21.05.2018 Views

KARL MARX

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

*<br />

61 <strong>KARL</strong> <strong>MARX</strong>: A BIOGRAPHY<br />

published in Switzerland in February 1843 in a collection of essays that<br />

had been censored from Ruge's Deutsche Jahrbucher. In them Feuerbach<br />

applied to speculative philosophy the approach he had already used with<br />

regard to religion: theology had still not been completely destroyed; it<br />

had a last rational bulwark in Hegel's philosophy, which was as great a<br />

mystification as any theology. Since Hegel's dialectic started and ended<br />

with the infinite, the finite - namely, man - was only a phase in the<br />

evolution of a superhuman spirit: 'The essence of theology is transcendent<br />

and exteriorised human thought.' 1 s But philosophy should not start from<br />

God or the Absolute, nor even from being as predicate of the Absolute;<br />

philosophy had to begin with the finite, the particular, the real, and<br />

acknowledge the primacy of the senses. Since this approach had been<br />

pioneered by the French, the true philosopher would have to be of 'Gallo-<br />

Germanic blood'. Hegel's philosophy was the last refuge of theology and<br />

as such had to be abolished. This would come about from a realisation<br />

that 'the true relationship of thought to being is this: being is the subject,<br />

thought the predicate. Thought arises from being - being does not arise<br />

from thought.' 16<br />

Marx read a copy of Feuerbach's Theses immediately after publication<br />

and wrote an enthusiastic letter to Ruge, who had sent it to him: 'The<br />

only point in Feuerbach's aphorisms that does not satisfy me is that he<br />

gives too much importance to nature and too little to politics. Yet an<br />

alliance with politics affords the only means for contemporary philosophy<br />

to become a truth. But what happened in the sixteenth century, when the<br />

state had followers as enthusiastic as those of Nature, will no doubt be<br />

repeated.' 17 For Marx, the way ahead lay through politics, but a politics<br />

which questioned current conceptions of the relationship of the state to<br />

society. It was Feuerbach's Theses that enabled him to effect his particular<br />

reversal of Hegel's dialectic. As far as Marx was concerned in 1843 (and<br />

this was true of most of his radical democratic contemporaries also)<br />

Feuerbach was the philosopher. Every page of the critique of Hegel's<br />

political philosophy that Marx elaborated during the summer of 1843<br />

showed the influence of Feuerbach's method. True, Marx gave his criticism<br />

a social and historical dimension lacking in Feuerbach, but one point was<br />

central to both their approaches: the claim that Hegel had reversed the<br />

correct relation of subjects and predicates. Marx's fundamental idea was<br />

to take actual political institutions and demonstrate thereby that Hegel's<br />

conception of the relationship of ideas to reality was mistaken. Hegel had<br />

tried to reconcile the ideal and the real by showing that reality was the<br />

unfolding of an idea, and was thus rational. Marx, on the contrary, emphasised<br />

the opposition between ideals and reality in the secular world and<br />

categorised Hegel's whole enterprise as speculative, by which he meant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!