12.12.2012 Views

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

Subatomic Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

534 The Shell Model<br />

S : Σili = L, Σisi = S. The total orbital angular momentum L and the<br />

total spin S of all nucleons in a shell are then added to form a given J. Inthe<br />

jj coupling scheme, the spin–orbit force is assumed to be stronger than the<br />

residual force between individual nucleons so that the spin and the angular<br />

momentum of each nucleon are added first to give a total angular momentum<br />

j; thesej’s are then combined to the total J. In most nuclei, the empirical<br />

evidence indicates that the jj coupling is closer to the truth; in the lightest<br />

nuclei (A � 16), the coupling scheme appears to be intermediate between the<br />

LS and the jj coupling.<br />

2. Residual forces between the particles outside the closed shells are introduced.<br />

That such residual interactions are needed can be seen in many ways. Consider,<br />

for instance, 69 Ga. It has three protons in state 2p 3/2 outside the<br />

closed proton shell. These three protons can add their spins to get values<br />

of J = 1 3 5 7<br />

9<br />

2 , 2 , 2 , 2 . (The state J = 2 is forbidden by the Pauli exclusion<br />

principle.) In the absence of a residual interaction, these states are degenerate.<br />

Experimentally, one state is observed to be lowest—quite often the<br />

in this case). There must be an interaction that splits these<br />

state J = j(= 3<br />

2<br />

degenerate states. In principle, one should derive the residual interaction as<br />

what remains after the nucleon–nucleon interaction is replaced by an average<br />

single-nucleon potential. In practice, such a program is too difficult, and the<br />

residual interaction is determined empirically. However, many of the features<br />

of the residual interaction can be understood on theoretical ground. Consider<br />

as an example the pairing force described in Section 17.1. We have pointed out<br />

there that two like nucleons prefer to be in an antisymmetric spin state, with<br />

spins opposed and with a relative orbital angular momentum of zero ( 1S0). If<br />

the residual force has a very short range and is attractive, this behavior can<br />

be understood immediately. Consider for simplicity a zero-range force. The<br />

two nucleons can take advantage of such a residual attraction only when they<br />

are in a relative s state; the exclusion principle then forces their spins to be<br />

opposed, as is observed in reality. Although the true nuclear forces are not of<br />

such short range (indeed there is a repulsion at about 0.5 fm), the net effect is<br />

unchanged. The energy gained by the action of the pairing force is called pairing<br />

energy, and it is found empirically to be of the order of 12A−1/2 MeV. The<br />

pairing energy leads to an understanding of the energies of the first excited<br />

states of even–even nuclei: A pair must be broken, and the corresponding first<br />

excited state lies roughly 1–2 MeV above the ground state.<br />

3. Descriptions of nuclei with the inclusion of a dynamic treatment of closed<br />

shells have become possible thanks to advanced computers. Such “extended”<br />

shell model calculations allow the excitation of closed shell nucleons into open,<br />

vacant ones, leaving behind holes. These extended shell models have been successful,<br />

for instance in understanding level structure, electromagnetic transi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!