07.12.2012 Views

Chromosome segregation errors: a double-edged sword - TI Pharma

Chromosome segregation errors: a double-edged sword - TI Pharma

Chromosome segregation errors: a double-edged sword - TI Pharma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

Aneuploidy is a common genetic alteration in solid human cancers and refers to an abnormal<br />

chromosome number 236 . The main underlying phenotype that causes aneuploidy is known as<br />

chromosomal instability (CIN), which is the frequent gain and loss of whole chromosomes during<br />

cell division 270,289 . The widespread occurrence of aneuploidy in cancers has led to the hypothesis<br />

that CIN may contribute to tumor formation and/or progression 287 . In support of this, CIN occurs at<br />

an early stage of colorectal tumorigenesis and has been shown to occur in cell cultures of colon,<br />

prostate, oropharynx, lung and breast tumors 289,312,437-439 . Moreover, a strong correlation of CIN<br />

with aggressiveness of the tumor, resistance to chemotherapeutics and poor patient prognosis has<br />

been reported 271-273,275-280,283 , and a striking correlation was observed between a CIN signature and<br />

different grades of primary breast cancers and derivative lung metastases 275 . Such observations have<br />

spurred extensive investigations into the potential role of CIN in tumor formation and progression,<br />

and several mouse models have resulted in important advances in our understanding of this 398 .<br />

Errors in mitotic chromosome <strong>segregation</strong> are the predominant cause of CIN. Such <strong>errors</strong> are<br />

normally prevented by the error-correction and mitotic checkpoint machineries. The mitotic<br />

or spindle assembly checkpoint is a safeguarding mechanism that delays mitotic exit until<br />

error-correction has ensured that all chromosomes are attached and aligned correctly on the<br />

mitotic spindle 440 . The mitotic checkpoint is a robust signalling cascade that originates from the<br />

chromosomal anchor points of mitotic spindle microtubules, termed kinetochores, whenever<br />

these kinetochores are not interacting with microtubules 441 . The core conserved components of<br />

the mitotic checkpoint are Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, BubR1, Bub1, and Mps1. Depletion or inactivation<br />

of any one of these components abrogates mitotic checkpoint activity, resulting in chromosome<br />

mis<strong>segregation</strong>s and thus aneuploidy 441 . On top of their role in the mitotic checkpoint, Mps1,<br />

BubR1 and Bub1 have also been shown to be important players in error-correction 116,442,443 .<br />

Although yet to be shown for human cancers, defects in both error correction and mitotic checkpoint<br />

functioning have been hypothesized to cause CIN in tumor cells and experimental weakening of either<br />

has supported this 290 . Additional defects that have been hypothesized to contribute to CIN are sister<br />

chromatid cohesion defects, cytokinesis defects and centrosome overduplication 335,338,353,355,356,444 .<br />

Various mouse models for chromosomal instability have been generated 392 . These mouse models mainly<br />

target proteins which have a role in mitotic progression, such as CENP-E, UbcH10 and Cdc20 and the<br />

mitotic checkpoint proteins Mad2, Mad1, Bub1, Bub3, BubR1, 332,392,400,413 . Homozygous deletion of all<br />

studied mitotic checkpoint components causes early embryonic lethality 392 . The effects of heterozygous<br />

deletion, however, depend on the gene and tissue examined. For instance, Mad2 +/- and Mad1 +/- mice<br />

develop tumors at long latency 291,298 , while on the other hand, heterozygous deletion of Bub1, Bub3<br />

or BubR1 did not lead to spontaneous tumor formation, despite development of aneuploidy 295-297,300 .<br />

However, treating some of these models with carcinogens or crossing them with tumor prone mouse<br />

models did increase the extent and speed of tumor formation 286,295,296,401 . In contrast to heterozygous<br />

deletion, reducing levels of Bub1 using hypomorphic mice resulted in spontaneous tumorigenesis 395 ,<br />

indicating that different levels of CIN may have different outcomes, depending on the genetic context.<br />

In contrast to the tumor promoting roles of CIN, excessive CIN and aneuploidy are not tolerated at<br />

the cellular level 292,445,446 . Indeed, CIN may also confer a tumor suppressive function in certain mouse<br />

models 286,397 and more importantly, in human patients 404 . In line with this, enhancing chromosome<br />

<strong>segregation</strong> <strong>errors</strong> through mitotic checkpoint inhibition has been suggested as a useful anti-cancer<br />

strategy 292,299,447 .<br />

The abovementioned studies suggest that the contribution of CIN to tumor formation or progression<br />

55<br />

Cre-inducible Mps1 knock-in mouse model (CiMKi)<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!