12.12.2012 Views

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

224 Angular Momentum and Isospin<br />

(If needed, the commutator can be calculated with Eqs. (5.20) and (5.6).) The<br />

component of the angular momentum along the field, however, still remains conserved.<br />

It is customary to select the quantization axis z along the magnetic field.<br />

Equations (5.6) and (5.20) then give<br />

[H0 + Hmag,Jz] =0. (8.12)<br />

The system is still invariant under rotations about the direction of the externally<br />

applied field, namely the z axis. However, the introduction of a preferred direction<br />

through the application of the magnetic field has broken the overall symmetry, and<br />

J is no longer conserved. Before the application of the field, the energy levels<br />

of the system were (2J + 1)-fold degenerate, as shown on the left-hand side of<br />

Fig. 5.5. The introduction of the field results in a removal of the degeneracy, and<br />

the corresponding Zeeman splitting is shown in Fig. 5.5.<br />

8.3 Charge Independence of Hadronic Forces<br />

In 1932, when the neutron was discovered, the nature of the forces holding nuclei<br />

together was still mysterious. By about 1936, crucial features of the nuclear force<br />

had emerged. (2) Particularly revealing was the analysis of pp and np scattering<br />

data. Of course, at that time, such scattering experiments could be performed<br />

only at very low energies, but the outcome was still surprising: After subtracting<br />

the effect of the Coulomb force in pp scattering, it was found that the pp and<br />

the np hadronic force were of about equal strength and had about equal range. (3)<br />

This result was corroborated by studies of the masses of 3 Hand 3 He which gave<br />

approximately equal values for the pp, np, andnn interactions. Strong evidence<br />

for a charge independence of the nuclear forces was also found by Feenberg and<br />

Wigner. (4) Charge independence for nuclear forces can be formulated by stating<br />

that the forces between any two nucleons in the same state are the same, apart from<br />

electromagnetic effects. Today, the experimental evidence for charge independence<br />

is very strong, and it is known that all hadronic forces, not just the one between<br />

nucleons, are charge-independent. (5) We shall not discuss the experimental evidence<br />

for charge independence here but only point out that the concept of isospin, which<br />

will be discussed in the following sections, is a direct consequence of the charge<br />

independence of hadronic forces.<br />

2 In 1936 and 1937, Bethe and collaborators surveyed the state of the art in a series of three<br />

articles, later known as the Bethe bible. These admirable reviews in Rev. Mod Phys. 8, 82 (1936),<br />

9, 69 (1937), and 9, 245 (1937), reprinted in Basic Bethe, Am. Inst. Phys., New York, 1986, can<br />

still be read with profit.<br />

3 G. Breit, E.U. Condon, and R.D. Present, Phys. Rev. 50, 825 (1936).<br />

4 E. Feenberg and E.P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 51, 95 (1937).<br />

5 The evidence for charge independence of the hadronic forces is discussed by G.A. Miller and<br />

W.T.H. van Oers in Symmetries and Fundamental Interactions, ed. W.C. Haxton and E.M.<br />

Henley, World Sci., Singapore (1995), p. 127.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!