07.10.2015 Views

heraldryofyorkmi01custuoft

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION. 73<br />

each side of the arch seems to be standing on a dragon. On the<br />

panels under the recumbent figure beneath, the Archbishop's arms are<br />

emblazoned on four shields. No. i, the pale alone, for Savage,<br />

i.e. the individual<br />

; 2, the pale impaled with the saltire cross of Rochester,<br />

i.e. his first<br />

bishopric ; 3, impaled with the keys in saltire and crown, for the diocese of<br />

York ; 4, impaled with the pall, for the province of York. And this furnishes<br />

a subject alike of historical and heraldic interest, for the coat is not the<br />

family coat of Savage, which as I have already shewn is<br />

argent six lioncels<br />

sable; it is the coat of Danvers, or De Anvers, after Edward II. written<br />

Daniell.*<br />

It would appear that John Savage, the great-great-grandfather of the<br />

Archbishop, who died in 1386, married Margaret, daughter and heiress of<br />

Sir Thomas Danvers, of Bradley and Clifton in Cheshire. She was married<br />

three times. First to John Radcliffe ;<br />

secondly, to John Savage ; and, after<br />

his death, to Piers Legh, of Maxfield, younger son of Robert Legh, of<br />

Adlington. By her second husband she had one son, John Savage, and<br />

by her last husband a son, Piers Legh. She survived them all ; but when<br />

she died, in 1427, she specially directed in her will that her son, John<br />

Savage, should bear her coat-of-arms, which she inherited from her father.<br />

And this was according to the custom of those days ; for not only<br />

did the nobility claim the privilege of granting arms to their esquires,<br />

which were afterwards confirmed by the Earl Marshal, but arms appear<br />

likewise to have been conceded by one knight to another and<br />

; they might<br />

be assigned by a female, who was an heir general, to her own husband,<br />

or the husband of her daughter, who inherited her lands, and therefore<br />

certainly to her son, who even without that stipulation would have been<br />

entitled to quarter<br />

for what she did,<br />

them. And I think that we can understand the reason<br />

for her husband, John Savage, was simply a member of<br />

that family, then located at Sarcliffe in Derbyshire. But her father,<br />

Sir Thomas Danvers, was a distinguished warrior. He was one of the<br />

flower of Cheshire chivalry who were engaged under their Earl, the Black<br />

Prince, when only sixteen years of age, at the battle of Crescy.<br />

Stowe, in his terse account of this bloody battle, which lasted two<br />

days, says that at the commencement " the French King caused his banner,<br />

" called<br />

'<br />

auriflaime,' to be set up, after which time it was not lawfull, under<br />

"paine of death, to take any man to save his life. This banner, that it<br />

" might differ from his standert, had in it Lilies of gold very broad. On<br />

" the other side, King Edward commanded his banner to be erected of<br />

" the Dragon, which signified fiercenesse and cruelty to be turned against<br />

"the Lillies."<br />

So that no quarter was given on either side. The principal division<br />

of the English army, some 10,800, was entrusted to the young Prince, who<br />

* Ormerod's History of Cheshire.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!