12.12.2012 Views

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

404 The Electroweak Theory of the Standard Model<br />

Furthermore, the finiteness of the results of higher order electromagnetic processes<br />

requires gauge invariance, which in turn requires zero mass particles. How, then,<br />

can the massive bosons be incorporated? Glashow discussed this problem in 1961, (2)<br />

realized that it was a “principal stumbling block,” and suggested neutral currents.<br />

Both Salam and Weinberg believed that the spontaneous symmetry breaking introduced<br />

in chapter 12 could provide masses to the “intermediate” bosons in a gauge<br />

theory which begins with massless particles, and that the resultant theory would<br />

be finite. (3) The mathematical proof of the fact that a finite theory, to all orders<br />

in the appropriate coupling constant, could be constructed in this manner did not<br />

come until later. (4) The proof makes use of the important point that the symmetry<br />

breaking does not spoil the gauge invariance of the theory. The electroweak theory<br />

was formulated and predicted the masses of the W + and Z 0 before these particles<br />

were found experimentally.<br />

13.2 The Gauge Bosons and Weak Isospin<br />

If a theory is to combine electromagnetism and the weak interactions, it must include<br />

the photon as well as the massive intermediate bosons. A gauge theory, as described<br />

in Section 12.4, requires that the charged bosons be supplemented by a neutral one<br />

in order to make an isospin multiplet and to have current conservation. The massive<br />

gauge bosons do not have strong interactions, thus the relationship between them is<br />

called “weak isospin”. Since there are three charge states, corresponding to charged<br />

and neutral currents, the intermediate boson must have weak isospin 1. These<br />

particles are not necessarily those observed in nature. Nevertheless, we call the three<br />

gauge bosons W + ,W − ,andW 0 ; they have zero mass to begin with, as required by<br />

a gauge theory. In addition, there is a neutral “electromagnetic” field with a weak<br />

isospin singlet particle we shall call the B 0 . Then, in the theory of Weinberg and<br />

Salam, the neutral particles associated with the weak and electromagnetic fields,<br />

andobservedinnature,theZ 0 and the photon, are mixtures of the B 0 and the W 0 ,<br />

γ =cosθW B 0 − sin θW W 0 , Z 0 =cosθW W 0 +sinθW B 0 . (13.1)<br />

The mixing angle θW is called the Weinberg angle and can be determined from<br />

experiment, as we shall see. The photon and Z 0 are mixtures of a weak isospin<br />

singlet, B 0 , and a component, W 0 , of the isospin triplet W bosons. They are not<br />

simple particles, even though the photon has zero mass. We have seen in chapter 10<br />

that the photon is a mixture of isospin zero and one for strong isospin; now we see<br />

that the photon is also a mixture of weak isospin zero and one. The Higgs mechanism<br />

is responsible for giving the W and Z bosons their masses. The masses of the Z 0<br />

2 S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961).<br />

3 S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967); A. Salam, Nobel Symposium, No. 8 (N.<br />

Svartholm, ed.), Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968, p. 367.<br />

4 G. ‘t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B33, 173 (1971), B35, 167 (1971); G. ‘t Hooft and M. Veltman,<br />

Nucl. Phys. B44, 189 (1972), B50, 318 (1972).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!