30.08.2018 Views

CEPAL Review no. 124

April 2018

April 2018

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

216 <strong>CEPAL</strong> <strong>Review</strong> N° <strong>124</strong> • April 2018<br />

debt. If the actual balance is positive, it serves as a source of funds; otherwise, it is added to the uses<br />

of the resources obtained through debt. 20<br />

Having specified the movements that occur “above the line” and “below the line”, the equation<br />

to determine the stock and flow of the debt takes the following form: 21<br />

with (8)<br />

Where ΔFRPt is the variation in FRP in period t. It can then be seen that FRP is separate from<br />

the net debt component in dollars. Thus, the variation of the debt stock for a year as a percentage of<br />

GDP is given by the equation:<br />

(9)<br />

By performing a decomposition similar to equation (5), and given that the actual balance is equal<br />

to the CAB plus the cyclical adjustment of income, the debt movement as a percentage of GDP can<br />

be related to the CAB target as follows:<br />

(10)<br />

where is the CAB target as a percentage of GDP in year t, and ac t<br />

is the cyclical adjustment as<br />

a percentage of GDP in year t.<br />

(b) Projections of net debt to 2025<br />

To exemplify the functioning of the dynamic model developed in the foregoing sections, the<br />

Chilean central government’s net debt path is simulated to 2025. The initial values ​of the main variables<br />

used in this exercise are consistent with the 2018 budget and the public-sector financial projection<br />

for 2019-2021, as reported by the Ministry of Finance in the Public Finance Report (DIPRES, 2017b).<br />

(i)<br />

The following describes the two alternative macroeco<strong>no</strong>mic scenarios used in the analysis: 22<br />

Trend scenario: the projected position in the 2018 budget and the public-sector financial projection<br />

for 2019-2021 and convergence to its trend values ​are considered as the initial position. Among<br />

other things, it is assumed that:<br />

20<br />

On the terms “Sources” and “Uses”, see information provided in the foot<strong>no</strong>te of Table I.17 of the report Evaluación de la Gestión<br />

Financiera 2017 (DIPRES, 2017c).<br />

21<br />

Treasury liabilities recorded “below the line” include recognition bonds (Arenas and others, 2009). Following Vergara (2002) it<br />

was decided to only count recognition bonds already issued within the debt. Thus, the sustainability exercise remains valid,<br />

since <strong>no</strong>n-payment of a recognition bond is the same as default on a<strong>no</strong>ther type of bond, in terms of government solvency.<br />

22<br />

The macroeco<strong>no</strong>mic variables used in the simulation of each scenario are presented in annex A3. For further analysis of the<br />

model used, see Bravo and others (2014).<br />

Fiscal sustainability and the cyclically adjusted balance policy: methodology and analysis for Chile

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!