12.12.2012 Views

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.12. Massive Neutrinos 363<br />

11.12 Massive Neutrinos<br />

In our treatment so far we have assumed massless neutrinos. In Section 11.2, we<br />

pointed out that the high energy end of the beta spectrum can be used to search<br />

for a finite electron neutrino mass and yields a limit of m(νe)c 2 < 2.2 eV. Similarly,<br />

searches for masses of νµ and ντ give m(νµ)c 2 ≤ 0.19 MeV and m(ντ)c 2 ≤ 18.2MeV.<br />

Because the masses of neutrinos are so much smaller than the masses of the other<br />

particles, they were assumed to carry no mass in the Standard Model (Chapter 13.)<br />

Here the mystery story starts with two experiments that were not motivated<br />

by measuring neutrino masses: one was the IMB-collaboration detector that was<br />

mounted to search for proton decay and the other was the Homestake-mine Cl detector<br />

set up to detect neutrinos from the Sun and confirm the mechanisms for<br />

production of solar energy (the intensity of light produced by the Sun is directly<br />

related to the intensity of neutrinos, see Problem 11.46.) The IMB-collaboration<br />

detector did not find any evidence for proton decay but proved able to detect and<br />

identify the flavor of neutrinos that are produced in the upper atmosphere (called<br />

atmospheric neutrinos). Both detectors found something unexpected: the IMB detector<br />

(28) determined that the ratio of muon neutrinos to electron neutrinos from<br />

the upper atmosphere was approximately a factor of 2 too small compared to expectations<br />

and the Homestake-mine Cl detector found only ≈ 1/3 of the electron<br />

neutrinos expected from the Sun. (29) For many years it was thought that the solutions<br />

to these problems were unrelated. (30) Many scientists thought, for example,<br />

that the solar neutrino problem was due to lack of proper understanding of the solar<br />

physics. Other detectors were built to confirm the findings and better understand<br />

them and eventually it became clear that neutrinos do have mass and undergo flavor<br />

oscillations. A detector built in Japan, Super-Kamiokande, showed clear evidence<br />

for atmospheric neutrino oscillations (31) and a Canadian-American collaboration,<br />

the SNO detector, showed clear evidence for solar neutrino oscillations. (32)<br />

Assuming that there are 3 kinds of neutrinos, ν1, ν2, andν3 with corresponding<br />

masses m1, m2 and m3, and that weak decays produce neutrinos not in a pure mass<br />

eigenstate, but in a general linear combination of all possible states, we have:<br />

⎛<br />

⎝<br />

νe<br />

νµ<br />

ντ<br />

⎞<br />

⎠ =<br />

⎛<br />

⎝<br />

Ve1 Ve2 Ve3<br />

Vµ1 Vµ2 Vµ3<br />

Vτ 1 Vτ 2 Vτ 3<br />

⎞<br />

⎠<br />

⎛<br />

⎝<br />

ν1<br />

ν2<br />

ν3<br />

⎞<br />

⎠ . (11.79)<br />

This should be reminiscent of Eq. 11.59 but here the matrix is called the Pontecorvo-<br />

Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix. (33) To simplify our equations we assume only two<br />

28 D. Casper et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2561 (1991).<br />

29 J.N. Bahcall and R. Davis, jr. Science 191, 264 (1976).<br />

30 For a very nice description of the history see J.N. Bahcall, posted at the Nobel prize web site:<br />

http://nobelprize.org/physics/articles/bahcall/index.html .<br />

31 Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).<br />

32 Q.R. Ahmad et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).<br />

33 V.N. Gribov and B.M. Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. B28, 493 (1969); Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!