10.12.2012 Views

Handbook of Electrical Installation Practice - BeKnowledge

Handbook of Electrical Installation Practice - BeKnowledge

Handbook of Electrical Installation Practice - BeKnowledge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BS 6651 provides a simple mathematical overall risk factor analysis for assessing<br />

whether a structure needs protection. It suggests that an acceptable lightning strike<br />

risk factor is 10 -5 per year, i.e. 1 in 100000 per year. Therefore, having applied the<br />

mathematical analysis to a particular set <strong>of</strong> parameters, the scheme designer will<br />

achieve a numerical solution. If the risk factor is less than 10 -5 (1 in 100000), for<br />

example 10 -6 (1 in 1000000), then in the absence <strong>of</strong> other overriding considerations,<br />

protection is deemed unnecessary. If, however, the risk factor is greater than 10 -5 ,<br />

for example 10 -4 , then protection would seem necessary.<br />

A suitable analogy could be made with the odds in horse racing. The shorter the<br />

odds (e.g. 5:1), the more likely it is that the horse will win the race. The longer the<br />

odds (e.g. 100:1), the less likely it is that the horse will win.<br />

The shorter the risk factor (e.g. 1 in 10000) the greater the risk that a structure<br />

will be hit by lightning. The longer the risk factor (e.g. 1 in 1000000) the less likely<br />

it is that the structure will be hit by lightning.<br />

It is acknowledged that certain factors cannot be assessed in this way and these<br />

may override all other considerations. For example, if there is a requirement that<br />

there should be no avoidable risk to life or a requirement for occupants <strong>of</strong> a building<br />

always to feel safe, then this will favour the installation <strong>of</strong> protection, even<br />

though it would normally be accepted that protection is unnecessary.<br />

The factors which should be considered for determining an overall risk factor can<br />

be summarised as follows.<br />

The geographical location <strong>of</strong> the structure<br />

This pinpoints the average lightning flash density or the number <strong>of</strong> flashes to ground<br />

per km 2 per year. For structures sited within the UK this figure can be taken from<br />

the map in Fig. 9.4.<br />

The effective collection area <strong>of</strong> the structure<br />

This is the plan area, projected in all directions taking account <strong>of</strong> the structure’s<br />

height. The significance is that the larger the structure, the more likely it is to be<br />

struck (Fig. 9.5).<br />

For a simple rectangular box shaped structure as illustrated in Fig. 9.5, the collection<br />

area (symbol A c) is simply the product <strong>of</strong>:<br />

2<br />

Ac = LW+ 2LH+ 2WH+ pH<br />

where: L = length<br />

W = width<br />

H = height.<br />

The probable number <strong>of</strong> strikes to the structure per year (P) is the product <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flash density and the collection area, thus<br />

-<br />

P = Ac ¥ Ng<br />

¥ 10 6<br />

Lightning Protection 201<br />

where N g = the number <strong>of</strong> flashes to ground per km 2 per year. (The number 10 -6 is<br />

included because Ac is in m 2 whereas Ng is per km 2 .)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!