17.12.2012 Views

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Example 1<br />

It there are no restrictions on the geometry of the new<br />

cross-ribbed wall design, the curve can be used to<br />

determine the dimension that will satisfy a required<br />

reduction in part weight.<br />

FLAT PLATE RIBBED STRUCTURE<br />

Known: Present wall thickness (tA) = 0.0675 in<br />

Required: Material reduction equals 40% or:<br />

VB = 0.60<br />

VA From Figure 4.08:<br />

(tA) (N) = 0.135, or N = 0.135 × 1 = 2 ribs per in<br />

W 0.0675<br />

tB = 0.437, or: tB = (0.437) (0.0675)<br />

tA = 0.030 in wall thickness<br />

T = 1.875, or: T = (1.875) (0.0675)<br />

tA = 0.127 in rib plus wall thickness<br />

Example 2<br />

If melt flow of the resin limits the redesigned wall<br />

thickness, part geometry can be calculated as follows:<br />

Known: Present wall thickness (tA) = 0.050 in<br />

Required: Minimum wall thickness (tB) = 0.020 in<br />

or tB = 0.020 = 0.4<br />

tA 0.050<br />

From Figure 4.08:<br />

T = 1.95, or: T = (1.95) (0.050) = 0.098 in<br />

tA (tA) (N) = 0.125, or N = 0.125 × 1 = 2.5 ribs per in<br />

W 0.05<br />

VB = 0.55<br />

VA Thus, the 0.02 inch wall design has an overall height<br />

of 0.098 inch, a rib spacing of 2.5 per inch (5 ribs<br />

every 2 inches) and a 45 percent material saving.<br />

Example 3<br />

If the overall wall thickness is the limitation because<br />

of internal or exterior size of the part, other dimensions<br />

can be found on the curve:<br />

27<br />

Known: Present wall thickness (tA) = 0.25 in<br />

Required: Maximum height of ribbed wall<br />

(T) = 0.425 in<br />

or T = 0.425 = 1.7<br />

tA 0.25<br />

From Figure 4.08:<br />

(tA) (N) = 0.165, or N = 0.165 × 1 = 0.66 rib per in<br />

W 0.250<br />

tB = 0.53, or: tB = (0.53) (0.25) = 0.133 in<br />

tA V B = 0.71<br />

V A<br />

The ribbed design provides a material reduction of<br />

29 percent, will use 0.66 ribs per inch (2 ribs every<br />

3 inches) and will have a wall thickness of 0.133 inch.<br />

If thinner ribs are desired <strong>for</strong> functional or appearance<br />

reasons, the same structure can be obtained by holding<br />

the product of the number of ribs and the rib thickness<br />

constant. In this example, if the rib wall thickness<br />

were cut in half to 0.067 inch, the number of ribs<br />

should be increased from 2 every 3 inches to 4 every<br />

3 inches.<br />

Example 4<br />

If the number of ribs per inch is limited because of<br />

possible interference with internal components of the<br />

product, or by the need to match rib spacing with an<br />

adjoining structure or decorative elements, the designer<br />

can specify the number of ribs and then determine<br />

the other dimensions which will provide a<br />

minimum volume.<br />

Known: Present wall thickness (tA) = 0.0875 in<br />

Required: Ribs per in (N) = 2<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>for</strong> a base (W) of unity:<br />

(tA) (N) = (0.0875) (2) = 0.175<br />

W 1<br />

From Figure 4.08:<br />

tB = 0.56, or: TB = (0.56) (0.0875) = 0.049 in<br />

tA T = 1.67, or: T = (1.67) (0.0875) = 0.146 in<br />

t A<br />

V B = 0.75<br />

V A<br />

The resulting design has an overall height of 0.127<br />

inch, a wall thickness of 0.063 inch and a material<br />

saving of 25 percent. (An alternate solution obtained<br />

with a V B/V A value of 0.90 provides a material saving<br />

of only 10 percent. The choice depends on the suitability<br />

of wall thickness and overall height.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!