17.12.2012 Views

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 11.30 <strong>Design</strong>s of pressure cartridges Figure 11.31 Tightness test using vacuum<br />

X X<br />

A (poor) B (good)<br />

However, it is not possible to draw any conclusions<br />

about water or gas tightness from the mechanical<br />

strength of the joint.<br />

Pressure vessels and floats must there<strong>for</strong>e also be<br />

tested in the appropriate medium. Containers which<br />

will be under internal pressure are stressed to about<br />

half the burst pressure, which should enable all weak<br />

points to be detected. Floats and other tight containers<br />

are inspected by dipping into hot water and looking<br />

<strong>for</strong> bubbles at the joint.<br />

It is, however, quicker and more reliable to test them<br />

under vacuum and a simple apparatus like that sometimes<br />

used <strong>for</strong> testing waterproof watches will often<br />

be all that is necessary.<br />

• Figure 11.31 illustrates the basic principle.<br />

A cylindrical glass vessel a, big enough to hold the<br />

part, is covered with a loose-fitting lid b and sealed<br />

with a rubber ring. The test piece is kept under water<br />

by the sieve c. Since the water level is almost up to<br />

the top of the vessel, only a small volume of air<br />

need be pumped out to produce an adequate<br />

vacuum; in fact, only a single stroke of a small hand<br />

pump will do. The rig should preferably be fitted<br />

with an adjusting valve to limit the degree of<br />

vacuum and prevent the <strong>for</strong>mation of bubbles by<br />

boiling.<br />

Checking Weld Joints by Inspection of<br />

Microtome Sections<br />

Correct design and proper welding should render<br />

microtome sections superfluous. The making of these<br />

sections requires not only expensive equipment but<br />

also a considerable amount of experience.<br />

However, such sections can occasionally result in<br />

the discovery of the causes of poor welds as, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, in Figure 11.32, which clearly shows how<br />

the V-groove was <strong>for</strong>ced open by the welding pressure<br />

and the matching profile was not welded right down to<br />

X<br />

92<br />

c<br />

d<br />

the bottom of the V. The resulting sharp-edged cavity<br />

not only acted as a notch, but increased the risk of<br />

leaking.<br />

Testing of spin welded joints should only be carried<br />

out at the beginning of a production run, and thereafter<br />

on random samples, except when there is a risk that<br />

some parameter in the injection molding or the<br />

welding process may have changed. The percentage<br />

of rejects should remain negligible if the correct<br />

procedure is followed, and systematic testing of all<br />

welded components will not be necessary.<br />

Figure 11.32 Microtome of badly welded V-groove<br />

b<br />

a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!