08.11.2017 Views

gat

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

associations, grant-making bodies, and national media inoculated the learning system with these<br />

ideas, and local managers grew fearful of punishment for opposition.<br />

In 1962, an NIMH-sponsored report, "The Role of Schools in Mental Health," stated<br />

unambiguously, "Education does not mean teaching people to know." (emphasis added) What<br />

then? "It means teaching them to behave as they do not behave," a clear echo of the Rockefeller<br />

Foundation’s "dream" from an earlier part of the century (See page 45). Schools were behavioral<br />

engineering plants; what remained was to convince kids and parents there was no place to hide.<br />

The report was featured at the 1962 Governor’s Conference, appearing along with a proclamation<br />

calling on all states to fund these new school programs and use every state agency to further the<br />

work. Provisions were discussed to overturn resistance on the part of parents; tough cases, it was<br />

advised, could be subjected to multiple pressures around the clock until they stopped resisting.<br />

Meanwhile, alarming statistics were circulated about the rapid growth of mental illness within<br />

society.<br />

The watershed moment when modern schooling swept all competition from the field was the<br />

passage of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act in 1965 (ESEA). The Act allocated<br />

substantial federal funds to psychological and psychiatric programs in school, opening the door to<br />

a full palette of "interventions" by psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, agencies, and<br />

various specialists. All were invited to use the schoolhouse as a satellite office, in urban ghettos,<br />

as a primary office. Now it was the law.<br />

Along the way to this milestone, important way stations were reached beyond the scope of this<br />

book to list. The strand I’ve shown is only one of many in the tapestry. The psychological goals of<br />

this project and the quality of mind in back of them are caught fairly in the keynote address to the<br />

1973 Childhood International Education Seminar in Boulder, Colorado, delivered by Harvard<br />

psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce. This quote appears to have been edited out of printed transcripts<br />

of the talk, but was reported by newspapers in actual attendance:<br />

Every child in America entering school at the age of five is mentally ill because<br />

he comes to school with certain allegiances to our founding fathers, toward our<br />

elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being,<br />

and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It’s up to you as<br />

teachers to make all these sick children well—by creating the international<br />

child of the future.<br />

Perhaps it’s only a fortuitous coincidence that in the ongoing psychologization of schools<br />

from1903 onwards, the single most prominent thread—the nearly universal prescription for<br />

better-ment offered by every agency, analyst, and spokesperson for mental health—has been the<br />

end of competition in every aspect of training and the substitution of cooperation and intergroup,<br />

interpersonal harmony. In utopia, everyone has a fixed place. Envy and ambition are unwelcome,<br />

at least among the common classes. The prescription should sound familiar, we’ve encountered it<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Page 324

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!