General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
General Design Principles for DuPont Engineering Polymers - Module
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 11.30 <strong>Design</strong>s of pressure cartridges Figure 11.31 Tightness test using vacuum<br />
X X<br />
A (poor) B (good)<br />
However, it is not possible to draw any conclusions<br />
about water or gas tightness from the mechanical<br />
strength of the joint.<br />
Pressure vessels and floats must there<strong>for</strong>e also be<br />
tested in the appropriate medium. Containers which<br />
will be under internal pressure are stressed to about<br />
half the burst pressure, which should enable all weak<br />
points to be detected. Floats and other tight containers<br />
are inspected by dipping into hot water and looking<br />
<strong>for</strong> bubbles at the joint.<br />
It is, however, quicker and more reliable to test them<br />
under vacuum and a simple apparatus like that sometimes<br />
used <strong>for</strong> testing waterproof watches will often<br />
be all that is necessary.<br />
• Figure 11.31 illustrates the basic principle.<br />
A cylindrical glass vessel a, big enough to hold the<br />
part, is covered with a loose-fitting lid b and sealed<br />
with a rubber ring. The test piece is kept under water<br />
by the sieve c. Since the water level is almost up to<br />
the top of the vessel, only a small volume of air<br />
need be pumped out to produce an adequate<br />
vacuum; in fact, only a single stroke of a small hand<br />
pump will do. The rig should preferably be fitted<br />
with an adjusting valve to limit the degree of<br />
vacuum and prevent the <strong>for</strong>mation of bubbles by<br />
boiling.<br />
Checking Weld Joints by Inspection of<br />
Microtome Sections<br />
Correct design and proper welding should render<br />
microtome sections superfluous. The making of these<br />
sections requires not only expensive equipment but<br />
also a considerable amount of experience.<br />
However, such sections can occasionally result in<br />
the discovery of the causes of poor welds as, <strong>for</strong><br />
example, in Figure 11.32, which clearly shows how<br />
the V-groove was <strong>for</strong>ced open by the welding pressure<br />
and the matching profile was not welded right down to<br />
X<br />
92<br />
c<br />
d<br />
the bottom of the V. The resulting sharp-edged cavity<br />
not only acted as a notch, but increased the risk of<br />
leaking.<br />
Testing of spin welded joints should only be carried<br />
out at the beginning of a production run, and thereafter<br />
on random samples, except when there is a risk that<br />
some parameter in the injection molding or the<br />
welding process may have changed. The percentage<br />
of rejects should remain negligible if the correct<br />
procedure is followed, and systematic testing of all<br />
welded components will not be necessary.<br />
Figure 11.32 Microtome of badly welded V-groove<br />
b<br />
a