Chromosome segregation errors: a double-edged sword - TI Pharma
Chromosome segregation errors: a double-edged sword - TI Pharma
Chromosome segregation errors: a double-edged sword - TI Pharma
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6<br />
these cells with E1A virus 584 . Strikingly, the transformed BJ-Tert cell line that had undergone all<br />
three events was more sensitive to Mps1 inhibition (Fig.5C). While wild-type BJ-Tert cells did not<br />
show any decrease in colony formation capacity following treatment with 30nM compound-5, the<br />
viability of fully transformed BJ-Tert cells (p53KD, HRASV12 and E1A) was clearly affected (Fig.5C).<br />
These data indeed indicate that transformed cells are much more affected by partial Mps1 inhibition<br />
compared to healthy diploid cells. These differences are most likely due to more severe effects of partial<br />
Mps1 inhibition on mitotic timing and chromosome congression in tumor cells, which eventually lead<br />
to chromosome <strong>segregation</strong> <strong>errors</strong>, DNA damage and cell death.<br />
High doses of compound 5 lead to deleterious effects on intestinal structures in mice.<br />
Since these and published data suggest that Mps1 inhibition is a possible interesting candidate in<br />
specific anti-cancer treatment 176,299,578,585 we plan to test the effect of Mps1 inhibition in a mouse<br />
model for spontaneous tumor formation 586 . We tested the bio-availability in Balb/c mice and the<br />
maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of compound-5 in wild-type FVB female mice (Fig.6). <strong>Pharma</strong>cokinetic<br />
studies of intravenous and orally delivered compound-5 revealed a long latency time of the inhibitor<br />
in the blood of more than 24 hours with a half-time of ~6 hours (Fig.6A). Initial MTD studies (50, 100<br />
and 150 mg kg -1 compound-5) resulted in lethality in a very short time-span (~4-5 days). Haematoxylin<br />
and Eosin (H&E) staining of the intestines of compound-5 treated mice revealed deleterious effects of<br />
the inhibitor on the intestinal structure, as is evident by small villae and unstructured crypts (Fig.6B).<br />
Moreover, actively dividing cells were almost completely absent in the intestinal crypts of mice treated<br />
with compound-5 as determined with staining for phosphoS10-Histone H3, a mitotic marker, and Ki67,<br />
a proliferation marker (Fig.6B). These effects on the intestine indicate that the cell cycle progression<br />
of crypt cells in vivo has been affected. In future studies we wish to find well tolerated doses of<br />
compound-5 and test the activity in mouse models for spontaneous tumor formation.<br />
Discussion<br />
In this study, we have validated Mps1 as a promising anti-cancer target using a small<br />
molecule inhibitor. The inhibitor, referred to as compound-5, binds with subnanomolar<br />
affinity to Mps1 and is more than 60-fold selective over a panel of 281 other kinases. Its<br />
selectivity entropy, which is a novel quantitative measure of quantifying selectivity from panel<br />
screening data 580 , is 0.13 and this low value signifies it is an excellently selective inhibitor.<br />
In fact there are only three kinase targets on which more selective reference inhibitors were<br />
reported so far 587 . Furthermore, the compound has a long retention time on Mps1 (~46 h) (data<br />
not shown). The specificity and long latency could make compound-5 useful for in vivo tumor<br />
studies, since one single administration could inhibit Mps1 molecules for a prolonged period<br />
of time, which could decrease the need for multiple rounds of compound-5 administration.<br />
Nanomolar concentrations of compound-5 specifically reduced the mitotic timing and affected<br />
chromosome alignment of tumor cells, whereas immortalized, diploid fibroblasts were less affected<br />
(Fig. 5). This suggests that healthy cells can cope with slight defects in Mps1 activity in contrast to tumor<br />
cells, which die at relatively low doses of Mps1 inhibitor (Fig.4A). One explanation for this difference<br />
could be that healthy, untransformed cells need less time to align their diploid content of chromosomes<br />
and might therefore be less affected by checkpoint inhibition induced by partial Mps1 inhibition when<br />
compared to tumor cells that have to cope with the presence of extra chromosomes. This hypothesis is<br />
124