21.07.2016 Views

Vitamin D and Health

SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report

SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. Introduction<br />

Background<br />

1.1 <strong>Vitamin</strong> D is synthesised in the skin by the action of sunlight containing ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation.<br />

Skin synthesis is the main source of vitamin D for most people. Dietary sources are essential when<br />

exposure to sunlight containing the appropriate wavelength is limited.<br />

1.2 The Committee on Medical Aspects of Food <strong>and</strong> Nutrition Policy (COMA) set Dietary Reference Values<br />

(DRVs) for vitamin D in 1991 (DH, 1991). COMA did not set a Reference Nutrient Intake (RNI 7 ) for<br />

groups in the population considered to receive adequate sunlight exposure because it was assumed<br />

that, for most people, the amount of vitamin D produced by exposure to UVB radiation in the summer<br />

would provide enough for their needs during winter.<br />

1.3 Current UK Government advice is that a dietary intake of vitamin D is not necessary for individuals<br />

living a ‘normal lifestyle’. Only certain groups of the population, who are at risk of vitamin D<br />

deficiency, are advised to take a daily supplement: pregnant <strong>and</strong> breastfeeding women (10 µg/400 IU),<br />

infants <strong>and</strong> children aged under 4y (7-8.5 µg/17.5-21 IU); adults aged 65y or above (10 µg/400 IU);<br />

those with limited exposure to the sun (e.g., if they cover their skin for cultural reasons or are<br />

housebound) (10 µg/400 IU) <strong>and</strong> women <strong>and</strong> children of Asian origin (10 µg/400 IU). The DRVs for<br />

vitamin D were reviewed <strong>and</strong> endorsed by COMA in 1998 (DH, 1998).<br />

1.4 Although the current recommendations for vitamin D are based on bone health, it has been suggested<br />

that vitamin D may have a role in other health outcomes, which include reducing the risk of cancers,<br />

cardiovascular disease (CVD), infectious diseases <strong>and</strong> autoimmune diseases.<br />

1.5 The evidence on vitamin D <strong>and</strong> health was previously considered by the Scientific Advisory Committee<br />

on Nutrition (SACN) in 2007 (SACN, 2007). In its position statement ‘Update on <strong>Vitamin</strong> D’ SACN<br />

concluded that there was insufficient evidence, at that time, to reconsider the existing COMA DRVs for<br />

vitamin D <strong>and</strong> that the evidence on the relationship between vitamin D status <strong>and</strong> chronic disease,<br />

other than the metabolic bone diseases rickets <strong>and</strong> osteomalacia, was insufficient to draw<br />

conclusions.<br />

1.6 In October 2010, SACN agreed to review the data on vitamin D because a significant amount of new<br />

evidence had accumulated since its previous considerations, including: results from research<br />

commissioned by the Food St<strong>and</strong>ards Agency (FSA); a detailed report published by the Institute of<br />

Medicine (IOM) in the United States (US) on Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium <strong>and</strong> <strong>Vitamin</strong> D<br />

(IOM, 2011) 8 ; <strong>and</strong> numerous studies on vitamin D <strong>and</strong> various health outcomes.<br />

Terms of Reference<br />

1.7 The SACN Working Group on <strong>Vitamin</strong> D (WG) was established in 2011 to consider whether the current<br />

DRVs for vitamin D intake, set by COMA in 1991, were still appropriate to ensure vitamin D adequacy<br />

of the UK population in the context of current lifestyles <strong>and</strong> public health advice (e.g., to stay out of<br />

the sun <strong>and</strong> to wear sunscreen).<br />

7 The amount of a nutrient that is sufficient to meet the needs of 97.5% of the population.<br />

8 Draft report published in 2010.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!