21.05.2018 Views

KARL MARX

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE LAST DECADE 4II<br />

4ii<br />

'is such that it moves to a general European war. We must go through<br />

this war before we can think of any decisive external effectiveness of the<br />

Kuropean working class.' 65 The only country in which there existed a<br />

proletarian party was Germany, to which, as Marx had foreseen, the<br />

centre of gravity of the workers' movement shifted after the Franco-<br />

Prussian War. It was Germany that occupied most of Marx's attention<br />

during the 1870s. More accurately, there were two proletarian parties in<br />

Germany, the Eisenach party and the followers of Lassalle, and the early<br />

1870s saw attempts to bring about a union between them. This was aided<br />

by the unification of Germany under Prussian leadership, the resignation<br />

of Schweitzer from the presidency of the Lassallean party, and the increasing<br />

pressure which Bismarck applied to both parties in the aftermath of<br />

the Paris Commune. When their first big electoral success showed that the<br />

two parties polled an almost identical number of votes, negotiations were<br />

opened and agreement reached in principle at the end of 1874. A united<br />

programme was to be adopted at Gotha, a small town in central Germany,<br />

in May 1875.<br />

Marx and Engels were somewhat out of touch with the situation inside<br />

Germany, 66 and were enraged both with the content of the programme<br />

and with the fact that they had not been consulted. Engels composed a<br />

long letter to Bebel in March 1875 in which he recapitulated the unacceptable<br />

Lassallean propositions incorporated in the programme: the rejection<br />

of all non-proletarian parties as a 'reactionary mass', the lack of international<br />

spirit, the talk of the 'iron laws' of wages and the lack of consideration<br />

given to trade unions. And he predicted that they would have to<br />

break with Liebknecht if the programme were adopted. 67 Marx himself<br />

wrote to Bracke in May that 'every step of real movement is more<br />

important than a dozen programmes'. 68 In Marx's view the Eisenach party<br />

should have confined itself to concluding some sort of practical agreement<br />

for combined action. As it was, he and Engels would dissociate themselves<br />

from the programme immediately after the Congress. The letter<br />

accompanied a manuscript entitled 'Marginal Notes on the Programme<br />

of the German Workers' Party' which he asked Bracke to circulate among<br />

the Eisenach leaders. Liebknecht, who considered that the negotiations<br />

were too far advanced to be suspended, only allowed a few Eisenach<br />

leaders to see the document - and not, for example, Bebel. It was published<br />

only in 1891 and became known as the Critique of the Gotha<br />

Programme, one of the most important of Marx's theoretical writings.<br />

The Critique of the Gotha Programme took the form of marginal notes<br />

ind contained two main points: one being a criticism of the programme's<br />

proposals for distributing the national product, the other being a criticism<br />

ol its views on the state. On the first point, Marx objected to the attempt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!