08.11.2017 Views

gat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Some parts of the country were more resistant to the dumbing down of curriculum and the<br />

psychosocializing of the classroom than others, but by a process of attrition Prussianization gained<br />

important beachheads year by year—through private foundation projects, textbook publishing,<br />

supervisory associations, and on through every aspect of school. The psychological manipulation<br />

of the child suggested by Plato had been investi<strong>gat</strong>ed by Locke, raised to clinical status by<br />

Rousseau, refined into materialist method by Helvetius and Herbart, justified philosophically as<br />

the essential religion by Comte, and scientized by Wundt. One does not educate machines, one<br />

adjusts them.<br />

The peculiar undertaking of educational psychology was begun by Edward Thorndike of Teachers<br />

College in 1903. Thorndike, whose once famous puzzle box became the Skinner box of later<br />

behavioral psychology after minor modifications, was the protégé of Wundtians Judd and<br />

Armstrong at Wesleyan, taking his Ph.D. under Wundtian Cattell before being offered a post by<br />

Wundtian Russell at Teachers College.<br />

According to Thorndike, the aim of a teacher is to "produce and prevent certain responses," and<br />

the purpose of education is to promote "adjustment." In Elementary Principles of Education<br />

(1929), he urged the deconstruction of emphasis on "intellectual resources" for the young, advice<br />

that was largely taken. It was bad advice in light of modern brain research suggesting direct ties<br />

between the size and complexity of the brain and strenuous thought grappled with early on.<br />

Thorndike said intelligence was virtually set at birth—real change was impossible—a scientific<br />

pronouncement which helped to justify putting the brakes on ambitious curricula. But in the<br />

vitally important behavioral area—in beliefs, attitudes, and loyalties—Thorndike did not<br />

disappoint the empty-child crowd. In those areas so important to corporate and government<br />

health, children were to be as malleable as anyone could want them. An early ranking of school<br />

kids by intelligence would allow them to be separated into tracks for behavioral processing.<br />

Thorndike soon became a driving force in the growth of national testing, a new institution which<br />

would have consigned Benjamin Franklin and Andrew Carnegie to reform school and Edison to<br />

Special Education. Even before we got the actual test, Thorndike became a significant political<br />

ally of the semicovert sterilization campaign taking place in America.<br />

That pioneering eugenic program seemed socially beneficial to those casually aware of it, and it<br />

was enthusiastically championed by some genuine American legends like Oliver Wendell Holmes<br />

Jr. But if you find yourself nodding in agreement that morons have no business with babies, you<br />

might want to consider that according to Thorndike’s fellow psychologist H.H. Goddard at<br />

Princeton, 83 percent of all Jews and 79 percent of all Italians were in the mental defective class.<br />

The real difficulty with scientific psychology or other scientific social science is that it seems to be<br />

able to produce proof of anything on command, convincing proof, too, delivered by sincere men<br />

and women just trying to get along by going along.<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Page 318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!