Deep Work_ Rules for focused success in a distracted world ( PDFDrive.com )
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
distractions.)<br />
Be<strong>for</strong>e proceed<strong>in</strong>g to these strategies, however, I want to first address a question<br />
that might be nagg<strong>in</strong>g you: Why do we need such <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>terventions? Put another<br />
way, once you accept that deep work is valuable, isn’t it enough to just start do<strong>in</strong>g<br />
more of it? Do we really need someth<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>com</strong>plicated as the Eudaimonia Mach<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(or its equivalent) <strong>for</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g as simple as remember<strong>in</strong>g to concentrate more often?<br />
Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, when it <strong>com</strong>es to replac<strong>in</strong>g distraction with focus, matters are not so<br />
simple. To understand why this is true let’s take a closer look at one of the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
obstacles to go<strong>in</strong>g deep: the urge to turn your attention toward someth<strong>in</strong>g more<br />
superficial. Most people recognize that this urge can <strong>com</strong>plicate ef<strong>for</strong>ts to concentrate<br />
on hard th<strong>in</strong>gs, but most underestimate its regularity and strength.<br />
Consider a 2012 study, led by psychologists Wilhelm Hofmann and Roy<br />
Baumeister, that outfitted 205 adults with beepers that activated at randomly selected<br />
times (this is the experience sampl<strong>in</strong>g method discussed <strong>in</strong> Part 1). When the beeper<br />
sounded, the subject was asked to pause <strong>for</strong> a moment to reflect on desires that he or<br />
she was currently feel<strong>in</strong>g or had felt <strong>in</strong> the last thirty m<strong>in</strong>utes, and then answer a set of<br />
questions about these desires. After a week, the researchers had gathered more than<br />
7,500 samples. Here’s the short version of what they found: People fight desires all<br />
day long. As Baumeister summarized <strong>in</strong> his subsequent book, Willpower (co-authored<br />
with the science writer John Tierney): “Desire turned out to be the norm, not the<br />
exception.”<br />
The five most <strong>com</strong>mon desires these subjects fought <strong>in</strong>clude, not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
eat<strong>in</strong>g, sleep<strong>in</strong>g, and sex. But the top five list also <strong>in</strong>cluded desires <strong>for</strong> “tak<strong>in</strong>g a break<br />
from [hard] work… check<strong>in</strong>g e-mail and social network<strong>in</strong>g sites, surf<strong>in</strong>g the web,<br />
listen<strong>in</strong>g to music, or watch<strong>in</strong>g television.” The lure of the Internet and television<br />
proved especially strong: The subjects succeeded <strong>in</strong> resist<strong>in</strong>g these particularly<br />
addictive distractions only around half the time.<br />
These results are bad news <strong>for</strong> this rule’s goal of help<strong>in</strong>g you cultivate a deep<br />
work habit. They tell us that you can expect to be bombarded with the desire to do<br />
anyth<strong>in</strong>g but work deeply throughout the day, and if you’re like the German subjects<br />
from the Hofmann and Baumeister study, these <strong>com</strong>pet<strong>in</strong>g desires will often w<strong>in</strong> out.<br />
You might respond at this po<strong>in</strong>t that you will succeed where these subjects failed<br />
because you understand the importance of depth and will there<strong>for</strong>e be more rigorous <strong>in</strong><br />
your will to rema<strong>in</strong> concentrated. This is a noble sentiment, but the decades of<br />
research that preceded this study underscore its futility. A now volum<strong>in</strong>ous l<strong>in</strong>e of<br />
<strong>in</strong>quiry, <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> a series of pioneer<strong>in</strong>g papers also written by Roy Baumeister, has