30.08.2018 Views

CEPAL Review no. 124

April 2018

April 2018

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 <strong>CEPAL</strong> <strong>Review</strong> N° <strong>124</strong> • April 2018<br />

in income is increasing in all subregions, except for Mexico. 15 This means that income grew by more<br />

in absolute terms in the richest percentiles than among the poorest in all subregions, even though the<br />

absolute increase in income for the latter is proportionately larger. Absolute inequality has thus increased<br />

in the Latin American subregions.<br />

Figure 13<br />

Latin America (16 countries) a and subregions: relative and absolute variation of per capita<br />

income by percentile, 2002-2014 b<br />

(Percentages and PPP c dollars at 2011 prices)<br />

10<br />

A. Relative<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97<br />

1 000<br />

B. Absolute<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

-200<br />

-400<br />

-600<br />

1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97<br />

Latin America Mexico Central America<br />

Andean Region Brazil Southern Cone<br />

Source: Prepared by the authors, on the basis of household surveys.<br />

a<br />

Argentina, Bolivia (Plurinational State of), Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador,<br />

Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of).<br />

b<br />

Growth incidence curves; per capita income in purchasing power parity (PPP) at 2011 prices; annual equivalent relative variation.<br />

c<br />

Purchasing power parity.<br />

15<br />

In Mexico the income level of high-income recipients has fallen in absolute terms, which is corroborated if the variations between 2012<br />

and 2013 are analysed, and the starting point is changed to 2000. Nonetheless, the drop in income is greater and more generalized<br />

in relation to 2014 (in that year, it can be discerned in the median, whereas, in 2012 and 2013, it can only be detected in the last<br />

ventile). No more recent surveys are available to determine whether this is due to a survey problem or a more general drop in income<br />

in 2014. Without ig<strong>no</strong>ring these elements, a more in-depth study is needed to understand the factors underlying this development.<br />

More unequal or less? A review of global, regional and national income inequality

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!