12.12.2012 Views

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

440 Strong Interactions<br />

isotropic, as displayed in Fig. 14.12(a). (20) At higher energies, however, the behavior<br />

is very different from the one sketched in Fig. 14.11.<br />

A measurement at a neutron energy of 418 MeV is reproduced in<br />

Fig. 14.12(b). (21) The differential cross section displays a pronounced peak in the<br />

backward direction. Such a behavior cannot be understood with an ordinary potential<br />

that leaves the neutron a neutron and the proton a proton.<br />

It is evidence for an exchange force that changes the incoming<br />

neutron into a proton through the exchange of<br />

a charged meson with the target proton. The forwardmoving<br />

neutron now has become a proton, and the recoiling<br />

target proton a neutron. In effect, then, the neutron<br />

is observed in the backward direction after scattering.<br />

The exchange nature of the nucleon–nucleon force<br />

can also be understood simply from the Yukawa meson<br />

exchange theory. As shown in Fig. 14.13, the exchange<br />

of a charged meson transfers the charge from the proton<br />

to the neutron and vice versa, sothatanexchange<br />

force results.<br />

Figure 14.13: Charged-pionexchange<br />

force between a<br />

neutron and proton.<br />

Spin–Orbit Force The existence of a spin–orbit interaction can be seen in scattering<br />

experiments involving either polarized particles or polarized targets. (22) The<br />

idea underlying such experiments can be explained with a simple example, the scattering<br />

of polarized nucleons from a spinless target nucleus, for instance, 4 He or 12 C.<br />

Assume that the nucleon–nucleus force is attractive; it then gives rise to trajectories<br />

as shown in Fig. 14.14(a). Assume further that the two incoming protons are fully<br />

polarized, with spins pointing “up,” perpendicular to the scattering plane. Proton<br />

1, scattered to the right, has an orbital angular momentum L1 with respect to the<br />

nucleus that is pointing “down.” Proton 2, scattered to the left, has its orbital<br />

angular momentum L2 “up.” Assume that the nuclear force consists of two terms,<br />

a central potential, Vc, andaspin–orbit potential of the form VLSL · σ,<br />

V = Vc + VLSL · σ. (14.35)<br />

Figure 14.14(b) implies that the scalar product L · σ has opposite signs for nucleons<br />

1 and 2. Consequently, the total potential V is larger for one nucleon than for the<br />

other, and more polarized nucleons will be scattered to one side than to the other.<br />

20 J. C. Alred, A. H. Armstrong, and L. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 91, 90 (1953).<br />

21 D. V. Bugg, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., (D. H. Wilkinson, ed.) 7, 47 (1981).<br />

22 For a nice introduction see H.H. Barshall, Am. Jour. Phys. 35, 119 (1967); for current<br />

issues see Proceedings of the 16th International Spin <strong>Physics</strong> Symposium and Workshop on Polarized<br />

Electron Sources and Polarimeters, SPIN2004, F. Bradamante, A. Bressan, A. Martin, K.<br />

Aulenbacher eds., World Sci. (2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!