br />

Robert de Hastings, who was portgrave of that place, and steward to William<br />

the Conqueror. His son, Walter, was steward to Henry I., and had a grant<br />

of the manor of Ashill, Norfolk, for taking care of the naperie (table-linen)<br />

at the Coronation.<br />

On the death of John, sixth Lord Hastings<br />

and third Earl of<br />

Pembroke, 1389 (who was killed in a tournament, while yet a lad of sixteen,<br />

by Sir John St. John, who by an unlucky slip of his lance mortally wounded<br />

him in the abdomen), a controversy arose as to the right to bear the arms<br />

of Hastings, without a mark of difference or abatement, between Reginald,<br />

Lord Grey de Ruthyn, and Sir Edward Hastings.<br />

They were descended from the second Baron Hastings, who died in<br />

1313, and was great-great-grandfather of the unfortunate young man.<br />

Lord Grey de Ruthyn claimed the privilege<br />

because his grandfather,<br />

Roger, Lord Grey, had married Elizabeth, the daughter of Lord Hastings<br />

by his first wife, Isabel de Valence.<br />

Sir Edward Hastings, because he was descended from the eldest son<br />

of the said Lord Hastings by his second wife, Margery de Foliot. Each<br />

assumed the title of Lord Hastings. The cause was tried before the House<br />

of Lords, and referred by them to the judges. On their report, the Lords<br />

decided in favour of Lord Grey de Ruthyn.<br />

But Sir Edward Hastings appealed against this decision ; and, on<br />

the accession of Henry V., several commissions were issued for hearing it.<br />

The proceedings were protracted for some years; and in 1421, before<br />

any judgment had been given, Sir Edward Hastings was arrested by Lord<br />

Grey for the sum of ^987, the cost of the original suit, and was thrown<br />

into the Marshalsea.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!