KARL MARX

LONDON
217
and some of the linen, stayed two nights with the Herweghs, and followed
Marx to Brussels a few days later.
NOTES
1. A. Ruge, Briefwechsel, ed. P. Nerrlich (Berlin, 1886) 1 295.
2. Marx to A. Ruge, 'A Correspondence of 1843', Early Texts, p. 74.
3. Ibid.
4. K. Marx, 'A Correspondence of 1843', Early Texts, p. 79.
5. Marx to A. Ruge, MEW xxvii, 416.
6. Ibid.
7. Ibid.
8. The language here is ironically borrowed from exchanges between the censorship
authorities and the Rheinische Zeitung.
9. Jenny von Westphalen to Marx, MEW, Ergsbd. 1 644 f.
10. Cf. F. Kugelmann, 'Small Traits of Marx's great Character', in Reminiscences,
p. 279.
11. K. Marx, 'Preface' to A Critique of Political Economy, MEWS 1 362.
12. Marx to A. Ruge, MEW XXVII 397.
13. K. Marx, 'Preface' to A Critique of Political Economy, MESW 1 362.
14. See D. McLellan, The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx, pp. 92 ff. That Marx
was very probably not the author of the article 'Luther as Judge between
Strauss and Feuerbach' has been shown by H. M. Sass 'Feuerbach Statt
Marx', International Review of Social History (1967).
15. L. Feuerbach, Siimtliche Werke (Stuttgart, 1959) n 226.
16. L. Feuerbach, op. cit., p. 239.
17. Marx to Ruge, MEGA 1 i (2) 308.
18. There is an excellent edition of Marx's manuscript: K. Marx, Critique of
Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right', ed. J. O'Malley (Cambridge, 1970). See also L.
Dupre, The Philosophical Foundations of Marxism (New York, 1966) pp. 87 ff.;
S. Avineri, 'The Hegelian Origins of Marx's Political Thought', Review of
Metaphysics (September 1967); H. Lefebvre, The Sociology of Marx (London,
1968) pp. 123 ff.; J. Hyppolite, 'La Conception hegelienne de l'Etat et sa
critique par Karl Marx', Etudes sur Marx et Hegel, 2nd ed. (Paris, 1965); J.
Barion, Hegel und die marxistische Staatslehre (Bonn, 1963).
19. Hegel's political philosophy was undoubtedly rather ambivalent: on the one
hand he described the French Revolution as a 'glorious dawn' and throughout
his life drank a toast on the anniversary of the fall of the Bastille; on the
other hand many of his pronouncements, particularly later in life, tended to
a more conservative, not to say reactionary position. On the question of how
liberal in politics Hegel really was, see Z. A. Pelczynski's introduction to