12.12.2012 Views

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14.7. Strong Processes at High Energies 447<br />

experimentally γ is considerably smaller, γ =0.127 ± 0.009. (33)<br />

The slower logarithmic increase predicted by QCD indicates that not all the<br />

energy is distributed statistically, but that a disproportionate amount goes to a few<br />

“leading” particles. (35)<br />

Figure 14.18: Normalized distributions in charged multiplicity<br />

in the range of c.m. energies of 11.3–62.2 GeV (ISR,<br />

FNAL and Serpukhov) and at 546 GeV (UA5). [From<br />

J. G. Alner et al., (UA5 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 138B,<br />

304 (1984).]<br />

(iii) Poisson-like distributions.<br />

The cross sections for the<br />

production of events with n<br />

prongs are shown for two energies<br />

in Fig. 14.18. (33,36) The<br />

distributions are plotted as<br />

a function of z = n/〈n〉.<br />

Fig. 14.18 shows that the<br />

normalized distributions resemble<br />

a Poisson distribution,<br />

Eq. (4.3), but are somewhat<br />

broader. On the basis of scaling,<br />

it was predicted by Koba,<br />

Nielsen, and Olesen (37) that<br />

the normalized charged particle<br />

multiplicity should become<br />

independent of energy<br />

for asymptotically large energies;<br />

this is often referred to<br />

as KNO scaling. This scaling<br />

behavior appears to hold over<br />

a region of c.m. energies of<br />

about 10–70 GeV.<br />

However, at higher energies we observe in Fig. 14.18 that the tail of the distribution<br />

function broadens, so that “asymptotia” has not yet been reached.<br />

High-Energy Theorems (Asymptotia) Processes at ultrahigh energies can be<br />

extremely complex. It is nevertheless possible to extrapolate lower-energy data to<br />

predict features of cross sections that should emerge as the total energy in the c.m.,<br />

33 C. Geich–Gimbel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4, 1527 (1989).<br />

34 E. Fermi, Phys. Rev. 81, 683 (1951); L. D. Landau, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 17, 51 (1953)<br />

[transl. Collected Papers of L. D. Landau, (D. ter Haar, ed.)] Pergamon Press and Gordon and<br />

Breach, New York, 1965; M. Kretzschmar, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 10, 765 (1958); D. Kharzeev,<br />

E. Levin and M. Nardi, Nucl. Phys. A 747, 609(2005); .<br />

35 E. M. Friedlander and R. M. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D28, 2903 (1983).<br />

36 G. J. Alner et al., (UA5 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B138, 304 (1984).<br />

37 Z. Koba, H. B. Nielsen, and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B40, 317 (1972); T. Renk, S.A. Bass and<br />

D.K. Srivastava, Phys. Lett. B 632, 632 (2006).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!