Deep Work_ Rules for focused success in a distracted world ( PDFDrive.com )
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
y side, push<strong>in</strong>g each other toward better and more effective designs. These ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />
consisted primarily of deep work—but a type of deep work we haven’t yet<br />
encountered. Bratta<strong>in</strong> would concentrate <strong>in</strong>tensely to eng<strong>in</strong>eer an experimental design<br />
that could exploit Bardeen’s latest theoretical <strong>in</strong>sight; then Bardeen would concentrate<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensely to make sense of what Bratta<strong>in</strong>’s latest experiments revealed, try<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
expand his theoretical framework to match the observations. This back-and-<strong>for</strong>th<br />
represents a collaborative <strong>for</strong>m of deep work (<strong>com</strong>mon <strong>in</strong> academic circles) that<br />
leverages what I call the whiteboard effect. For some types of problems, work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with someone else at the proverbial shared whiteboard can push you deeper than if<br />
you were work<strong>in</strong>g alone. The presence of the other party wait<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> your next <strong>in</strong>sight<br />
—be it someone physically <strong>in</strong> the same room or collaborat<strong>in</strong>g with you virtually—can<br />
short-circuit the natural <strong>in</strong>st<strong>in</strong>ct to avoid depth.<br />
We can now step back and draw some practical conclusions about the role of<br />
collaboration <strong>in</strong> deep work. The <strong>success</strong> of Build<strong>in</strong>g 20 and Bell Labs <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />
isolation is not required <strong>for</strong> productive deep work. Indeed, their example <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that <strong>for</strong> many types of work—especially when pursu<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation—collaborative<br />
deep work can yield better results. This strategy, there<strong>for</strong>e, asks that you consider this<br />
option <strong>in</strong> contemplat<strong>in</strong>g how best to <strong>in</strong>tegrate depth <strong>in</strong>to your professional life. In<br />
do<strong>in</strong>g so, however, keep the follow<strong>in</strong>g two guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d.<br />
First, distraction rema<strong>in</strong>s a destroyer of depth. There<strong>for</strong>e, the hub-and-spoke<br />
model provides a crucial template. Separate your pursuit of serendipitous encounters<br />
from your ef<strong>for</strong>ts to th<strong>in</strong>k deeply and build on these <strong>in</strong>spirations. You should try to<br />
optimize each ef<strong>for</strong>t separately, as opposed to mix<strong>in</strong>g them together <strong>in</strong>to a sludge that<br />
impedes both goals.<br />
Second, even when you retreat to a spoke to th<strong>in</strong>k deeply, when it’s reasonable to<br />
leverage the whiteboard effect, do so. By work<strong>in</strong>g side by side with someone on a<br />
problem, you can push each other toward deeper levels of depth, and there<strong>for</strong>e toward<br />
the generation of more and more valuable output as <strong>com</strong>pared to work<strong>in</strong>g alone.<br />
When it <strong>com</strong>es to deep work, <strong>in</strong> other words, consider the use of collaboration<br />
when appropriate, as it can push your results to a new level. At the same time, don’t<br />
lionize this quest <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction and positive randomness to the po<strong>in</strong>t where it crowds<br />
out the unbroken concentration ultimately required to wr<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g useful out of the<br />
swirl of ideas all around us.<br />
Execute Like a Bus<strong>in</strong>ess