General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
For the example illustrated, F is about 3 cm2 and the<br />
mean weld diameter d = 60 mm. Starting at 3 cm2 on<br />
the left-hand scale, there<strong>for</strong>e we proceed towards the<br />
right to meet the line which corresponds to a diameter<br />
of 60 (Point 1), and then proceed vertically upwards.<br />
A convenient diameter and associated length of<br />
flywheel (see Figure 11.28) are chosen. But the<br />
diameter should always be greater than the length, so<br />
as to keep the total length of the rotating flywheel as<br />
small as possible. In the example illustrated, a diameter<br />
of approximately 84 mm has been chosen, giving<br />
a length of 80 mm (Point 2).<br />
The nomogram is based on a peripheral speed of<br />
10 m/sec, which gives about 3,200 rpm in this example<br />
(60 mm diameter). A higher speed can be<br />
chosen, say 4000 rpm, which corresponds to Point 3.<br />
The tool dimensions obtained by moving upwards<br />
from this point will of course be smaller than be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />
In this example we have Point 4, which corresponds to<br />
a diameter of 78 mm and a length of 70 mm.<br />
Moving towards the right from the point corresponding<br />
to 3 cm2 , the corresponding welding <strong>for</strong>ce required<br />
is read off from the right-hand scale; in this case,<br />
about 1500 N.<br />
This nomogram considers only the external dimensions<br />
of the tools, and ignores the fact that they are not<br />
solid; but the jig to some extent compensates <strong>for</strong> this,<br />
and the values given by the nomogram are accurate<br />
enough.<br />
Figure 11.27 Welding parameters example<br />
θ d<br />
F<br />
θ d<br />
F<br />
90<br />
Figure 11.28 Flywheel size example<br />
θ D<br />
Motor Power<br />
In addition to their many other advantages, inertia<br />
tools require only a very low driving power.<br />
In a fully or semiautomatic machine, the entire cycle<br />
lasts between 1 and 2 seconds, so that the motor has<br />
sufficient time to accelerate the flyweight up to its<br />
operating speed. During welding the kinetic energy of<br />
the tool is so quickly converted into heat that considerable<br />
power is generated.<br />
For example, if the two tools considered in the nomogram<br />
of Figure 11.26 are stopped in 0.05 sec, they<br />
will produce about 3 kW during this time. If a period<br />
of 1 second is available <strong>for</strong> accelerating again <strong>for</strong> the<br />
next welding cycle, a rating of only 150 W would<br />
theoretically be required.<br />
0.5 kW motors are sufficient to weld most of the parts<br />
encountered in practice.<br />
We have already mentioned that it is highly desirable<br />
to be able to vary the speed. With production machinery<br />
which always welds identical parts, the speed can<br />
be adjusted by changing the belt pulleys.<br />
P<br />
Quality Control of Welded Parts<br />
To ensure uni<strong>for</strong>m quality, the joint profiles should<br />
first be checked on a profile projector to see that they<br />
fit accurately. Bad misfits and excessive variations in<br />
diameter (due to molding tolerances) cause difficulties<br />
in welding and poor quality welds. Correctly dimensioned<br />
joint profiles and carefully molded parts will<br />
render systematic checking at a later stage superfluous.