21.07.2016 Views

Vitamin D and Health

SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report

SACN_Vitamin_D_and_Health_report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 26: RCTs (not included in above meta-analyses) on effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength <strong>and</strong> function in adults ≥ 50y<br />

Study/<br />

Country<br />

Study population<br />

Intervention/study<br />

design<br />

Mean baseline<br />

25(OH)D (nmol/L)<br />

Post intervention<br />

25(OH)D (nmol/L)<br />

Outcome Results Comments<br />

Lips et al<br />

(2010)<br />

North<br />

America &<br />

Europe<br />

Men & women<br />

(n=226) with serum<br />

25(OH)D ≤50 <strong>and</strong> <br />

15 nmol/l<br />

Mean age: 78y<br />

1. 210 µg/wk D3<br />

2. Placebo<br />

Duration: 16 weeks<br />

Double-blind<br />

1. 34.2 ± 11.0<br />

2. 35.2 ± 13.7<br />

1. 65.4<br />

2. Unchanged.<br />

Mean difference<br />

between groups of<br />

32.4.<br />

Primary - mediolateral<br />

body sway<br />

Secondary - short<br />

physical performance<br />

battery (SPPB)<br />

Mediolateral sway – no change<br />

from baseline in either group. No<br />

significant treatment differences<br />

on basis of baseline 25(OH)D<br />

concentration (≤ 37 or > 37<br />

nmol/L)<br />

SPPB – no significant difference in<br />

change in SPPB scores between<br />

intervention <strong>and</strong> placebo group<br />

In the post hoc<br />

subgroup analysis,<br />

mediolateral sway<br />

was reduced in<br />

vitamin D<br />

supplemented<br />

patients with<br />

elevated sway at<br />

baseline (≥ 0.46 cm)<br />

(p=0.047).<br />

Pirotta et<br />

al (2014)<br />

Australia<br />

Men <strong>and</strong> women<br />

(n=26) with serum<br />

25(OH)D<br />

concentration 25-60<br />

nmol/L<br />

Mean age:<br />

Women – 66.1±4.0 y<br />

Men – 71.5±5.7 y<br />

1. 50µg/d D3<br />

2. Placebo<br />

Duration: 10 weeks<br />

Double blind<br />

1. 46.4 ± 11.4<br />

2. 48.5 ± 11.1<br />

1. 81<br />

2. No change<br />

Primary – corticospinal<br />

excitability, intracortical<br />

inhibition<br />

Secondary – muscle<br />

strength (knee<br />

extension) & muscle<br />

power (stair climbing,<br />

four square step test,<br />

timed-up-<strong>and</strong>-go test)<br />

Significant 8-11% increase in<br />

muscle strength in vitamin D<br />

group (p < 0.05) but changes not<br />

significantly different from the<br />

placebo group.<br />

No effect of vitamin D on muscle<br />

power.<br />

Very small study.<br />

Knutsen et<br />

al (2014)<br />

Norway<br />

Adults (n=251) living<br />

in Oslo but born (or<br />

parents born) in<br />

Middle East, Africa,<br />

South Asia<br />

Age: 18-50 years<br />

1. 10 µg/d D3<br />

2. 25 µg/d D3<br />

3. Placebo<br />

Duration: 16 weeks<br />

Double-blind.<br />

1. 27 (15)<br />

2. 27 (16)<br />

3. 27 (15)<br />

1. 43 (17)<br />

2. 52 (20)<br />

3. 25 (12)<br />

Primary - Jump height<br />

Secondary - chair rising<br />

test, h<strong>and</strong>grip strength.<br />

Mean difference (95% CI)<br />

compared with placebo<br />

Jump height<br />

1. -2.4 (-7.2, 2.4); p=0.24<br />

2. -0.4 (-5.1, 4.4); p=0.85<br />

H<strong>and</strong>grip strength<br />

1. -2.57 (-7.00, 1.86); p=0.25<br />

2. 0.21 (-4.42, 4.85); p=0.93<br />

Chair test<br />

1. -0.53 (-4.09, 3.04); p=0.77<br />

2. 0.02 (-3.97, 4.00); p=0.99<br />

There was no<br />

significant<br />

improvement in tests<br />

of muscle strength in<br />

vitamin D<br />

supplemented<br />

groups compared to<br />

placebo group.<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!