08.11.2017 Views

gat

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nothing familiar, the children were told, should remain unexamined or go unchallenged. The<br />

old-fashioned was to be discarded. Indeed, the study of history itself was stopped. Respect for<br />

tradition was held sentimental and counterproductive. Only one thing could not be challenged,<br />

and that was the school religion itself, where even minor rebellion was dealt with harshly.<br />

Second, the scientific curriculum asked for objectivity, for the suppression of human feelings<br />

which stand in the way of pursuing knowledge as the ultimate good. Thinking works best when<br />

everything is considered an equally lifeless object. Then things can be regarded with objectivity.<br />

Of course kids resist this deadening of nature and so have to be trained to see nature as<br />

mechanical. Have no feeling for the frog you dissect or the butterfly you kill for a school<br />

project—soon you may have no feeling for the humiliation of your classmates or the enfeeblement<br />

of your own parents. After all, humiliation constitutes the major tool of behavior control in<br />

schools, a tool used alike to control students, teachers, and administrators.<br />

Third, the scientific curriculum advised neutrality. Make no lasting commitments to anything<br />

because loyalty and sentiment spell the end of flexibility; they close off options.<br />

Last, the new scheme demanded that visible things which could be numbered and counted be<br />

acknowledged as the only reality. God could not exist; He could not be seen.<br />

The religion of Science says there is no good or evil. Experts will tell you what to feel based on<br />

pragmatic considerations. Since there is no free will nor any divine morality, there is no such thing<br />

as individual responsibility, no sin, no redemption. Just mathematical decision-making; grounded<br />

in utilitarianism or the lex talionis, it makes little difference which. The religion of Science says<br />

that work is for fools. Machines can be built to do hard work, and what machines don’t do,<br />

servants and wage slaves can. Work as little as you can get away with—that’s how the new<br />

success is measured. The religion of Science says good feelings and physical sensations are what<br />

life is all about.<br />

Drugs are such an important part of feeling good we began to need drugstores to sell the many<br />

varieties available. People should try virtually everything; that is the message of the drug- store<br />

and all advertising. Leave no stone unturned in the search for sensual pleasure. With<br />

science-magic you don’t even have to worry about a hangover. Simply take vitamin B and keep<br />

on drinking—nor need you worry about incurring the responsibility of a family with the advent of<br />

cheap contraceptives and risk-free legal abortion. Lastly, the religion of Science teaches that<br />

death, aging, and sickness are ultimate evils. With pills, potions, lotions, aerobics, and surgery you<br />

can stave off death and aging, and eventually the magical medical industry will erase those<br />

scourges from human affairs.<br />

There. It is done. See how point for point the curriculum of Science, upgraded from an instrument<br />

to a religion, revokes each of the penalties Christianity urges we accept gladly? See how Science<br />

can be sold as the nostrum to grant absolute absolution from spiritual covenants?<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Page 334

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!