Deep Work_ Rules for focused success in a distracted world ( PDFDrive.com )
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
probably not respond, the experience is trans<strong>for</strong>med. The <strong>in</strong>box is now a collection of<br />
opportunities that you can glance at when you have the free time—seek<strong>in</strong>g out those<br />
that make sense <strong>for</strong> you to engage. But the pile of unread messages no longer generates<br />
a sense of obligation. You could, if you wanted to, ignore them all, and noth<strong>in</strong>g bad<br />
would happen. Psychologically, this can be free<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
I worried when I first began us<strong>in</strong>g a sender filter that it would seem pretentious—<br />
as if my time was more valuable than that of my readers—and that it would upset<br />
people. But this fear wasn’t realized. Most people easily accept the idea that you have<br />
a right to control your own <strong>in</strong><strong>com</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>com</strong>munication, as they would like to enjoy this<br />
same right. More important, people appreciate clarity. Most are okay to not receive a<br />
response if they don’t expect one (<strong>in</strong> general, those with a m<strong>in</strong>or public presence, such<br />
as authors, overestimate how much people really care about their replies to their<br />
messages).<br />
In some cases, this expectation reset might even earn you more credit when you do<br />
respond. For example, an editor of an onl<strong>in</strong>e publication once sent me a guest post<br />
opportunity with the assumption, set by my filter, that I would likely not respond.<br />
When I did, it proved a happy surprise. Here’s her summary of the <strong>in</strong>teraction:<br />
So, when I emailed Cal to ask if he wanted to contribute to [the publication],<br />
my expectations were set. He didn’t have anyth<strong>in</strong>g on his [sender filter]<br />
about want<strong>in</strong>g to guest blog, so there wouldn’t have been any hard feel<strong>in</strong>gs if<br />
I’d never heard a peep. Then, when he did respond, I was thrilled.<br />
My particular sender filter is just one example of this general strategy. Consider<br />
consultant Clay Herbert, who is an expert <strong>in</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g crowd-fund<strong>in</strong>g campaigns <strong>for</strong><br />
technology start-ups: a specialty that attracts a lot of correspondents hop<strong>in</strong>g to glean<br />
some helpful advice. As a Forbes.<strong>com</strong> article on sender filters reports, “At some<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t, the number of people reach<strong>in</strong>g out exceeded [Herbert’s] capacity, so he created<br />
filters that put the onus on the person ask<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> help.”<br />
Though he started from a similar motivation as me, Herbert’s filters ended up<br />
tak<strong>in</strong>g a different <strong>for</strong>m. To contact him, you must first consult an FAQ to make sure<br />
your question has not already been answered (which was the case <strong>for</strong> a lot of the<br />
messages Herbert was process<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>for</strong>e his filters were <strong>in</strong> place). If you make it<br />
through this FAQ sieve, he then asks you to fill out a survey that allows him to further<br />
screen <strong>for</strong> connections that seem particularly relevant to his expertise. For those who<br />
make it past this step, Herbert en<strong>for</strong>ces a small fee you must pay be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
<strong>com</strong>municat<strong>in</strong>g with him. This fee is not about mak<strong>in</strong>g extra money, but is <strong>in</strong>stead<br />
about select<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who are serious about receiv<strong>in</strong>g and act<strong>in</strong>g on advice.