Deep Work_ Rules for focused success in a distracted world ( PDFDrive.com )
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
with few exceptions, I don’t send e-mails after five thirty. But given how <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
e-mail has be<strong>com</strong>e with work <strong>in</strong> general, there’s a more surpris<strong>in</strong>g reality h<strong>in</strong>ted by<br />
this behavior: I don’t work after five thirty p.m.<br />
I call this <strong>com</strong>mitment fixed-schedule productivity, as I fix the firm goal of not<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g past a certa<strong>in</strong> time, then work backward to f<strong>in</strong>d productivity strategies that<br />
allow me to satisfy this declaration. I’ve practiced fixed-schedule productivity<br />
happily <strong>for</strong> more than half a decade now, and it’s been crucial to my ef<strong>for</strong>ts to build a<br />
productive professional life centered on deep work. In the pages ahead, I will try to<br />
conv<strong>in</strong>ce you to adopt this strategy as well.<br />
Let me start my pitch <strong>for</strong> fixed-schedule productivity by first not<strong>in</strong>g that, accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
conventional wisdom, <strong>in</strong> the academic <strong>world</strong> I <strong>in</strong>habit this tactic should fail.<br />
Professors—especially junior professors—are notorious <strong>for</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g gruel<strong>in</strong>g<br />
schedules that extend <strong>in</strong>to the night and through weekends. Consider, <strong>for</strong> example, a<br />
blog post published by a young <strong>com</strong>puter science professor whom I’ll call “Tom.” In<br />
this post, which Tom wrote <strong>in</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>ter of 2014, he replicates his schedule <strong>for</strong> a<br />
recent day <strong>in</strong> which he spent twelve hours at his office. This schedule <strong>in</strong>cludes five<br />
different meet<strong>in</strong>gs and three hours of “adm<strong>in</strong>istrative” tasks, which he describes as<br />
“tend<strong>in</strong>g to bushels of e-mails, fill<strong>in</strong>g out bureaucratic <strong>for</strong>ms, organiz<strong>in</strong>g meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
notes, plann<strong>in</strong>g future meet<strong>in</strong>gs.” By his estimation, he spent only one and a half out of<br />
the twelve total hours sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> his office tackl<strong>in</strong>g “real” work, which he def<strong>in</strong>es as<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts that make progress toward a “research deliverable.” It’s no wonder that Tom<br />
feels coerced <strong>in</strong>to work<strong>in</strong>g well beyond the standard workday. “I’ve already accepted<br />
the reality that I’ll be work<strong>in</strong>g on weekends,” he concludes <strong>in</strong> another post. “Very few<br />
junior faculty can avoid such a fate.”<br />
And yet, I have. Even though I don’t work at night and rarely work on weekends,<br />
between arriv<strong>in</strong>g at Georgetown <strong>in</strong> the fall of 2011 and beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g work on this chapter<br />
<strong>in</strong> the fall of 2014, I’ve published somewhere around twenty peer-reviewed articles. I<br />
also won two <strong>com</strong>petitive grants, published one (nonacademic) book, and have almost<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ished writ<strong>in</strong>g another (which you’re read<strong>in</strong>g at the moment). All while avoid<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
gruel<strong>in</strong>g schedules deemed necessary by the Toms of the <strong>world</strong>.<br />
What expla<strong>in</strong>s this paradox? We can f<strong>in</strong>d a <strong>com</strong>pell<strong>in</strong>g answer <strong>in</strong> a widely<br />
dissem<strong>in</strong>ated article published <strong>in</strong> 2013 by an academic further along <strong>in</strong> her career, and<br />
far more ac<strong>com</strong>plished than I: Radhika Nagpal, the Fred Kavli Professor of Computer<br />
Science at Harvard University. Nagpal opens the article by claim<strong>in</strong>g that much of the<br />
stress suffered by tenure-track professors is self-imposed. “Scary myths and scary<br />
data abound about life as a tenure-track faculty at an ‘R1’ [research-<strong>focused</strong>]