12.12.2012 Views

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.6. Nucleon Elastic Form Factors 159<br />

n<br />

G<br />

M<br />

µ n G D<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0 4 8<br />

Q<br />

12<br />

2 [(GeV/c) 2 ]<br />

n<br />

G<br />

E<br />

0.1<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

0<br />

0 0.5 1 1.5<br />

Q 2 [(GeV/c) 2 ]<br />

Figure 6.14: Magnetic (left) and electric (right) form factors for the neutron. Here we show<br />

the magnetic form factor divided by the dipole formula. The magnetic form factor shows rough<br />

agreement with the dipole formula for |q| 2 < 5(GeV/c) 2 . [See C.Hyde-Wright and K. de Jager,<br />

Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54, 217 (2004).]<br />

represents the charge (magnetic) distribution. The contributions of charge<br />

and magnetism are mixed in both GE and GM .<br />

5. The distribution of electric and magnetic charges within the proton are significantly<br />

different. Since GE falls faster with q 2 than GM theelectriccharge<br />

is spread out more than the magnetic one.<br />

6. If a certain property, for instance the charge, is described by a form factor G,<br />

with G(0) = 1, then Eq. (6.20) shows that the mean-square radius for this<br />

property can be found from the slope of G(q2 )attheorigin:<br />

〈r 2 〉 = −6� 2<br />

� 2 dG(q )<br />

dq2 �<br />

q2 . (6.45)<br />

=0<br />

From the dipole fit, Eq. (6.42), one obtains 〈r 2 E (proton)〉 ≈0.7 fm2 . However,<br />

a more accurate estimation (38) yields 〈r 2 E (proton)〉 ≈0.8 fm2 . Nevertheless,<br />

the mean-square radii are in the range<br />

〈r 2 E (proton)〉 ≈〈r2 M (proton)〉<br />

≈〈r 2 M (neutron)〉 ≈0.7 − 0.8 fm 2 . (6.46)<br />

The estimate for the proton radius, given earlier in this section, by considering<br />

virtual pions, qualitatively agrees with this value. The assumption that the<br />

38 I. Sick, Phys. Lett. 576, 62 (2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!