General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Calculations <strong>for</strong> Inertia Welding Tools<br />
and Machines<br />
In order to bring a plastic from a solid to a molten<br />
state a certain amount of heat, which depends on the<br />
type of material, is necessary. <strong>Engineering</strong> plastics<br />
actually differ very little in this respect, and so this<br />
factor will be neglected in the following discussion.<br />
The quantity of heat required <strong>for</strong> melting is produced<br />
by the energy of the rotating masses. When the joint<br />
faces are pressed together, the friction brings the<br />
flywheel to a stop in less than a second.<br />
With plastics having a narrow melting temperature<br />
range, such as acetal resins, the tool should not per<strong>for</strong>m<br />
more than one or two revolutions once contact<br />
has been made. If the pressure between the two parts is<br />
too low, the flyweight will spin too long, and material<br />
will be sheared off as the plastic solidifies, producing<br />
welds which are weak or which will leak.<br />
This factor is not so important with amorphous<br />
plastics, which solidify more slowly. For all plastics, it<br />
is best to use higher pressures than are absolutely<br />
necessary, since in any case this will not cause the<br />
weld quality to suffer.<br />
To get good results with inertia machines, the following<br />
parameters should be observed:<br />
• Peripheral speed at the joint<br />
As far as possible, this should not be lower than<br />
10 m/sec. But with small diameter parts it is occasionally<br />
necessary to work between 5 and 10 m/sec,<br />
or else the required rpms will be too high. In general,<br />
the higher the peripheral speed, the better the<br />
result. High rpms are also advantageous <strong>for</strong> the<br />
flywheel, since the higher the speed, the smaller the<br />
mass needed <strong>for</strong> a given size of part to be joined.<br />
• The flywheel<br />
Since the energy of the flywheel is a function of its<br />
speed of rotation and of its moment of inertia, one of<br />
these parameters must be determined as a function<br />
of the other. The kinetic energy is a function of the<br />
square of the speed (rpms), so that very slight<br />
changes in speed permit adjustment to the required<br />
result. In general, <strong>for</strong> engineering plastics, the<br />
amount of ef<strong>for</strong>t needed to weld 1 cm2 of the<br />
projection of the joint area is about 50 Nm. The<br />
amount of material which has to be melted also<br />
depends on the accuracy with which the two profiles<br />
fit together, and there<strong>for</strong>e on the injection molding<br />
tolerances. It would be superfluous to carry out too<br />
accurate calculations because adjustments of the<br />
speed are generally required anyway.<br />
• Welding pressure<br />
As mentioned above, the pressure must be sufficient<br />
to bring the mass to rest within one or two revolutions.<br />
As a basis <strong>for</strong> calculation, we may assume that<br />
a specific pressure of 5 MPa projected joint area is<br />
89<br />
required. It is not enough merely to calculate the<br />
corresponding piston diameter and air pressure; the<br />
inlet pipes and valves must also be so dimensioned<br />
that the piston descends at a high speed, as otherwise<br />
pressure on the cylinder builds up too slowly.<br />
Very many of the unsatisfactory results obtained in<br />
practice stem from this cause.<br />
• Holding pressure<br />
Once the material has melted, it will take some time<br />
to resolidify, so that it is vital to keep up the pressure<br />
<strong>for</strong> a certain period, which will depend on the<br />
particular plastic, and is best determined experimentally.<br />
For Delrin ® , this is about 0.5–1 seconds, but<br />
<strong>for</strong> amorphous plastics it is longer.<br />
Graphical Determination of Welding<br />
Parameters<br />
The most important data can be determined quickly<br />
and easily from the nomogram (see Figure 11.26)<br />
which is suitable <strong>for</strong> all <strong>DuPont</strong> engineering plastics.<br />
Example: First determine the mean weld diameter d<br />
(see Figure 11.27) and the area of the projection of<br />
the joint surface F.<br />
Figure 11.26 Determination of welding parameters<br />
θ D (mm)<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
95<br />
90<br />
85<br />
80<br />
75<br />
70<br />
65<br />
60<br />
55<br />
50<br />
20<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
F (cm2 )<br />
4<br />
8,000 t,min od 5 mm<br />
7,000 28<br />
6,000 33<br />
5,000 40<br />
4,000 50<br />
3,500 57<br />
3,000 65<br />
2,500 80<br />
2,000 100<br />
1,800 110<br />
1,600 125<br />
1,400 140<br />
1,200 165<br />
1,000 200<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
90<br />
100<br />
120<br />
10,000<br />
5,000<br />
3,000<br />
2,000<br />
P (N)<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100