17.12.2012 Views

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For the example illustrated, F is about 3 cm2 and the<br />

mean weld diameter d = 60 mm. Starting at 3 cm2 on<br />

the left-hand scale, there<strong>for</strong>e we proceed towards the<br />

right to meet the line which corresponds to a diameter<br />

of 60 (Point 1), and then proceed vertically upwards.<br />

A convenient diameter and associated length of<br />

flywheel (see Figure 11.28) are chosen. But the<br />

diameter should always be greater than the length, so<br />

as to keep the total length of the rotating flywheel as<br />

small as possible. In the example illustrated, a diameter<br />

of approximately 84 mm has been chosen, giving<br />

a length of 80 mm (Point 2).<br />

The nomogram is based on a peripheral speed of<br />

10 m/sec, which gives about 3,200 rpm in this example<br />

(60 mm diameter). A higher speed can be<br />

chosen, say 4000 rpm, which corresponds to Point 3.<br />

The tool dimensions obtained by moving upwards<br />

from this point will of course be smaller than be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />

In this example we have Point 4, which corresponds to<br />

a diameter of 78 mm and a length of 70 mm.<br />

Moving towards the right from the point corresponding<br />

to 3 cm2 , the corresponding welding <strong>for</strong>ce required<br />

is read off from the right-hand scale; in this case,<br />

about 1500 N.<br />

This nomogram considers only the external dimensions<br />

of the tools, and ignores the fact that they are not<br />

solid; but the jig to some extent compensates <strong>for</strong> this,<br />

and the values given by the nomogram are accurate<br />

enough.<br />

Figure 11.27 Welding parameters example<br />

θ d<br />

F<br />

θ d<br />

F<br />

90<br />

Figure 11.28 Flywheel size example<br />

θ D<br />

Motor Power<br />

In addition to their many other advantages, inertia<br />

tools require only a very low driving power.<br />

In a fully or semiautomatic machine, the entire cycle<br />

lasts between 1 and 2 seconds, so that the motor has<br />

sufficient time to accelerate the flyweight up to its<br />

operating speed. During welding the kinetic energy of<br />

the tool is so quickly converted into heat that considerable<br />

power is generated.<br />

For example, if the two tools considered in the nomogram<br />

of Figure 11.26 are stopped in 0.05 sec, they<br />

will produce about 3 kW during this time. If a period<br />

of 1 second is available <strong>for</strong> accelerating again <strong>for</strong> the<br />

next welding cycle, a rating of only 150 W would<br />

theoretically be required.<br />

0.5 kW motors are sufficient to weld most of the parts<br />

encountered in practice.<br />

We have already mentioned that it is highly desirable<br />

to be able to vary the speed. With production machinery<br />

which always welds identical parts, the speed can<br />

be adjusted by changing the belt pulleys.<br />

P<br />

Quality Control of Welded Parts<br />

To ensure uni<strong>for</strong>m quality, the joint profiles should<br />

first be checked on a profile projector to see that they<br />

fit accurately. Bad misfits and excessive variations in<br />

diameter (due to molding tolerances) cause difficulties<br />

in welding and poor quality welds. Correctly dimensioned<br />

joint profiles and carefully molded parts will<br />

render systematic checking at a later stage superfluous.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!