Deep Work_ Rules for focused success in a distracted world ( PDFDrive.com )
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
statistics on e-mails sent per day and the average number of words per e-mail. He then<br />
<strong>com</strong>b<strong>in</strong>ed these numbers with the employees’ average typ<strong>in</strong>g speed, read<strong>in</strong>g speed,<br />
and salary. The result: He discovered that Atlantic Media was spend<strong>in</strong>g well over a<br />
million dollars a year to pay people to process e-mails, with every message sent or<br />
received tapp<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>com</strong>pany <strong>for</strong> around n<strong>in</strong>ety-five cents of labor costs. “A ‘free and<br />
frictionless’ method of <strong>com</strong>munication,” Cochran summarized, “had soft costs<br />
equivalent to procur<strong>in</strong>g a small <strong>com</strong>pany Learjet.”<br />
Tom Cochran’s experiment yielded an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g result about the literal cost of a<br />
seem<strong>in</strong>gly harmless behavior. But the real importance of this story is the experiment<br />
itself, and <strong>in</strong> particular, its <strong>com</strong>plexity. It turns out to be really difficult to answer a<br />
simple question such as: What’s the impact of our current e-mail habits on the bottom<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e? Cochran had to conduct a <strong>com</strong>pany-wide survey and gather statistics from the IT<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure. He also had to pull together salary data and <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on typ<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
read<strong>in</strong>g speed, and run the whole th<strong>in</strong>g through a statistical model to spit out his f<strong>in</strong>al<br />
result. And even then, the out<strong>com</strong>e is fungible, as it’s not able to separate out, <strong>for</strong><br />
example, how much value was produced by this frequent, expensive e-mail use to<br />
offset some of its cost.<br />
This example generalizes to most behaviors that potentially impede or improve<br />
deep work. Even though we abstractly accept that distraction has costs and depth has<br />
value, these impacts, as Tom Cochran discovered, are difficult to measure. This isn’t a<br />
trait unique to habits related to distraction and depth: Generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, as<br />
knowledge work makes more <strong>com</strong>plex demands of the labor <strong>for</strong>ce, it be<strong>com</strong>es harder<br />
to measure the value of an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s ef<strong>for</strong>ts. The French economist Thomas Piketty<br />
made this po<strong>in</strong>t explicit <strong>in</strong> his study of the extreme growth of executive salaries. The<br />
enabl<strong>in</strong>g assumption driv<strong>in</strong>g his argument is that “it is objectively difficult to measure<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual contributions to a firm’s output.” In the absence of such measures, irrational<br />
out<strong>com</strong>es, such as executive salaries way out of proportion to the executive’s marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />
productivity, can occur. Even though some details of Piketty’s theory are<br />
controversial, the underly<strong>in</strong>g assumption that it’s <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult to measure<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals’ contributions is generally considered, to quote one of his critics,<br />
“undoubtedly true.”<br />
We should not, there<strong>for</strong>e, expect the bottom-l<strong>in</strong>e impact of depth-destroy<strong>in</strong>g<br />
behaviors to be easily detected. As Tom Cochran discovered, such metrics fall <strong>in</strong>to an<br />
opaque region resistant to easy measurement—a region I call the metric black hole.<br />
Of course, just because it’s hard to measure metrics related to deep work doesn’t<br />
automatically lead to the conclusion that bus<strong>in</strong>esses will dismiss it. We have many<br />
examples of behaviors <strong>for</strong> which it’s hard to measure their bottom-l<strong>in</strong>e impact but that